Comparison of DVH data from multiple radiotherapy treatment planning systems

被引:61
|
作者
Ebert, M. A. [1 ,2 ]
Haworth, A. [3 ,4 ]
Kearvell, R. [1 ]
Hooton, B. [1 ]
Hug, B. [5 ]
Spry, N. A. [1 ,6 ]
Bydder, S. A. [1 ,7 ]
Joseph, D. J. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Sir Charles Gairdner Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, Sch Phys, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[3] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Dept Phys Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] RMIT Univ, Sch Appl Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Curtin Univ Technol, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
[6] Univ Western Australia, Sch Med & Pharmacol, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[7] Univ Western Australia, Sch Surg & Pathol, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2010年 / 55卷 / 11期
关键词
QUALITY-ASSURANCE; DOSIMETRY; IMPACT; SIZE;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/55/11/N04
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
This study examined the variation of dose-volume histogram (DVH) data sourced from multiple radiotherapy treatment planning systems (TPSs). Treatment plan exports were obtained from 33 Australian and New Zealand centres during a dosimetry study. Plan information, including DVH data, was exported from the TPS at each centre and reviewed in a digital review system (SWAN). The review system was then used to produce an independent calculation of DVH information for each delineated structure. The relationships between DVHs extracted from each TPS and independently calculated were examined, particularly in terms of the influence of CT scan slice and pixel widths, the resolution of dose calculation grids and the TPS manufacturer. Calculation of total volume and DVH data was consistent between SWAN and each TPS, with the small discrepancies found tending to increase with decreasing structure size. This was significantly influenced by the TPS model used to derive the data. For target structures covered with relatively uniform dose distributions, there was a significant difference between the minimum dose in each TPS-exported DVH and that calculated independently.
引用
收藏
页码:N337 / N346
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dosimetric Comparison of Multiplan and Eclipse Planning Systems for the Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Treatment of Prostate Cancer
    Li, Fang
    Ozhasoglu, C.
    Clump, D.
    Heron, D.
    Lalonde, R.
    Huq, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 2961 - 2961
  • [22] Extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy of lung and liver cancer - a clinical comparison of two treatment planning systems
    Bogner, J
    Dvorak, P
    Kroupa, B
    Dieckmann, K
    Georg, D
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2003, 68 : S45 - S45
  • [23] DVH Analyzer: design and algorithm to reveal DVH bands for quantitative analysis of robust radiotherapy treatment plans
    Singh, Gaganpreet
    Tyagi, Atul
    Thaper, Deepak
    Kamal, Rose
    Oinam, Arun Singh
    Kumar, Vivek
    HEALTH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 11 (05) : 981 - 994
  • [24] A prediction of intrinsic uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning systems
    Kiers, K.
    Van Horssen, P.
    Trinks, J. T.
    Pronk, P. R.
    Mans, A.
    Schneider, C. J.
    Damen, E. M. F.
    Janssen, T. M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 133 : S53 - S54
  • [25] Results of a DGMP survey on radiotherapy treatment planning systems
    Buchgeister, Markus
    Gneveckow, Uwe
    Salk, Jürgen
    Sauer, Otto A.
    Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik, 2002, 12 (03): : 204 - 210
  • [26] DVH COMPARISON OF WHOLE BREAST RADIOTHERAPY (WBRT) IN PRONE AND SUPINE POSITION
    Fargier-Bochaton, O.
    Grozema, F.
    Delorme, H.
    Rossi, S.
    Nouet, P.
    Mary-Bruttin, M.
    Vinh-Hung, V.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2011, 187 (08) : 532 - 532
  • [27] Integration of radiotherapy planning systems and radiotherapy treatment equipment: 11 years experience
    Kalet, IJ
    Jacky, JP
    Risler, R
    Rohlin, S
    Wootton, P
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 38 (01): : 213 - 221
  • [28] Comparison of Structure Contouring Efficiency and Dose-Volume Histograms (DVH) of Pinnacle3 and Eclipse Treatment Planning Systems for Prostate IMRT
    Reddy, N.
    Ravi, A.
    Chang, H.
    Lange, C.
    Nori, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06) : 3225 - +
  • [29] Assessment of PlanIQ Feasibility DVH for head and neck treatment planning
    Fried, David V.
    Chera, Bhishamjit S.
    Das, Shiva K.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 18 (05): : 245 - 250
  • [30] Comparison of multiple Coulomb scattering models for four proton PBS treatment planning systems
    Alshaikhi, J.
    D'Souza, D.
    Ainsley, C. G.
    Rosenberg, I.
    Royle, G.
    Amos, R. A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S1023 - S1024