The relationship between the last planner® system and collaborative planning practice in UK construction

被引:39
|
作者
Daniel, Emmanuel Itodo [1 ]
Pasquire, Christine [1 ,2 ]
Dickens, Graham
Ballard, Herman Glenn [3 ]
机构
[1] Nottingham Trent Univ, Sch Architecture Design & Built Environm, Ctr Lean Projects, Nottingham, England
[2] Nottingham Trent Univ, Sch Architecture Design & Built Environm, Nottingham, England
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Project Prod Syst Lab Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
UK; Construction planning; Collaborative planning; Construction sector; Last planner system; Production planning and management;
D O I
10.1108/ECAM-07-2015-0109
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to identify how the newly emerging UK practice of "collaborative planning" (CP) for construction project delivery aligns with the advocated principles of the global last planner system (LPS) of production planning and control. Design/methodology/approach - A mixed, qualitative, exploratory approach was adopted for the study. This entailed qualitative data through three techniques, namely: semi-structured interviews, documents analysis, and structured observation. In total, 30 in-depth interviews were conducted over a 12 month period with lean construction consultants, clients, main contractors, and subcontractors drawn from the building, highways and infrastructure and rail sector. In all, 15 projects were visited where practices were observed. Findings - The study reveals that the current practice of CP in the UK partially aligns with the LPS principles. Where practitioners have heard of the LPS they believe it to be the same practice as CP. Research limitations/implications - This study is limited to 30 interviews, observation of 15 projects and document analysis. The aim of the study is not to generalise the findings, however, since the study examined top construction companies and practitioners in the UK and the findings were consistent across the sample, some conclusions could be made. The study is also limited to examining the construction phase only, future studies should incorporate the design phase. Practical implications - A clear identification of the elements of current practice compared to the components of the LPS provides a contribution to the future practice of project production planning and management in the construction industry. Social implications - The study highlights a continuing resistance to collaboration within the industry. This resistance is subtly embedded within implemented practices even though they are based on collaborative working for their success. Originality/value - This is among the first studies in the UK that comprehensively examines and reports the application of LPS/CP practice in construction across the major construction sectors. Future studies could build on the findings from this work to develop an approach/methodology to improve the current practice.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 425
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Application of the Last Planner System in Schedule Management of Construction Projects
    Jin, Junyan
    CIVIL ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURE AND SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE II, PTS 1 AND 2, 2013, 438-439 : 1777 - 1781
  • [22] Moving toward lean construction through automation of planning and control in last planner system: A systematic literature review
    Agrawal, Ajay Kumar
    Zou, Yang
    Chen, Long
    Abdelmegid, Mohammed Adel
    González, Vicente A.
    Developments in the Built Environment, 2024, 18
  • [23] Moving toward lean construction through automation of planning and control in last planner system: A systematic literature review
    Agrawal, Ajay Kumar
    Zou, Yang
    Chen, Long
    Abdelmegid, Mohammed Adel
    Gonzalez, Vicente A.
    DEVELOPMENTS IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 18
  • [24] Last Planner System Framework to Assess Planning Reliability in Architectural Design
    Shehab, Lynn
    Al Hattab, Malak
    Khalife, Salam
    El Samad, Ghali
    Abbas, Yara
    Hamzeh, Farook
    BUILDINGS, 2023, 13 (11)
  • [25] Predicting construction schedule performance with last planner system and machine learning
    Lagos, Camilo I.
    Herrera, Rodrigo F.
    Cawley, Alejandro F. Mac
    Alarcon, Luis F.
    AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2024, 167
  • [26] Development of Approach to Support Construction Stakeholders in Implementation of the Last Planner System
    Daniel, Emmanuel Itodo
    Pasquire, Christine
    Dickens, Graham
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2019, 35 (05)
  • [27] Effective Implementation of Last Planner System in Construction Projects: A Case Study
    Gjerde, M. R. D.
    Ratnayake, R. M. C.
    Samarakoon, S. M. S. M. K.
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM), 2019, : 1139 - 1144
  • [28] 2020 CURRENT PROCESS BENCHMARK FOR THE LAST PLANNER® SYSTEM OF PROJECT PLANNING AND CONTROL
    Ballard, Glenn
    Tommelein, Iris
    Lean Construction Journal, 2021, 2021 : 53 - 121
  • [29] Techniques and benefits of implementing the last planner system in the Gaza Strip construction industry
    Tayeh, Bassam A.
    Al Hallaq, Khalid
    Zahoor, Hafiz
    Al Faqawi, Abdulla H.
    ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 26 (07) : 1424 - 1436
  • [30] Investigating the challenges related to combining BIM and Last Planner System on construction sites
    Conrad BOTON
    Yaya PITTI
    Daniel FORGUES
    IvankaIORDANOVA
    Frontiers of Engineering Management, 2021, (02) : 172 - 182