Comparison of DVH data from multiple radiotherapy treatment planning systems

被引:61
|
作者
Ebert, M. A. [1 ,2 ]
Haworth, A. [3 ,4 ]
Kearvell, R. [1 ]
Hooton, B. [1 ]
Hug, B. [5 ]
Spry, N. A. [1 ,6 ]
Bydder, S. A. [1 ,7 ]
Joseph, D. J. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Sir Charles Gairdner Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, Sch Phys, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[3] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Dept Phys Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] RMIT Univ, Sch Appl Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Curtin Univ Technol, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
[6] Univ Western Australia, Sch Med & Pharmacol, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[7] Univ Western Australia, Sch Surg & Pathol, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2010年 / 55卷 / 11期
关键词
QUALITY-ASSURANCE; DOSIMETRY; IMPACT; SIZE;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/55/11/N04
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
This study examined the variation of dose-volume histogram (DVH) data sourced from multiple radiotherapy treatment planning systems (TPSs). Treatment plan exports were obtained from 33 Australian and New Zealand centres during a dosimetry study. Plan information, including DVH data, was exported from the TPS at each centre and reviewed in a digital review system (SWAN). The review system was then used to produce an independent calculation of DVH information for each delineated structure. The relationships between DVHs extracted from each TPS and independently calculated were examined, particularly in terms of the influence of CT scan slice and pixel widths, the resolution of dose calculation grids and the TPS manufacturer. Calculation of total volume and DVH data was consistent between SWAN and each TPS, with the small discrepancies found tending to increase with decreasing structure size. This was significantly influenced by the TPS model used to derive the data. For target structures covered with relatively uniform dose distributions, there was a significant difference between the minimum dose in each TPS-exported DVH and that calculated independently.
引用
收藏
页码:N337 / N346
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Determination of the effect of immobilization systems used in radiotherapy on dose distribution and comparison of these measurements with treatment planning algorithm calculations
    Kuru, Humeyra Zeynep
    Tavlayan, Emin
    Olacak, Nezahat
    Yalman, Deniz
    Aras, Bulent Arif
    TURK ONKOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 27 (03): : 119 - 132
  • [42] Comparison of Prostate IMRT Plans From Three Commercial Treatment Planning Systems
    Chi, Z.
    Wang, L.
    Chen, L.
    Fan, J.
    Jin, L.
    Ma, C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06)
  • [43] Treatment planning comparison of IMPT, VMAT and 4π radiotherapy for prostate cases
    Tran, Angelia
    Zhang, Jingjing
    Woods, Kaley
    Yu, Victoria
    Dan Nguyen
    Gustafson, Gary
    Rosen, Lane
    Sheng, Ke
    Radiation Oncology, 2017, 12
  • [44] Comparison of Treatment Planning Parameters of Different Radiotherapy Techniques for Craniospinal Irradiation
    Goswami B.
    Jain R.K.
    Yadav S.
    Kumar S.
    Oommen S.
    Manocha S.
    Jadhav G.K.
    Iranian Journal of Medical Physics, 2021, 18 (03) : 164 - 170
  • [45] Radiotherapy for the treatment of pituitary adenomas: A dosimetric comparison of three planning techniques
    Ramos-Prudencio, Rubi
    Ileana Perez-Alvarez, Sandra
    Haydee Flores-Balcazar, Christian
    Angelica de Leon-Alfaro, Mayra
    Alfredo Herrera-Gonzalez, Jose
    Elizalde-Cabrera, Jonathan
    Rubalcava-Ortega, Johnatan
    Espinoza-Alvarado, Lissett
    Ivan Balderrama-Ibarra, Ricardo
    REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY, 2020, 25 (04) : 586 - 593
  • [46] Treatment Planning Comparison of SFUD Proton and elk Radiotherapy for Prostate Cases
    Tran, A.
    Zhang, J.
    Woods, K.
    Yu, V.
    Nguyen, D.
    Sheng, K.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3513 - 3513
  • [47] Comparison of Treatment Planning Algorithms and Monte Carlo Simulations in Oesophageal Radiotherapy
    Johns, D.
    Spezi, E.
    Downes, P.
    Lewis, D.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 123 : S776 - S776
  • [48] Treatment planning comparison of IMPT, VMAT and 4π radiotherapy for prostate cases
    Angelia Tran
    Jingjing Zhang
    Kaley Woods
    Victoria Yu
    Dan Nguyen
    Gary Gustafson
    Lane Rosen
    Ke Sheng
    Radiation Oncology, 12
  • [49] Standardization of CSI Treatment Planning and its Evaluation Using a DVH Registry
    Sepulveda, E.
    Patrick, H.
    Freeman, C.
    Kildea, J.
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2020, 67 : S380 - S380
  • [50] Integration of MRI in radiotherapy treatment planning in the UMC utrecht: Data and approach
    Van Vulpen, M.
    Lagendijk, J. J. W.
    Raaijmakers, B. W.
    Van den Berg, C. A. T.
    Battermann, J. J.
    Van der Heide, U. A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 84 : S94 - S95