Single-Port Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Short-Term Outcomes and Learning Curve

被引:15
|
作者
Kim, Juliana E. [1 ,2 ]
Kaldany, Alain [1 ,2 ]
Lichtbroun, Benjamin [1 ,2 ]
Singer, Eric A. [1 ,2 ]
Jang, Thomas L. [1 ,2 ]
Ghodoussipour, Saum [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Moses M. [3 ]
Kim, Isaac Y. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers Canc Inst New Jersey, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Sect Urol Oncol, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[2] State Univ New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Dept Surg, Div Urol, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[3] Hoag Hosp, Orange Cty Urol Associates, Irvine, CA USA
[4] Yale Sch Med, Dept Urol, 789 Howard Ave,FMP316, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
prostate cancer; robotic surgery; single-port; case review;
D O I
10.1089/end.2021.0885
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction and Objective: In 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the da Vinci single-port (SP) system, in which four instruments are still utilized, but enter through a single-site access trocar. Herein, we report the largest case series for SP robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) to date. Our primary aim is to analyze the perioperative and short-term outcomes of this procedure. Our secondary aim is an assessment of the learning curve with this new platform. Methods: A total of 157 patients underwent SP RARP by two surgeons who have completed > 3000 multiport robotic surgeries collectively. Institutional Review Board-approved prospectively collected data were used. Basic demographic preoperative variables and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. Results: Median patient age and prostate-specific antigen was 63 years and 6.3 ng/mL before treatment (interquartile range [IQR] 4.7-8.2 ng/mL). Average prostate weight was 47 g. The median operating time was 195 minutes (IQR 165-221.25 minutes) with a median estimated blood loss of 100mL (IQR 100-200 mL). Surgeon 1's operating time stabilized around case #56, and Surgeon 2 around case #26. Surgeon 2 used the transperitoneal approach for the first 7 cases. There were no intraoperative complications. There were six total post-operative complications (3.8%) and four (2.5%) were Clavien-Dindo scale >= IIIa. One hundred ten patients went home same day, 45 stayed 1 night at the hospital, with only 2 patients requiring stay in the hospital for more than 1 night (70%, 29%, and 1% respectively). With the median follow-up period of 9 months, rates of biochemical recurrence, pad-free, and potency preservation were 8.3%, 82.5%, and 64.4%, respectively. Conclusions: This case series confirms the safety and efficacy of SP RARP with acceptable short-term outcomes. There is a significant learning curve for this new modality. Shorter hospital stay appears to be an early benefit of the SP platform.
引用
收藏
页码:1285 / 1289
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Learning curve in robotic radical prostatectomy
    不详
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2005, 19 : A132 - A132
  • [42] Comparison of outcomes between single-port and multi-port robotic radical nephrectomy
    Okhawere, Kennedy E.
    Razdan, Shirin
    Bamby, Jewel
    Saini, Indu
    Zuluaga, Laura
    Sauer, Ruben Calvo
    Soputro, Nicolas
    Eun, Daniel D.
    Bhandari, Akshay
    Hemal, Ashok K.
    Porter, James
    Abaza, Ronney
    Mansour, Ahmed
    Ahmed, Mutahar
    Crivellaro, Simone
    Pierorazio, Phillip M.
    Singla, Nirmish
    Kaouk, Jihad
    Stifelman, Michael D.
    Badani, Ketan K.
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [43] The Learning Curve With Single-Port Cholecystectomy
    Kravetz, Amanda J.
    Iddings, Douglas
    Basson, Marc D.
    Kia, Michael A.
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2009, 13 (03) : 332 - 336
  • [44] Single-port Transvesical Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: The Surgical Learning Curve of the First 100 Cases
    Ramos-Carpinteyro, Roxana
    Ferguson, Ethan L.
    Chavali, Jaya S.
    Geskin, Albert
    Soputro, Nicolas
    Kaouk, Jihad
    UROLOGY, 2023, 178 : 76 - 82
  • [45] Incidence of Incisional Hernias after Single-Port Versus Multi-Port Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
    Norton, J. Corbin
    Compher, Tyler
    Shumaker, Luke
    Burns, Zachary
    Nix, Jeffrey W.
    Parmar, Abhishek D.
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2025, 39 (01) : 2 - 9
  • [46] Perioperative and short-term oncological outcomes of single-port surgery for transverse colon cancer
    Mitsuyoshi Tei
    Yozo Suzuki
    Masaki Wakasugi
    Hiroki Akamatsu
    Surgery Today, 2017, 47 : 676 - 682
  • [47] In Favor of Extraperitoneal Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Back to the Future Through a Single-Port Approach
    Crivellaro, Simone
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2021, 35 (08) : 1121 - 1122
  • [48] Perioperative and short-term oncological outcomes of single-port surgery for transverse colon cancer
    Tei, Mitsuyoshi
    Suzuki, Yozo
    Wakasugi, Masaki
    Akamatsu, Hiroki
    SURGERY TODAY, 2017, 47 (06) : 676 - 682
  • [49] A reply letter for comparison of single-port and multi-port robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner?
    Wei, Yong
    Ji, Qianying
    Zuo, Wenren
    Wang, Shiyan
    Wang, Xinyi
    Zhu, Qingyi
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2022, 11 (06) : 908 - 909
  • [50] Single-port extra-peritoneal robotic radical prostatectomy in a patient with hostile abdomen
    Sobhani, Sina
    Hemal, Sij
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 40 (04) : 279 - 280