Planning complementary conservation of crop wild relative diversity in southern Africa

被引:13
|
作者
Brehm, Joana Magos [1 ]
Gaisberger, Hannes [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Kell, Shelagh [1 ]
Parra-Quijano, Mauricio [5 ]
Thormann, Imke [2 ,3 ]
Dulloo, Mohammad Ehsan [6 ,7 ]
Maxted, Nigel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Biosci, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] Alliance Biovers Int, Rome, Italy
[3] Int Ctr Trop Agr CIAT, Rome, Italy
[4] Paris Lodron Univ Salzburg, Dept Geoinformat, Salzburg, Austria
[5] Univ Nacl Colombia, Fac Ciencias Agr, Ciudad Univ, Bogota, Colombia
[6] Alliance Biovers Int, Rose Hill, Mauritius
[7] Int Ctr Trop Agr CIAT, Rose Hill, Mauritius
关键词
CAPFITOGEN; climate change analysis; conservation planning; crop wild relatives; diversity analysis; ex situ; gap analysis; genetic conservation; in situ; species distribution modelling; IN-SITU CONSERVATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; BIODIVERSITY; INVENTORY; AREAS;
D O I
10.1111/ddi.13512
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Aim To identify priority areas for in situ conservation and collection of germplasm for ex situ backup of crop wild relative (CWR) diversity in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) region as part of an action plan for the conservation and use of the region's important CWR diversity. Location SADC region. Methods Diversity, gap and climate change analyses at species and ecogeographic diversity levels were undertaken for 113 regional priority CWR taxa. Results CWR hotspots were identified in Eswatini (former Swaziland), Malawi, Mozambique, South Africa, Tanzania and Zimbabwe. Twenty-one per cent of regionally priority CWR occur exclusively outside existing protected areas (PAs), 50% are not conserved ex situ, and 64% are predicted to be negatively impacted by climate change. A total of 120 existing PAs in 13 countries were identified as containing populations likely to persist in the future for 80% of CWR taxa and about 50% of the ecogeographic diversity of these taxa; remaining diversity can be conserved in an additional 151 complementary sites in 11 countries. Democratic Republic of the Congo, Madagascar, South Africa and Tanzania contain important areas for conserving CWR diversity in situ in which no negative climate change impact is predicted. Priority CWR diversity in the provinces of Bas-Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo) and Cabinda (Angola) is threatened by climate change and should be collected urgently for ex situ conservation. Other areas rich in ecogeographic diversity that is not conserved ex situ are located in Angola, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Eswatini, Madagascar, Malawi, Mauritius, Mozambique, South Africa, Tanzania and Zimbabwe. Main conclusions We identified 120 PAs and 151 complementary sites outside of PAs in 13 SADC countries that could form the basis of the SADC Network for In Situ Conservation of CWR. We also selected priority areas for filling gaps in ex situ collections and for field survey.
引用
收藏
页码:1358 / 1372
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Modeling of crop wild relative species identifies areas globally for in situ conservation
    Holly Vincent
    Ahmed Amri
    Nora P. Castañeda-Álvarez
    Hannes Dempewolf
    Ehsan Dulloo
    Luigi Guarino
    David Hole
    Chikelu Mba
    Alvaro Toledo
    Nigel Maxted
    Communications Biology, 2
  • [42] Modeling of crop wild relative species identifies areas globally for in situ conservation
    Vincent, Holly
    Amri, Ahmed
    Castaneda-Alvarez, Nora P.
    Dempewolf, Hannes
    Dulloo, Ehsan
    Guarino, Luigi
    Hole, David
    Mba, Chikelu
    Toledo, Alvaro
    Maxted, Nigel
    COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY, 2019, 2 (1)
  • [43] Distribution, diversity and conservation of Anostraca (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) in southern Africa
    M.L. Hamer
    L. Brendonck
    Hydrobiologia, 1997, 359 : 1 - 12
  • [44] Distribution, diversity and conservation of anostraca (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) in southern Africa
    Hamer, ML
    Brendonck, L
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 1997, 359 (1-3) : 1 - 12
  • [45] Distribution, diversity and conservation of Anostraca (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) in southern Africa
    Hamer, M.L.
    Brendonck, L.
    1997, (359)
  • [46] Crop wild relatives conservation
    Haener, Raphael
    Schierscher, Beate
    Kleijer, Geert
    Rometsch, Sibylla
    Holderegger, Rolf
    AGRARFORSCHUNG, 2009, 16 (06): : 204 - 209
  • [47] Diamonds in the not-so-rough: Wild relative diversity hidden in crop genomes
    Flint-Garcia, Sherry
    Feldmann, Mitchell J.
    Dempewolf, Hannes
    Morrell, Peter L.
    Ross-Ibarra, Jeffrey
    PLOS BIOLOGY, 2023, 21 (07)
  • [48] Berries as a case study for crop wild relative conservation, use, and public engagement in Canada
    Migicovsky, Zoe
    Amyotte, Beatrice
    Ulrich, Jens
    Smith, Tyler W.
    Turner, Nancy J.
    Pico, Joana
    Ciotir, Claudia
    Sharifi, Mehdi
    Meldrum, Gennifer
    Stormes, Ben
    Moreau, Tara
    PLANTS PEOPLE PLANET, 2022, 4 (06) : 558 - 578
  • [49] A global approach to crop wild relative conservation: Securing the gene pool for food and agriculture
    Maxted N.
    Kell S.
    Toledo A.
    Dulloo E.
    Heywood V.
    Hodgkin T.
    Hunter D.
    Guarino L.
    Jarvis A.
    Ford-Lloyd B.
    Kew Bulletin, 2010, 65 (4) : 561 - 576
  • [50] Broadening the Base, Narrowing the Task: Prioritizing Crop Wild Relative Taxa for Conservation Action
    Kell, Shelagh P.
    Ford-Lloyd, Brian V.
    Magos Brehm, Joana
    Iriondo, Jose M.
    Maxted, Nigel
    CROP SCIENCE, 2017, 57 (03) : 1042 - 1058