Priority areas for the in situ conservation of crop wild relatives in South Africa

被引:6
|
作者
Holness, Stephen [1 ]
Hamer, Michelle [2 ,3 ]
Brehm, Joana Magos [4 ]
Raimondo, Domitilla [2 ]
机构
[1] Nelson Mandela Univ, Ctr African Conservat Ecol, Zool Dept, POB 77000, ZA-6031 Port Elizabeth, South Africa
[2] SANBI, Private Bag X101, ZA-0184 Pretoria, South Africa
[3] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Sch Life & Environm Sci, Private Bag X101, ZA-3209 Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa
[4] Univ Birmingham, Sch Biosci, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
关键词
biodiversity; climate change; spatial planning; protected areas expansion strategy;
D O I
10.1017/S1479262118000503
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Crop wild relatives (CWR) are wild plant taxa that have broader genetic diversity than crops hence they are an excellent source of genes and traits to improve crops. The potential value of CWR for agriculture and the need to protect these plants in their natural habitats (in situ) have been recognized globally. South Africa has the richest temperate flora globally, and the checklist of food and fodder CWR for the country considers 258 taxa to be high priority for conservation. A systematic conservation planning approach was used for spatial prioritization for in situ conservation actions for CWR. Protected areas were categorized on the basis of their CWR richness. The Kruger National Park has the highest number of CWR (66 taxa), but most of these are widespread and common. Fifty-seven protected areas, most of which are in the Western and Eastern Cape fynbos, are irreplaceable for protecting a number of endemic and threatened CWR. For priority CWR not adequately represented in existing protected areas, a spatial plan was developed to identify the smallest area that aligns with existing targets for the National Protected Areas Expansion Strategy, that are not transformed in terms of habitat, and that are projected to be climate change resilient. Mechanisms for ensuring uptake of the recommendations for the in situ conservation of CWR have been documented in a National Strategy and Action Plan and these include making information and data available and promoting the inclusion of CWR in current management and monitoring activities.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 127
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] In situ and ex situ conservation gap analyses of West African priority crop wild relatives
    M. U. Nduche
    J. Magos Brehm
    M. Parra-Quijano
    N. Maxted
    [J]. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2023, 70 : 333 - 351
  • [2] In situ and ex situ conservation gap analyses of West African priority crop wild relatives
    Nduche, M. U.
    Magos Brehm, J.
    Parra-Quijano, M.
    Maxted, N.
    [J]. GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 2023, 70 (02) : 333 - 351
  • [3] Trans Situ Conservation of Crop Wild Relatives
    Riordan, Erin Coulter
    Nabhan, Gary Paul
    [J]. CROP SCIENCE, 2019, 59 (06) : 2387 - 2403
  • [4] In Situ Conservation of Crop Wild Relatives: A Strategy for Identifying Priority Genetic Reserve Sites
    Kell, S. P.
    Maxted, N.
    Frese, L.
    Iriondo, J. M.
    [J]. AGROBIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION: SECURING THE DIVERSITY OF CROP WILD RELATIVES AND LANDRACES, 2012, : 7 - 19
  • [5] Gap analyses of priority wild relatives of food crop in current ex situ and in situ conservation in Indonesia
    Rahman, Wiguna
    Brehm, Joana Magos
    Maxted, Nigel
    Phillips, Jade
    Contreras-Toledo, Aremi R.
    Faraji, Mariam
    Quijano, Mauricio Parra
    [J]. BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2021, 30 (10) : 2827 - 2855
  • [6] Gap analyses of priority wild relatives of food crop in current ex situ and in situ conservation in Indonesia
    Wiguna Rahman
    Joana Magos Brehm
    Nigel Maxted
    Jade Phillips
    Aremi R. Contreras-Toledo
    Mariam Faraji
    Mauricio Parra Quijano
    [J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2021, 30 : 2827 - 2855
  • [7] Distribution of crop wild relatives of conservation priority in the UK landscape
    Jarvis, Susan
    Fielder, Hannah
    Hopkins, John
    Maxted, Nigel
    Smart, Simon
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2015, 191 : 444 - 451
  • [8] In situ conservation of crop wild relatives:: status and trends
    Meilleur, BA
    Hodgkin, T
    [J]. BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2004, 13 (04) : 663 - 684
  • [9] Towards In Situ Conservation of Crop Wild Relatives in Lithuania
    Labokas, J.
    Karpaviciene, B.
    Sveistyte, L.
    Radusiene, J.
    Loziene, K.
    [J]. AGROBIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION: SECURING THE DIVERSITY OF CROP WILD RELATIVES AND LANDRACES, 2012, : 91 - 95
  • [10] In situ conservation of crop wild relatives: status and trends
    Brien A. Meilleur
    Toby Hodgkin
    [J]. Biodiversity & Conservation, 2004, 13 : 663 - 684