Radiotherapy for the treatment of pituitary adenomas: A dosimetric comparison of three planning techniques

被引:1
|
作者
Ramos-Prudencio, Rubi [1 ]
Ileana Perez-Alvarez, Sandra [1 ]
Haydee Flores-Balcazar, Christian [1 ]
Angelica de Leon-Alfaro, Mayra [1 ]
Alfredo Herrera-Gonzalez, Jose [2 ]
Elizalde-Cabrera, Jonathan [2 ]
Rubalcava-Ortega, Johnatan [3 ]
Espinoza-Alvarado, Lissett [3 ]
Ivan Balderrama-Ibarra, Ricardo [4 ]
机构
[1] Inst Nacl Ciencias Med & Nutr Salvador Zubiran, Dept Radiotherapy, Vasco de Quiroga 15,Secc 16, Mexico City 14080, DF, Mexico
[2] Inst Nacl Cancerol, Div Radiotherapy, 22 San Fernando Ave,Secc 16, Mexico City 14080, DF, Mexico
[3] Inst Nacl Ciencias Med & Nutr Salvador Zubiran, Dept Neuroimaging, Vasco de Quiroga 15,Secc 16, Mexico City 14080, DF, Mexico
[4] Univ Guadalajara, Ctr Med Nacl Occidente, Inst Mexicano Seguro Social IMSS, Dept Radiotherapy, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico
关键词
Pituitary adenomas; Conformal radiotherapy; IMRT; VMAT; MODULATED RADIATION-THERAPY; INDUCED OPTIC NEUROPATHY; FRACTIONATED RADIOTHERAPY; STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY; CONSERVATIVE SURGERY; NORMAL TISSUE; TUMORS; BRAIN; RISK; CONFORMITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.rpor.2020.04.020
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim: Our goal was to compare conformal 3D (C3D) radiotherapy (RT), modulated intensity RT (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning techniques in treating pituitary adenomas. Background: RT is important for managing pituitary adenomas. Treatment planning advances allow for higher radiation dosing with less risk of affecting organs at risk (OAR). Materials and methods: We conducted a 5-year retrospective review of patients with pituitary adenoma treated with external beam radiation therapy (C3D with flattening filter, flattening filter-free [FFF], IMRT, and VMAT). We compared dose-volume histogram data. For OARs, we recorded D2%, maximum, and mean doses. For planning target volume (PTV), we registered V95%, V107%, D95%, D98%, D50%, D2%, minimum dose, conformity index (CI), and homogeneity index (HI). Results: Fifty-eight patients with pituitary adenoma were included. Target-volume coverage was acceptable for all techniques. The HI values were 0.06, IMRT; 0.07, VMAT; 0.08, C3D; and 0.09, C3D FFF (p < 0.0001). VMAT and IMRT provided the best target volume conformity (CI, 0.64 and 0.74, respectively; p < 0.0001). VMAT yielded the lowest doses to the optic pathway, lens, and cochlea. The position of the neck in extreme flexion showed that it helps in planning mainly with VMAT by allowing only one arc to be used and achieving the desired conformity, decreasing the treatment time, while allowing greater protection to the organs of risk using C3D, C3DFFF. Conclusions: Our results confirmed that EBRT in pituitary adenomas using IMRT, VMAT, C3D, C3FFF provide adequate coverage to the target. VMAT with a single arc or incomplete arc had a better compliance with desired dosimetric goals, such as target coverage and normal structures dose constraints, as well as shorter treatment time. Neck extreme flexion may have benefits in treatment planning for better preservation of organs at risk. C3D with extreme neck flexion is an appropriate treatment option when other treatment techniques are not available. (C) 2020 Greater Poland Cancer Centre. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:586 / 593
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dosimetric Comparison of Three Arc Techniques in Prostate Treatment Planning
    Jiang, L.
    Rule, W.
    Solberg, T.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [2] Dosimetric Comparison of Prostate Radiotherapy Treatment Techniques
    Buckey, C.
    Stathakis, S.
    Swanson, G.
    Su, F.
    Papanikolaou, N.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06)
  • [3] Dosimetric comparison of different radiotherapy techniques for the treatment of Retinoblastoma
    Nath, Jyotiman
    Goswami, Pranjal
    Medhi, Partha Pratim
    Sarma, Gautam
    Kalita, Apurba Kumar
    Bhattacharyya, Mouchumee
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2022, 21 (02) : 159 - 164
  • [4] DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON OF THREE TECHNIQUES FOR SPINE STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY
    Aljabab, Saif
    Vellayappan, Balamurugan
    Vandervoort, Eric
    Bahm, Jamie
    Zohr, Robert
    Sinclair, John
    Szanto, Janos
    Malone, Shawn
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 120 : S93 - S93
  • [5] RADIOTHERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF PITUITARY-ADENOMAS
    CHUN, M
    MASKO, GB
    HETELEKIDIS, S
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1988, 15 (02): : 305 - 309
  • [6] Stereotactic radiotherapy for the treatment of pituitary adenomas
    Selch, M. T.
    Gorgulho, A.
    Lee, S. P.
    Mattozo, C.
    Solberg, T. D.
    Agazaryan, N.
    DeSalles, A. A. F.
    [J]. MINIMALLY INVASIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2006, 49 (03) : 150 - 155
  • [7] Dosimetric comparison of treatment planning methods for breast boost radiotherapy
    James, H.
    Downes, S.
    Ramsey, N.
    Knights, W.
    Laker, R.
    Mackenzie, C.
    Venkitaraman, R.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 115 : S791 - S792
  • [8] Dosimetric Comparison of Several Radiotherapy Techniques in the Treatment of Scalp Cancer
    Schulze, D.
    Zhang, H.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E429 - E429
  • [9] Volumetric-Modulated Arc Radiotherapy for Carcinomas of the Pituitary Adenomas: A Treatment Planning Comparison with Fixed Field IMRT
    Sun, T.
    Liu, T.
    Yin, Y.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3841 - 3842
  • [10] Contemporary radiotherapy and radiosurgery techniques for refractory pituitary adenomas
    Roman O. Kowalchuk
    Daniel M. Trifiletti
    Paul D. Brown
    Jason P. Sheehan
    [J]. Pituitary, 2023, 26 : 298 - 302