A novel patient-specific instrument design can deliver robotic level accuracy in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

被引:11
|
作者
Jones, Gareth G. [1 ]
Clarke, Susannah [1 ]
Harris, Simon [1 ]
Jaere, Martin [1 ]
Aldalmani, Thunayan [2 ]
de Klee, Patrick [1 ,3 ]
Cobb, Justin P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, MSk Lab, Charing Cross Hosp, 7th Floor,Lab Block, London W6 8RF, England
[2] Royal Coll Surgeons Ireland, 123 St Stephens Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
[3] Charing Cross Hosp, MSk Lab, Embody Orthopaed, 7th Floor,Lab Block, London W6 8RF, England
来源
KNEE | 2019年 / 26卷 / 06期
关键词
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; Partial knee replacement; Patient specific instrumentation; PSI; Robotic surgery; Robot-assisted surgery; TIBIAL COMPONENT; REPLACEMENT; ALIGNMENT; VARUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.knee.2019.08.001
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A previous randomised controlled trial (RCT) by our group found that robotic assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) surgery was significantly more accurate than conventional instrumentation. The aim of this study was to determine whether a low-cost novel PSI design could deliver the same level of accuracy as the robot in the same time efficient manner as conventional instruments. Methods: Thirty patients undergoing medial UKA took part. Tibial component position was planned using a low dose CT-scan, and compared to a day 1 postoperative CT-scan to determine the difference between the planned and achieved positions. Operations were performed by one expert surgeon using PSI (Embody, London, UK). Results: The mean absolute difference between planned and achieved tibial implant positions using PSI was 2.0 degrees (SD 1.0 degrees) in the coronal plane, 1.8 degrees (SD 1.5) in the sagittal plane, and 4.5 degrees (SD 33) in the axial plane. These results were not significantly different to the 13 historical robotic cases (mean difference 0.5 degrees, 0.5 degrees, and 1.7 degrees, p = 0.1907, 0.2867 and 0.1049 respectively). PSI mean operating time was on average 62 min shorter than the robotic group (p < 0.0001) and 40 min shorter than the conventional instrument group (p < 0.0001). No complications were reported. Conclusions: In conclusion, this clinical trial demonstrates that for tibial component positioning in UKA, a novel design PSI guide in the hands of an expert surgeon, can safely deliver comparable accuracy to a robotic system, whilst being significantly faster than conventional instruments. Crown Copyright (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1421 / 1428
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient-specific implants for lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
    Marco K. Demange
    Arvind Von Keudell
    Christian Probst
    Hiroshi Yoshioka
    Andreas H. Gomoll
    International Orthopaedics, 2015, 39 : 1519 - 1526
  • [2] Patient-specific implants for lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
    Demange, Marco K.
    Von Keudell, Arvind
    Probst, Christian
    Yoshioka, Hiroshi
    Gomoll, Andreas H.
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 39 (08) : 1519 - 1526
  • [3] Patient-Specific Instrument Can Improve Functional and Radiographic Results during Learning Curve for Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
    Sanz-Ruiz, Pablo
    Antonio Matas-Diez, Jose
    Carbo-Laso, Esther
    Perez-Mananes, Ruben
    Vaquero-Martin, Javier
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (02) : 180 - 185
  • [4] Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty with Use of Novel Patient-Specific Resurfacing Implants and Personalized Jigs
    Fitz, Wolfgang
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 91A : 69 - 76
  • [5] Evaluation of implant position and knee alignment after patient-specific unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
    Koeck, Franz Xaver
    Beckmann, Johannes
    Luring, Christian
    Rath, Bjoern
    Grifka, Joachim
    Basad, Erhan
    KNEE, 2011, 18 (05): : 294 - 299
  • [6] Does patient-specific instrument or robot improve imaging and functional outcomes in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A bayesian analysis
    Jiao, Xufeng
    Du, Mincong
    Li, Qi
    Huang, Cheng
    Ding, Ran
    Wang, Weiguo
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2024, 144 (11) : 4827 - 4838
  • [7] Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty with Patient-Specific Instrument
    Kim, Kwang-kyoun
    Howell, Stephen M.
    Won, Ye-yeon
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 61 (03) : 201 - 209
  • [8] Accuracy of Patient-Specific Instrument for Cylindrical Axis Implementation in Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Kim, Kwang-Kyoun
    Song, Jaehwang
    CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2023, 15 (05) : 760 - 769
  • [9] Patient-reported outcome after patient-specific unicondylar knee arthroplasty for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis
    Viola Freigang
    Markus Rupp
    Christian Pfeifer
    Michael Worlicek
    Stefan Radke
    Stephan Deckelmann
    Volker Alt
    Florian Baumann
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 21
  • [10] Patient-reported outcome after patient-specific unicondylar knee arthroplasty for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis
    Freigang, Viola
    Rupp, Markus
    Pfeifer, Christian
    Worlicek, Michael
    Radke, Stefan
    Deckelmann, Stephan
    Alt, Volker
    Baumann, Florian
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2020, 21 (01)