Vesicourethral Anastomosis in Transvesical Single-Port Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Technical Description and Perioperative Outcomes

被引:4
|
作者
Soputro, Nicolas A. [1 ]
Ferguson, Ethan L. [1 ]
Ramos-Carpinteyro, Roxana [1 ]
Chavali, Jaya S. [1 ]
Geskin, Albert [1 ]
Kaouk, Jihad [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Glickman Urol & Kidney Inst, Dept Urol, 9500 Euclid Ave,Q10-419, Cleveland, OH 44194 USA
关键词
minimally invasive surgery; radical prostatectomy; robotic surgery; single-port; vesicourethral anastomosis; POSTERIOR MUSCULOFASCIAL RECONSTRUCTION; UNIDIRECTIONAL BARBED SUTURE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; ACUTE URINARY RETENTION; URETHROVESICAL ANASTOMOSIS; ASSISTED PROSTATECTOMY; STANDARD MONOFILAMENT; POLYGLYCONATE; IMPACT; TIME;
D O I
10.1089/end.2023.0269
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To describe the technical evolution and perioperative outcomes of vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) in transvesical (TV) single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP).Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was performed on 189 patients who underwent TV SP-RARP by a single surgeon using the purpose-built SP robotic platform. VUA was completed from within the bladder using two unidirectional V-loc sutures in a continuous, semicircular manner with greater emphasis posteriorly. The most recent 20 cases of TV SP-RARP were selected to evaluate the anastomosis technique and to compare the perioperative outcomes with the first 20 cases of TV SP-RARP performed at our institution. Demographic and clinical data were collected from the prospectively maintained database and statistical analysis was performed.Results: VUA was effectively completed in all cases using the aforementioned technique without any suture breaks, need for conversion, or evidence of intraoperative complication, including urine leak. Marked improvement in the learning curve was observed, which translated to significant reduction in the number of VUA sutures (median: 13 vs 15, p < 0.05) and faster anastomosis time (median: 19.1 vs 33.5 minutes, p < 0.05). The number of anastomotic sutures did not correlate with the prostatectomy specimen weight or volume, especially with both being significantly greater in the latest cases (median weight: 45.1 vs 37.6 g, p < 0.05; median volume: 40.9 vs 36.2 mL, p < 0.05). Postoperative outcomes were favorable with immediate continence achieved in 51.3% of our total cohort and with no patients demonstrating evidence of bladder neck contracture.Conclusion: We provided a detailed technical description of VUA in TV SP-RARP. The improved maneuverability of the SP robotic platform allowed for unique movements to facilitate suture placements from within the confined space of the bladder. The learning curve of a single surgeon was shown in our study, which resulted in notable reduction in the number of sutures, faster anastomosis time, and improved perioperative outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1001 / 1011
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comment on: "Vesicourethral Anastomosis in Transvesical Single-Port Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Technical Description and Perioperative Outcomes" by Soputro et al.
    Sathe, Aditya
    Shumaker, Luke A.
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2023, 37 (09) : 1012 - 1013
  • [2] SINGLE-PORT TRANSVESICAL ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: DESCRIPTION OF TECHNIQUE
    Beksac, Alp T.
    Abou Zeinab, Mahmoud
    Kaviani, Aaron
    Ferguson, Ethan
    Kaouk, Jihad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E658 - E658
  • [3] Single-Port Transvesical Robotic Radical Prostatectomy in a Patient with Hostile Abdomen
    Hemal, Sij
    Sobhani, Sina
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2024, 50 (06): : 779 - 780
  • [4] First 100 cases of transvesical single-port robotic radical prostatectomy
    Ramos-Carpinteyro, Roxana
    Ferguson, Ethan L.
    Chavali, Jaya S.
    Geskin, Albert
    Kaouk, Jihad
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 10 (04) : 416 - 422
  • [5] SINGLE-PORT ROBOTIC TRANSVESICAL TOTAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Zuberek, Marcin
    Feldman-Schultz, Oren
    Crivellaro, Simone
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E452 - E452
  • [6] COMPARISON OF PERIOPERATIVE AND SHORT-TERM FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES BETWEEN SINGLE-PORT TRANSVESICAL AND MULTI-PORT TRANSPERITONEAL ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Beksac, Alp Tuna
    Abou Zeinab, Mahmoud
    Kaviani, Aaron
    Ferguson, Ethan
    Kaouk, Jihad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E984 - E984
  • [7] Technical advancements in robotic prostatectomy: single-port extraperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy and single-port transperineal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Aminsharifi, Alireza
    Sawczyn, Guilherme
    Wilson, Clark A.
    Garisto, Juan
    Kaouk, Jihad
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (02) : 848 - 855
  • [8] SPECIAL SCENARIOS IN TRANSVESICAL SINGLE-PORT RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Mikesell, Carter
    Chavali, Jaya
    Pedraza, Adriana
    Soputro, Nicolas
    Ramos-Carpinteyro, Roxanna
    Kaouk, Jihad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E997 - E997
  • [9] SINGLE-PORT ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    White, Michael A.
    Haber, Georges-Pascal
    Khanna, Rakesh
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Forest, Sylvain
    Stein, Robert J.
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (04): : E188 - E188
  • [10] SINGLE-PORT ROBOTIC TRANSVESICAL SIMPLE PROSTATECTOMY STEP BY STEP
    Jue, Joshua
    Meyer, Alexa
    Richstone, Lee
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E597 - E597