Single-Port Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Short-Term Outcomes and Learning Curve

被引:15
|
作者
Kim, Juliana E. [1 ,2 ]
Kaldany, Alain [1 ,2 ]
Lichtbroun, Benjamin [1 ,2 ]
Singer, Eric A. [1 ,2 ]
Jang, Thomas L. [1 ,2 ]
Ghodoussipour, Saum [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Moses M. [3 ]
Kim, Isaac Y. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers Canc Inst New Jersey, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Sect Urol Oncol, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[2] State Univ New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Dept Surg, Div Urol, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[3] Hoag Hosp, Orange Cty Urol Associates, Irvine, CA USA
[4] Yale Sch Med, Dept Urol, 789 Howard Ave,FMP316, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
prostate cancer; robotic surgery; single-port; case review;
D O I
10.1089/end.2021.0885
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction and Objective: In 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the da Vinci single-port (SP) system, in which four instruments are still utilized, but enter through a single-site access trocar. Herein, we report the largest case series for SP robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) to date. Our primary aim is to analyze the perioperative and short-term outcomes of this procedure. Our secondary aim is an assessment of the learning curve with this new platform. Methods: A total of 157 patients underwent SP RARP by two surgeons who have completed > 3000 multiport robotic surgeries collectively. Institutional Review Board-approved prospectively collected data were used. Basic demographic preoperative variables and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. Results: Median patient age and prostate-specific antigen was 63 years and 6.3 ng/mL before treatment (interquartile range [IQR] 4.7-8.2 ng/mL). Average prostate weight was 47 g. The median operating time was 195 minutes (IQR 165-221.25 minutes) with a median estimated blood loss of 100mL (IQR 100-200 mL). Surgeon 1's operating time stabilized around case #56, and Surgeon 2 around case #26. Surgeon 2 used the transperitoneal approach for the first 7 cases. There were no intraoperative complications. There were six total post-operative complications (3.8%) and four (2.5%) were Clavien-Dindo scale >= IIIa. One hundred ten patients went home same day, 45 stayed 1 night at the hospital, with only 2 patients requiring stay in the hospital for more than 1 night (70%, 29%, and 1% respectively). With the median follow-up period of 9 months, rates of biochemical recurrence, pad-free, and potency preservation were 8.3%, 82.5%, and 64.4%, respectively. Conclusions: This case series confirms the safety and efficacy of SP RARP with acceptable short-term outcomes. There is a significant learning curve for this new modality. Shorter hospital stay appears to be an early benefit of the SP platform.
引用
收藏
页码:1285 / 1289
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Short-term outcomes of single port robotic hysterectomy with concomitant sacrocolpopexy
    Ashmore, Sarah
    Kenton, Kimberly
    Collins, Sarah
    Geynisman-Tan, Julia
    Lewicky-Gaupp, Christina
    Mueller, Margaret G.
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [32] Safety and Short-term Outcomes of a Single-Port Laparoscopic Approach to Colorectal Surgery
    Danforth, Rachel M.
    Monn, M. Francesca
    Spera, Leigh J.
    Fajardo, Alyssa D.
    George, Virgilio V.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2015, 150 (12) : 1195 - 1197
  • [33] Initial experience on extraperitoneal single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Chang, Yi-Fan
    Gu, Di
    Mei, Ni
    Xu, Wei-Dong
    Lu, Xiao-Jun
    Xiao, Yu-Tian
    Xu, Chuan-Liang
    Sun, Ying-Hao
    Ren, Shan-Cheng
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 134 (02) : 231 - 233
  • [34] Complications and short-term outcomes associated with single-port laparoscopic splenectomy in dogs
    Mayhew, Philipp D.
    Sutton, Jessie S.
    Singh, Ameet
    Runge, Jeffrey J.
    Case, J. Brad
    Griffin, Maureen A.
    Giuffrida, Michelle A.
    VETERINARY SURGERY, 2018, 47 : O67 - O74
  • [35] The Short-term Outcomes of Conventional and Single-port Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
    Kim, Say-June
    Ryu, Gil-O
    Choi, Byung-Jo
    Kim, Jeong-Goo
    Lee, Kwan-Ju
    Lee, Sang Chul
    Oh, Seong-Taek
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2011, 254 (06) : 933 - 940
  • [36] Initial experience on extraperitoneal single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Chang Yi-Fan
    Gu Di
    Mei Ni
    Xu Wei-Dong
    Lu Xiao-Jun
    Xiao Yu-Tian
    Xu Chuan-Liang
    Sun Ying-Hao
    Ren Shan-Cheng
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2021, 134 (02) : 231 - 233
  • [37] Single-port cholecystectomy: small scar, short learning curve
    Daniel Solomon
    Robert L. Bell
    Andrew J. Duffy
    Kurt E. Roberts
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2010, 24 : 2954 - 2957
  • [38] Single-port cholecystectomy: small scar, short learning curve
    Solomon, Daniel
    Bell, Robert L.
    Duffy, Andrew J.
    Roberts, Kurt E.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (12): : 2954 - 2957
  • [39] SINGLE PORT ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Goel, R.
    White, W.
    Haber, G.
    Crouzet, S.
    Kaouk, J.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 : A299 - A299
  • [40] Perioperative Outcomes Between Single-Port and "Multi-Port" Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Where do we stand?
    Bertolo, Riccardo
    Garisto, Juan
    Bove, Pierluigi
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Rocco, Bernardo
    UROLOGY, 2021, 155 : 138 - 143