In-house quality check of external beam plans using 3D treatment planning systems - a DVH comparison

被引:1
|
作者
Kumar, Ayyalasomayajula Anil [1 ]
Akula, Roopa Rani [4 ]
Ayyangar, Komanduri [4 ]
Reddy, Krishna P. [2 ,3 ]
Vuppu, Srinivas [2 ,3 ]
Narayana, P. V. Lakshmi [1 ]
Rao, A. Durga Prasada [1 ]
机构
[1] Andhra Univ, Dept Nucl Phys, Swami Jnanananda Labs Nucl Res, Visakhapatnam 530003, Andhra Pradesh, India
[2] MNJ Inst Oncol, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
[3] Reg Canc Ctr, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
[4] MGMMT, Int Canc Ctr, Bhimavaram, India
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2016年 / 17卷 / 03期
关键词
TPS; DVH; cobalt-60; Eclipse; ROPS; RADIOTHERAPY; ASSURANCE; PHOTON;
D O I
10.1120/jacmp.v17i3.6020
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
This paper presents a new approach towards the quality assurance of external beam plans using in-house-developed DICOM import and export software in a clinical setup. The new approach is different from what is currently used in most clinics, viz., only MU and point dose are verified. The DICOM-RT software generates ASCII files to import/export structure sets, treatment beam data, and dose-volume histograms (DVH) from one treatment planning system (TPS) to the other. An efficient and reliable 3D planning system, ROPS, was used for verifying the accuracy of treatment plans and treatment plan parameters. With the use of this new approach, treatment plans planned using Varian Eclipse planning system were exported to ROPS planning system. Important treatment and dosimetrical data, such as the beam setup accuracy, target dose coverage, and dose to critical structures, were also quantitatively verified using DVH comparisons. Two external beam plans with diverse photon energies were selected to test the new approach. The satisfactory results show that the new approach is feasible, easy to use, and can be used as an adjunct test for patient treatment quality check.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 146
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validation of an IMRT beam model using a secondary treatment planning system as a 3D dosimeter
    Xing, A.
    Arumugam, S.
    Holloway, L.
    Goozee, G.
    7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON 3D RADIATION DOSIMETRY (IC3DDOSE), 2013, 444
  • [22] Quality control of dose volume histogram computation characteristics of 3D treatment planning systems
    Panitsa, E
    Rosenwald, JC
    Kappas, C
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1998, 43 (10): : 2807 - 2816
  • [23] WILMS TUMOR SURGERY WITH LOW COST IN-HOUSE 3D PRINTING MODELS: A PROMISING TOOL FOR SURGICAL PLANNING
    Adell-Gomez, Nuria
    Valls-Esteve, Arnau
    Pasten, Albert
    Munuera, Josep
    Krauel, Lucas
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2023, 70 : S171 - S172
  • [24] Comparison of IMRT plans with tissue heterogeneity corrections using the Pinnacle3 and CORVUS treatment planning systems
    Pillai, S
    Ayyangar, K
    Li, S
    Nehru, R
    Zhen, W
    Enke, C
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (06) : 1964 - 1964
  • [25] In-House Virtual Surgery Planning and 3D Printing for Head and Neck Surgery With Free Software: Our Workflow
    Gomez, Vicenc J.
    Martin-Gonzalez, Antonio
    Zafra-Vallejo, Victor
    Zubillaga-Rodriguez, Ignacio
    Fernandez-Garcia, Antonio
    Sanchez-Aniceto, Gregorio
    CRANIOMAXILLOFACIAL TRAUMA & RECONSTRUCTION, 2024, 17 (04) : 331 - 339
  • [26] A comparison of a moderately hypofractionated IMRT planning technique used in a randomised UK external beam radiotherapy trial with an in-house technique for localised prostate cancer
    Ian, Gleeson
    REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY, 2020, 25 (03) : 360 - 366
  • [27] Adjoint Monte Carlo method for prostate external photon beam treatment planning: an application to 3D patient anatomy
    Wang, B
    Goldstein, M
    Xu, XG
    Sahoo, N
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (05): : 923 - 935
  • [28] A Comparison of Radiotherapy Treatment Plans for Hodgkin Lymphoma using 3D Conformal and Helical Tomotherapy Methods
    Rahman, F.
    Fairfoul, J.
    Williams, M. V.
    Burnet, N. G.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 23 (03) : S49 - S49
  • [29] First tests to implement an in-house 3d-printed photon bolus procedure using clinical treatment planning system data
    Dipasquale, G.
    Miralbell, R.
    Starkov, P.
    Ratib, O.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 118 : S32 - S32
  • [30] DOSIMETRIC COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL AND 3D CONFORMAL TREATMENT PLANS FOR PROSTATE CANCER
    Allahverdi, M.
    Vaezzadeh, S. A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2009, 92 : S250 - S250