In-house quality check of external beam plans using 3D treatment planning systems - a DVH comparison

被引:1
|
作者
Kumar, Ayyalasomayajula Anil [1 ]
Akula, Roopa Rani [4 ]
Ayyangar, Komanduri [4 ]
Reddy, Krishna P. [2 ,3 ]
Vuppu, Srinivas [2 ,3 ]
Narayana, P. V. Lakshmi [1 ]
Rao, A. Durga Prasada [1 ]
机构
[1] Andhra Univ, Dept Nucl Phys, Swami Jnanananda Labs Nucl Res, Visakhapatnam 530003, Andhra Pradesh, India
[2] MNJ Inst Oncol, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
[3] Reg Canc Ctr, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
[4] MGMMT, Int Canc Ctr, Bhimavaram, India
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2016年 / 17卷 / 03期
关键词
TPS; DVH; cobalt-60; Eclipse; ROPS; RADIOTHERAPY; ASSURANCE; PHOTON;
D O I
10.1120/jacmp.v17i3.6020
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
This paper presents a new approach towards the quality assurance of external beam plans using in-house-developed DICOM import and export software in a clinical setup. The new approach is different from what is currently used in most clinics, viz., only MU and point dose are verified. The DICOM-RT software generates ASCII files to import/export structure sets, treatment beam data, and dose-volume histograms (DVH) from one treatment planning system (TPS) to the other. An efficient and reliable 3D planning system, ROPS, was used for verifying the accuracy of treatment plans and treatment plan parameters. With the use of this new approach, treatment plans planned using Varian Eclipse planning system were exported to ROPS planning system. Important treatment and dosimetrical data, such as the beam setup accuracy, target dose coverage, and dose to critical structures, were also quantitatively verified using DVH comparisons. Two external beam plans with diverse photon energies were selected to test the new approach. The satisfactory results show that the new approach is feasible, easy to use, and can be used as an adjunct test for patient treatment quality check.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 146
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparison of 3D conformal radiotherapy and IMRT treatment plans in prostate cancer
    Helal, A.
    Sundar, S.
    Przeslak, A.
    Perkins, A.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2005, 3 (02): : 244 - 244
  • [32] 3d dose reconstruction to insure correct external beam treatment of patients
    Renner, Wendel Dean
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2007, 32 (03) : 157 - 165
  • [33] Feasibility of Proton Beam Therapy for Ocular Melanoma Using a Novel 3D Treatment Planning Technique
    Hartsell, William F.
    Kapur, Rashmi
    Hartsell, Siobhan O'Connor
    Sweeney, Patrick
    Lopes, Caitlin
    Duggal, Amanda
    Cohen, Jack
    Chang, John
    Polasani, Rajeev S.
    Dunn, Megan
    Pankuch, Mark
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 95 (01): : 353 - 359
  • [34] MODELING USE OF BEAM SPOILERS WITH A 3D TREATMENT-PLANNING ALGORITHM
    MCKENNA, MG
    CHEN, XG
    BLOCH, P
    RADIOLOGY, 1992, 185 : 129 - 129
  • [35] Repositioning accuracy of two different mask systems - 3D revisited: Comparison using true 3D/3D matching with cone-beam CT
    Boda-Heggemann, Judit
    Walter, Cornelia
    Rahn, Angelika
    Wertz, Hansjoerg
    Loeb, Iris
    Lohr, Frank
    Wenz, Frederik
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (05): : 1568 - 1575
  • [36] 3D versus 2D steering in patient anatomies: A comparison using hyperthermia treatment planning
    De Greef, M.
    Kok, H. P.
    Bel, A.
    Crezee, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYPERTHERMIA, 2011, 27 (01) : 74 - 85
  • [37] UPRIGHT 3D TREATMENT PLANNING USING A VERTICAL CT
    Shah, Anand P.
    Strauss, Jonathan B.
    Kirk, Michael C.
    Chen, Sea S.
    Kroc, Thomas K.
    Zusag, Thomas W.
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2009, 34 (01) : 82 - 86
  • [38] Variation in external beam treatment plan quality: An inter-institutional study of planners and planning systems
    Nelms, Benjamin E.
    Robinson, Greg
    Markham, Jay
    Velasco, Kyle
    Boyd, Steve
    Narayan, Sharath
    Wheeler, James
    Sobczak, Mark L.
    PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2012, 2 (04) : 296 - 305
  • [39] Preclinical paired noninferiority study comparing in-house and commercially available 3D planning for corrective osteotomy of the distal radius
    Charlotte Stor Swinkels
    Katleen Libberecht
    Emilia Gryska
    Peter Axelsson
    Per Fredrikson
    Anders Björkman
    Scientific Reports, 15 (1)
  • [40] In-house fabrication of 1.3 to 7 mm MAS drive caps using desktop 3D printers
    Amerein, Cyriaque
    Banerjee, Utsab
    Pang, Zhenfeng
    Lu, Wenqing
    Pimenta, Vanessa
    Tan, Kong Ooi
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2023, 348