Planning complementary conservation of crop wild relative diversity in southern Africa

被引:13
|
作者
Brehm, Joana Magos [1 ]
Gaisberger, Hannes [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Kell, Shelagh [1 ]
Parra-Quijano, Mauricio [5 ]
Thormann, Imke [2 ,3 ]
Dulloo, Mohammad Ehsan [6 ,7 ]
Maxted, Nigel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Biosci, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] Alliance Biovers Int, Rome, Italy
[3] Int Ctr Trop Agr CIAT, Rome, Italy
[4] Paris Lodron Univ Salzburg, Dept Geoinformat, Salzburg, Austria
[5] Univ Nacl Colombia, Fac Ciencias Agr, Ciudad Univ, Bogota, Colombia
[6] Alliance Biovers Int, Rose Hill, Mauritius
[7] Int Ctr Trop Agr CIAT, Rose Hill, Mauritius
关键词
CAPFITOGEN; climate change analysis; conservation planning; crop wild relatives; diversity analysis; ex situ; gap analysis; genetic conservation; in situ; species distribution modelling; IN-SITU CONSERVATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; BIODIVERSITY; INVENTORY; AREAS;
D O I
10.1111/ddi.13512
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Aim To identify priority areas for in situ conservation and collection of germplasm for ex situ backup of crop wild relative (CWR) diversity in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) region as part of an action plan for the conservation and use of the region's important CWR diversity. Location SADC region. Methods Diversity, gap and climate change analyses at species and ecogeographic diversity levels were undertaken for 113 regional priority CWR taxa. Results CWR hotspots were identified in Eswatini (former Swaziland), Malawi, Mozambique, South Africa, Tanzania and Zimbabwe. Twenty-one per cent of regionally priority CWR occur exclusively outside existing protected areas (PAs), 50% are not conserved ex situ, and 64% are predicted to be negatively impacted by climate change. A total of 120 existing PAs in 13 countries were identified as containing populations likely to persist in the future for 80% of CWR taxa and about 50% of the ecogeographic diversity of these taxa; remaining diversity can be conserved in an additional 151 complementary sites in 11 countries. Democratic Republic of the Congo, Madagascar, South Africa and Tanzania contain important areas for conserving CWR diversity in situ in which no negative climate change impact is predicted. Priority CWR diversity in the provinces of Bas-Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo) and Cabinda (Angola) is threatened by climate change and should be collected urgently for ex situ conservation. Other areas rich in ecogeographic diversity that is not conserved ex situ are located in Angola, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Eswatini, Madagascar, Malawi, Mauritius, Mozambique, South Africa, Tanzania and Zimbabwe. Main conclusions We identified 120 PAs and 151 complementary sites outside of PAs in 13 SADC countries that could form the basis of the SADC Network for In Situ Conservation of CWR. We also selected priority areas for filling gaps in ex situ collections and for field survey.
引用
收藏
页码:1358 / 1372
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development of a national crop wild relative conservation strategy for Cyprus
    Jade Phillips
    Angelos Kyratzis
    Charalambos Christoudoulou
    Shelagh Kell
    Nigel Maxted
    Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2014, 61 : 817 - 827
  • [22] Laying the groundwork for crop wild relative conservation in the United States
    Warschefsky, Emily J.
    Rieseberg, Loren H.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2021, 118 (04)
  • [23] Complementary Analysis and Implementation Plan for Conservation of Crop Wild Relatives in Finland
    Fitzgerald, Heli
    Kiviharju, Elina
    Palme, Anna
    Hyvarinen, Marko
    PLANTS-BASEL, 2023, 12 (18):
  • [24] Complementary conservation of South African crop wild relatives for plant improvement
    Bester, C.
    Le Maitre, N. C.
    Visser, M.
    Botes, W. C.
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2024, 174 : 820 - 829
  • [25] Ex situ and in situ conservation gap analysis of crop wild relative diversity in the Fertile Crescent of the Middle East
    Wathek Zair
    Nigel Maxted
    Joana Magos Brehm
    Ahmed Amri
    Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2021, 68 : 693 - 709
  • [26] Ex situ and in situ conservation gap analysis of crop wild relative diversity in the Fertile Crescent of the Middle East
    Zair, Wathek
    Maxted, Nigel
    Brehm, Joana Magos
    Amri, Ahmed
    GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 2021, 68 (02) : 693 - 709
  • [27] In situ conservation of Helosciadium nodiflorum: a crop wild relative of celery in Germany
    Mewis, Inga
    Bernhardt, Nadine
    Boenisch, Maria
    Brassac, Jonathan
    Naumann, Annette
    Zander, Matthias
    Schirmak, Uta
    Nachtigall, Marion
    Ulrichs, Christian
    CONSERVATION GENETICS, 2024, 25 (01) : 227 - 243
  • [28] Development of national crop wild relative conservation strategies in European countries
    Juozas Labokas
    Nigel Maxted
    Shelagh Kell
    Joana Magos Brehm
    José Maria Iriondo
    Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2018, 65 : 1385 - 1403
  • [29] CWRML: representing crop wild relative conservation and use data in XML
    Moore, Jonathan D.
    Kell, Shelagh P.
    Iriondo, Jose M.
    Ford-Lloyd, Brian V.
    Maxted, Nigel
    BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2008, 9 (1)
  • [30] CWRML: representing crop wild relative conservation and use data in XML
    Jonathan D Moore
    Shelagh P Kell
    Jose M Iriondo
    Brian V Ford-Lloyd
    Nigel Maxted
    BMC Bioinformatics, 9