Prospective visual evaluation of apodized diffractive intraocular lenses

被引:153
|
作者
Alfonso, Jose F.
Fernandez-Vega, Luis
Baamonde, M. Begona
Mont-Mico, Robert
机构
[1] Inst Oftalmol Fernandez Vega, Oviedo 33012, Spain
[2] Univ Oviedo, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Oviedo, Spain
[3] Univ Valencia, Dept Opt, Fac Phys, Valencia, Spain
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.03.034
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To evaluate distance, intermediate, and near visual performance in patients who had multifocal apodized diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. SETTING: Fernandez-Vega Ophthalmological Institute, Oviedo, Spain. METHODS: The best corrected distance visual acuity, best distance-corrected near visual acuity, intermediate visual acuity, distance contrast sensitivity under photopic and mesopic conditions, and patient satisfaction were measured in 325 patients and 335 patients who had bilateral implantation of the model SA60D3 IOL (AcrySof ReSTOR, Alcon) and model SN60D3 IOL (AcrySof Natural ReSTOR), respectively. RESULTS: At the 6-month postoperative visit, binocular best corrected distance acuity with the ReSTOR IOL and the Natural ReSTOR IOL was 0.034 logMAR +/- 0.004 (SD) and 0.019 +/- 0.020 logMAR, respectively (similar to 20/20). Binocular best distance-corrected near acuity was 0.011 +/- 0.012 logMAR and 0.035 +/- 0.013 logMAR, respectively (similar to 20/20). Intermediate visual acuity with both IOL models worsened significantly as a function of the distance of the test (P <.01). Photopic contrast sensitivity was within the standard normal range with both IOLs. Under mesopic conditions, contrast sensitivity with both IOLs was comparable to that with monofocal IOLs and lower, particularly at higher spatial frequencies, than under photopic conditions. No statistically significant differences in visual acuity or photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity were found between the 2 IOL models (P >.1). A patient satisfaction questionnaire showed that both IOLs performed well and were comparable in satisfaction regarding distance, intermediate, and near activities under different lighting conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The AcrySof ReSTOR IOL and AcrySof Natural ReSTOR IOL provided good visual performance at distance and near under photopic and mesopic conditions. Intermediate vision with both models was reduced compared with distance and near vision.
引用
收藏
页码:1235 / 1243
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Visual performance of AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive IOL: A prospective comparative trial
    Souza, Carlos E.
    Muccioli, Cristina
    Soriano, Eduardo S.
    Chalita, Maria Regina
    Oliveira, Filipi
    Freitas, Lincoln L.
    Meire, Luci P.
    Tamaki, Celina
    Belfort, Rubens, Jr.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 141 (05) : 827 - 832
  • [22] Visual Performance of Two Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lenses: A Randomized Trial
    Hienert, Julius
    Stjepanek, Kristina
    Hirnschall, Nino
    Ruiss, Manuel
    Zwickl, Hannah
    Findl, Oliver
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 37 (07) : 460 - +
  • [23] DISTANCE VISUAL-ACUITY WITH DIFFRACTIVE MULTIFOCAL AND MONOFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENSES
    WILLE, H
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1993, 19 (02): : 251 - 253
  • [24] Comparison of Visual Performance of four types of Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses
    Doroodgar, Farideh
    Karimian, Farid
    Niazi, Sana
    Sanginabadi, Azad
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2019, 60 (09)
  • [25] Visual function after monocular implantation of apodized diffractive multifocal or single-piece monofocal intraocular lens Randomized prospective comparison
    Zhao, Guiqiu
    Zhang, Jing
    Zhou, Yang
    Hu, Liting
    Che, Chengye
    Jiang, Nan
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 36 (02): : 282 - 285
  • [26] Characterization of diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses
    Damian Mendroch
    Stefan Altmeyer
    Uwe Oberheide
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [27] Diffractive-Refractive Intraocular Lenses
    Lenkova, G. A.
    Korolkov, V. P.
    Koronkevich, V. P.
    Nasyrov, R. K.
    Gutman, A. S.
    Iskakov, I. A.
    Treushnikov, V. M.
    OPTOELECTRONICS INSTRUMENTATION AND DATA PROCESSING, 2008, 44 (04)
  • [28] Diffractive-refractive intraocular lenses
    G. A. Lenkova
    V. P. Korolkov
    V. P. Koronkevich
    R. K. Nasyrov
    A. S. Gutman
    I. A. Iskakov
    V. M. Treushnikov
    Optoelectronics, Instrumentation and Data Processing, 2008, 44 (4) : 342 - 352
  • [29] Characterization of diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses
    Mendroch, Damian
    Altmeyer, Stefan
    Oberheide, Uwe
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [30] Comparative visual performance of diffractive bifocal and rotationally asymmetric refractive intraocular lenses
    Tanabe, Hirotaka
    Shojo, Tomohiro
    Yamauchi, Tomofusa
    Takase, Kosuke
    Akada, Masahiro
    Tabuchi, Hitoshi
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)