Comparison of Treatment Planning Parameters of Different Radiotherapy Techniques for Craniospinal Irradiation

被引:0
|
作者
Goswami B. [1 ,2 ]
Jain R.K. [2 ]
Yadav S. [3 ]
Kumar S. [1 ]
Oommen S. [1 ]
Manocha S. [1 ]
Jadhav G.K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Radiotherapy, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi
[2] Department of Physics, Shobhit Institute of Engineering & Technology, Meerut, 250110, Uttar Pradesh
[3] Department of Radiotherapy, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, 462001, MP
关键词
Conformal Radiotherapy; Craniospinal Irradiation; Helical; Intensity-Modulated; Linear Accelerator; Radiotherapy; Three-Dimensional;
D O I
10.22038/ijmp.2020.45574.1712
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: The current study aimed to compare linear accelerator-based three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (Linac-3DCRT) technique with different techniques of the Radixact-X9 for the treatment of craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Material and Methods: Following a retrospective design, 22 CSI patients (Medulloblastoma) treated with Linac-3DCRT using the Novalis-Tx unit were selected for analysis. For each patient plan, additional sets of plans were generated using Helical, Direct-3DCRT, and Direct-intensity-modulated radiotherapy (DirectIMRT) techniques of the Radixact-X9 unit. The dose prescription for brain planning target volume (brain PTV) and spine PTV were 36 Gy in 20 fractions and kept the same for all techniques. Planning time, patient setup time, homogeneity index (HI), and different dose-volume parameters for both PTV and organs at risk (OARs) were evaluated for comparison. Results: The Radixact-X9-Helical technique can generate a plan in a more comparable and better manner in respect of maximum and minimum doses for most of the organs. The Radixact-X9-Helical technique resulted in better PTV homogeneity in comparison with Linac-3DCRT, Radixact-X9-Direct-3DCRT, and RadixactX9-Direct-IMRT. The values of HI were 3.57±0.77, 17.37±1.44, 8.15±1.02, and 8.62±0.98, respectively. Conclusion: Not only administration of the Radixact-X9-Helical treatment technique is easier, but also can generate a better homogeneous plan than other treatment techniques like 3DCRT and IMRT regarding different parameters for comparisons like dose-volume received by OARs, patient setup time, move isocenter, and many more. So it can be an integral part of the radiotherapy department, according to their clinical needs like shorter treatment time with good sparing of critical OARs. © 2021. All Rights Reserved
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 170
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EFFECT OF DIFFERENT RADIOTHERAPY TECHNIQUES ON HEMATOLOGICAL TOXICITY OF CRANIOSPINAL IRRADIATION
    Zhang, Yangqiong
    Yang, Huajun
    Deng, Guanhua
    Luo, Rishun
    Zhang, Ping
    Cai, Linbo
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2020, 22 : 191 - 191
  • [2] Comparison of different treatment methods in craniospinal radiotherapy.
    Tiken, Elif Eda
    Coban, Yasin
    Akin, Mustafa
    Karacam, Songul
    Uzel, Omer Erol
    Turkan, Tahir Sedat
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (15)
  • [3] Dosimetric Comparison of Craniospinal Irradiation Using Different Tomotherapy Techniques
    Zhang, X.
    Penagaricano, J.
    Han, E. Y.
    Morrill, S.
    Hardee, M.
    Liang, X.
    Gupta, S. K.
    Corry, P. M.
    Ratanatharathom, V.
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2015, 14 (04) : 440 - 446
  • [4] Dosimetric Comparison of Craniospinal Irradiation Using Different Tomotherapy Techniques
    Zhang, X.
    Penagaricano, J.
    Han, E.
    Liang, X.
    Morrill, S.
    Hardee, M.
    Gupta, S.
    Vaneerat, R.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 310 - 310
  • [5] Dosimetric comparison of integral dose for different techniques of craniospinal irradiation
    Goswami, Brijesh
    Jain, Rakesh Kumar
    Yadav, Suresh
    Kumar, Sunil
    Oommen, Saji
    Manocha, Sapna
    Jadav, Genesh K.
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2021, 20 (03) : 345 - 350
  • [6] A COMPARISON BETWEEN DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES FOR PLANNING THE RADIOTHERAPY TREATMENT OF THE BLADDER
    AUKETT, RJ
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1986, 31 (03): : 311 - 311
  • [7] CRANIOSPINAL IRRADIATION TECHNIQUES: A DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON OF PROTON BEAMS WITH STANDARD AND ADVANCED PHOTON RADIOTHERAPY
    Yoon, Myonggeun
    Shin, Dong Ho
    Kim, Jinsung
    Kim, Jong Won
    Kim, Dae Woong
    Park, Sung Yong
    Lee, Se Byeong
    Kim, Joo Young
    Park, Hyeon-Jin
    Park, Byung-Kiu
    Shin, Sang Hoon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (03): : 637 - 646
  • [8] IMRT for Craniospinal Irradiation: A Comparison with Traditional Techniques
    Studenski, M.
    Biswas, T.
    Xiao, Y.
    Harrison, A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [9] Comparison of Different Techniques in Breast Cancer Radiotherapy Planning
    Kara, F. Gulsen
    Haydaroglu, Ayfer
    Eren, Hakan
    Kitapcioglu, Gul
    JOURNAL OF BREAST HEALTH, 2014, 10 (02): : 83 - 87
  • [10] Craniospinal Irradiation Techniques
    Scarlatescu, Ioana
    Virag, Vasile
    Avram, Calin N.
    TIM14 PHYSICS CONFERENCE: PHYSICS WITHOUT FRONTIERS, 2015, 1694