Prospective visual evaluation of apodized diffractive intraocular lenses

被引:153
|
作者
Alfonso, Jose F.
Fernandez-Vega, Luis
Baamonde, M. Begona
Mont-Mico, Robert
机构
[1] Inst Oftalmol Fernandez Vega, Oviedo 33012, Spain
[2] Univ Oviedo, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Oviedo, Spain
[3] Univ Valencia, Dept Opt, Fac Phys, Valencia, Spain
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.03.034
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To evaluate distance, intermediate, and near visual performance in patients who had multifocal apodized diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. SETTING: Fernandez-Vega Ophthalmological Institute, Oviedo, Spain. METHODS: The best corrected distance visual acuity, best distance-corrected near visual acuity, intermediate visual acuity, distance contrast sensitivity under photopic and mesopic conditions, and patient satisfaction were measured in 325 patients and 335 patients who had bilateral implantation of the model SA60D3 IOL (AcrySof ReSTOR, Alcon) and model SN60D3 IOL (AcrySof Natural ReSTOR), respectively. RESULTS: At the 6-month postoperative visit, binocular best corrected distance acuity with the ReSTOR IOL and the Natural ReSTOR IOL was 0.034 logMAR +/- 0.004 (SD) and 0.019 +/- 0.020 logMAR, respectively (similar to 20/20). Binocular best distance-corrected near acuity was 0.011 +/- 0.012 logMAR and 0.035 +/- 0.013 logMAR, respectively (similar to 20/20). Intermediate visual acuity with both IOL models worsened significantly as a function of the distance of the test (P <.01). Photopic contrast sensitivity was within the standard normal range with both IOLs. Under mesopic conditions, contrast sensitivity with both IOLs was comparable to that with monofocal IOLs and lower, particularly at higher spatial frequencies, than under photopic conditions. No statistically significant differences in visual acuity or photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity were found between the 2 IOL models (P >.1). A patient satisfaction questionnaire showed that both IOLs performed well and were comparable in satisfaction regarding distance, intermediate, and near activities under different lighting conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The AcrySof ReSTOR IOL and AcrySof Natural ReSTOR IOL provided good visual performance at distance and near under photopic and mesopic conditions. Intermediate vision with both models was reduced compared with distance and near vision.
引用
收藏
页码:1235 / 1243
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Age-related visual outcomes in eyes with diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses
    Ryo Terauchi
    Hiroshi Horiguchi
    Shumpei Ogawa
    Kei Sano
    Tomoichiro Ogawa
    Takuya Shiba
    Tadashi Nakano
    Eye, 2022, 36 : 2260 - 2264
  • [32] Visual performance of four types of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses and a review of articles
    Doroodgar, Farideh
    Niazi, Feizollah
    Sanginabadi, Azad
    Karimian, Farid
    Niazi, Sana
    Alinia, Cyrus
    Javadi, Mohammad Ali
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 14 (03) : 356 - 365
  • [33] Age-related visual outcomes in eyes with diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses
    Terauchi, Ryo
    Horiguchi, Hiroshi
    Ogawa, Shumpei
    Sano, Kei
    Ogawa, Tomoichiro
    Shiba, Takuya
    Nakano, Tadashi
    EYE, 2022, 36 (12) : 2260 - 2264
  • [34] Visual performance of four types of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses and a review of articles
    Farideh Doroodgar
    Feizollah Niazi
    Azad Sanginabadi
    Farid Karimian
    Sana Niazi
    Cyrus Alinia
    Mohammad Ali Javadi
    International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2021, 14 (03) : 356 - 365
  • [35] Comparative visual performance of diffractive bifocal and rotationally asymmetric refractive intraocular lenses
    Hirotaka Tanabe
    Tomohiro Shojo
    Tomofusa Yamauchi
    Kosuke Takase
    Masahiro Akada
    Hitoshi Tabuchi
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [36] Visual Performance With Bifocal and Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lenses: A Prospective Three-Armed Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial
    Kaymak, Hakan
    Breyer, Detlev
    Alio, Jorge L.
    Cochener, Beatrice
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 33 (10) : 655 - +
  • [37] Comparison of a hydrophilic and a hydrophobic apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lens
    van der Linden, Jan Willem
    van der Meulen, Ivanka J.
    Mourits, Maarten P.
    Lapid-Gortzak, Ruth
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 33 (05) : 493 - 500
  • [38] Morphological evaluation of posterior capsule opacification in diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses
    Auffarth, GU
    Neubert, R
    Wang, L
    Hunold, W
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2001, 98 (02): : 138 - 142
  • [39] Comparison of a hydrophilic and a hydrophobic apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lens
    Jan Willem van der Linden
    Ivanka J. van der Meulen
    Maarten P. Mourits
    Ruth Lapid-Gortzak
    International Ophthalmology, 2013, 33 : 493 - 500
  • [40] Correlation of pupil size with visual acuity and contrast sensitivity after implantation of an apodized diffractive intraocular lens
    Alfonso, Jose F.
    Fernandez-Vega, Luis
    Baamonde, M. Begona
    Montes-Mico, Robert
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2007, 33 (03): : 430 - 438