Prospective visual evaluation of apodized diffractive intraocular lenses

被引:153
|
作者
Alfonso, Jose F.
Fernandez-Vega, Luis
Baamonde, M. Begona
Mont-Mico, Robert
机构
[1] Inst Oftalmol Fernandez Vega, Oviedo 33012, Spain
[2] Univ Oviedo, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Oviedo, Spain
[3] Univ Valencia, Dept Opt, Fac Phys, Valencia, Spain
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.03.034
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To evaluate distance, intermediate, and near visual performance in patients who had multifocal apodized diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. SETTING: Fernandez-Vega Ophthalmological Institute, Oviedo, Spain. METHODS: The best corrected distance visual acuity, best distance-corrected near visual acuity, intermediate visual acuity, distance contrast sensitivity under photopic and mesopic conditions, and patient satisfaction were measured in 325 patients and 335 patients who had bilateral implantation of the model SA60D3 IOL (AcrySof ReSTOR, Alcon) and model SN60D3 IOL (AcrySof Natural ReSTOR), respectively. RESULTS: At the 6-month postoperative visit, binocular best corrected distance acuity with the ReSTOR IOL and the Natural ReSTOR IOL was 0.034 logMAR +/- 0.004 (SD) and 0.019 +/- 0.020 logMAR, respectively (similar to 20/20). Binocular best distance-corrected near acuity was 0.011 +/- 0.012 logMAR and 0.035 +/- 0.013 logMAR, respectively (similar to 20/20). Intermediate visual acuity with both IOL models worsened significantly as a function of the distance of the test (P <.01). Photopic contrast sensitivity was within the standard normal range with both IOLs. Under mesopic conditions, contrast sensitivity with both IOLs was comparable to that with monofocal IOLs and lower, particularly at higher spatial frequencies, than under photopic conditions. No statistically significant differences in visual acuity or photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity were found between the 2 IOL models (P >.1). A patient satisfaction questionnaire showed that both IOLs performed well and were comparable in satisfaction regarding distance, intermediate, and near activities under different lighting conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The AcrySof ReSTOR IOL and AcrySof Natural ReSTOR IOL provided good visual performance at distance and near under photopic and mesopic conditions. Intermediate vision with both models was reduced compared with distance and near vision.
引用
收藏
页码:1235 / 1243
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative Analysis of Visual Performance and Optical Quality with a Rotationally Asymmetric Multifocal Intraocular Lens and an Apodized Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens
    Wang, Xiao
    Tu, Haixia
    Wang, Yong
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 2020
  • [42] Clinical Outcomes after Exchange of Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses with Monofocal Intraocular Lenses
    Im, Sang Eun
    Lee, Jungmin
    Lee, Sung Jin
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2023, 64 (09): : 768 - 776
  • [43] Prospective Assessment of Binocular Visual Outcomes after Staged Implantation of Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses with Three Near Additional Powers
    Ota, Yuka
    Nakamura, Kunihiko
    Yaguchi, Saori
    Hirasawa, Manabu
    Minami, Keiichiro
    Bissen-Miyajima, Hiroko
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2018, 59 (09)
  • [44] Assessment of whether visual outcomes with diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses vary with patient age
    Yoshino, Mami
    Bissen-Miyajima, Hiroko
    Minami, Keiichiro
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 39 (10): : 1502 - 1506
  • [45] Preoperative Factors Affecting Visual Acuity Following the Implantation of Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses
    Takabatake, Ryu
    Takahashi, Makiko
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 37 (10) : 674 - +
  • [46] Comparison of Objective and Subjective Visual Outcomes Between Pentafocal and Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lenses
    Bellucci, Carlo
    Mora, Paolo
    Tedesco, Salvatore Antonio
    Gandolfi, Stefano
    Bellucci, Roberto
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 40 (09)
  • [47] Design and Optimization of Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses
    Dong Bo
    Yang Ying
    Xue Changxi
    ACTA OPTICA SINICA, 2023, 43 (19)
  • [48] BIOMETRIC ASPECTS OF DIFFRACTIVE MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENSES
    BELLUCCI, R
    ANNALS OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1992, 24 (10): : 374 - 377
  • [49] The New Generation of Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses
    Wang, I-Jong
    Hu, Fung-Rong
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 108 (02) : 83 - 86
  • [50] AUTOMATED REFRACTION AND BIFOCAL DIFFRACTIVE INTRAOCULAR LENSES
    BELPOLITI, M
    VAIRA, F
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1993, 34 (04) : 885 - 885