Single-Port Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Short-Term Outcomes and Learning Curve

被引:15
|
作者
Kim, Juliana E. [1 ,2 ]
Kaldany, Alain [1 ,2 ]
Lichtbroun, Benjamin [1 ,2 ]
Singer, Eric A. [1 ,2 ]
Jang, Thomas L. [1 ,2 ]
Ghodoussipour, Saum [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Moses M. [3 ]
Kim, Isaac Y. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers Canc Inst New Jersey, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Sect Urol Oncol, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[2] State Univ New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Dept Surg, Div Urol, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[3] Hoag Hosp, Orange Cty Urol Associates, Irvine, CA USA
[4] Yale Sch Med, Dept Urol, 789 Howard Ave,FMP316, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
prostate cancer; robotic surgery; single-port; case review;
D O I
10.1089/end.2021.0885
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction and Objective: In 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the da Vinci single-port (SP) system, in which four instruments are still utilized, but enter through a single-site access trocar. Herein, we report the largest case series for SP robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) to date. Our primary aim is to analyze the perioperative and short-term outcomes of this procedure. Our secondary aim is an assessment of the learning curve with this new platform. Methods: A total of 157 patients underwent SP RARP by two surgeons who have completed > 3000 multiport robotic surgeries collectively. Institutional Review Board-approved prospectively collected data were used. Basic demographic preoperative variables and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. Results: Median patient age and prostate-specific antigen was 63 years and 6.3 ng/mL before treatment (interquartile range [IQR] 4.7-8.2 ng/mL). Average prostate weight was 47 g. The median operating time was 195 minutes (IQR 165-221.25 minutes) with a median estimated blood loss of 100mL (IQR 100-200 mL). Surgeon 1's operating time stabilized around case #56, and Surgeon 2 around case #26. Surgeon 2 used the transperitoneal approach for the first 7 cases. There were no intraoperative complications. There were six total post-operative complications (3.8%) and four (2.5%) were Clavien-Dindo scale >= IIIa. One hundred ten patients went home same day, 45 stayed 1 night at the hospital, with only 2 patients requiring stay in the hospital for more than 1 night (70%, 29%, and 1% respectively). With the median follow-up period of 9 months, rates of biochemical recurrence, pad-free, and potency preservation were 8.3%, 82.5%, and 64.4%, respectively. Conclusions: This case series confirms the safety and efficacy of SP RARP with acceptable short-term outcomes. There is a significant learning curve for this new modality. Shorter hospital stay appears to be an early benefit of the SP platform.
引用
收藏
页码:1285 / 1289
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Comparison of senhance and da vinci robotic radical prostatectomy: short-term outcomes, learning curve, and cost analysis
    Lin, Yen-Chun
    Yuan, Lun-Hsiang
    Tseng, Chi-Shin
    Hsieh, Tsung-Yi
    Huang, Yu-Wen
    Huang, Chao-Yuan
    Huang, Shi-Wei
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2024, 27 (01) : 116 - 121
  • [12] Comparison between single-port robotic radical prostatectomy and multiport robotic radical prostatectomy: reply letter
    Wei, Yong
    Ji, Qianying
    Zuo, Wenren
    Wang, Shiyan
    Wang, Xinyi
    Zhu, Qingyi
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2022, 11 (05) : 729 - 730
  • [13] OUTPATIENT EXPERIENCE WITH EXTRAPERITONEAL SINGLE-PORT ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Wilson, Clark
    Garisto, Juan
    Aminsharifi, Alireza
    Sawczyn, Guilherme
    Kaouk, Jihad
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E1134 - E1134
  • [14] SINGLE-PORT TRANSVESICAL ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: DESCRIPTION OF TECHNIQUE
    Beksac, Alp T.
    Abou Zeinab, Mahmoud
    Kaviani, Aaron
    Ferguson, Ethan
    Kaouk, Jihad
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E658 - E658
  • [15] MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL LEARNING CURVE ANALYSIS OF THREE SINGLE-PORT ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY APPROACHES FROM THE SPARC
    Ramos, Roxana
    Soputro, Nicolas
    Moschovas, Marcio C.
    Ferguson, Ethan
    Pedraza, Adriana M.
    Raver, Michael
    Chavali, Jaya S.
    Calvo, Ruben S.
    Mikesell, Carter
    Manfredi, Celeste
    Snajdar, Elizabeth
    Wang, Yuzhi
    Okhawere, Kennedy
    Almajedi, Mustafa
    Lorentz, Adam
    Badani, Ketan K.
    Rogers, Craig
    Nelson, Ryan
    Stifelman, Michael
    Joseph, Jean
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Nix, Jeffrey
    Yuh, Bertram
    Crivellaro, Simone
    Kim, Moses
    Ahmed, Mutahar
    Patel, Vipul
    Kaouk, Jihad
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E1190 - E1190
  • [16] PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES BETWEEN SINGLE-PORT AND MULTI-PORT ROBOTIC ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A SINGLE INSTITUTIONAL EXPERIENCE
    Saidian, Ava
    Fang, Andrew
    Hakim, Ornin
    Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina
    Nix, Jeffrey
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E900 - E901
  • [17] Single port robotic radical prostatectomy versus multi-port robotic radical prostatectomy: A human factor analysis during the initial learning curve
    Talamini, Susan
    Halgrimson, Whitney R.
    Dobbs, Ryan W.
    Morana, Carmelo
    Crivellaro, Simone
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2021, 17 (02):
  • [18] Vesicourethral Anastomosis in Transvesical Single-Port Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Technical Description and Perioperative Outcomes
    Soputro, Nicolas A.
    Ferguson, Ethan L.
    Ramos-Carpinteyro, Roxana
    Chavali, Jaya S.
    Geskin, Albert
    Kaouk, Jihad
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2023, 37 (09) : 1001 - 1011
  • [19] First 100 cases of transvesical single-port robotic radical prostatectomy
    Ramos-Carpinteyro, Roxana
    Ferguson, Ethan L.
    Chavali, Jaya S.
    Geskin, Albert
    Kaouk, Jihad
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 10 (04) : 416 - 422
  • [20] Single-Port Transvesical Robotic Radical Prostatectomy in a Patient with Hostile Abdomen
    Hemal, Sij
    Sobhani, Sina
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2024, 50 (06): : 779 - 780