A novel patient-specific instrument design can deliver robotic level accuracy in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

被引:11
|
作者
Jones, Gareth G. [1 ]
Clarke, Susannah [1 ]
Harris, Simon [1 ]
Jaere, Martin [1 ]
Aldalmani, Thunayan [2 ]
de Klee, Patrick [1 ,3 ]
Cobb, Justin P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, MSk Lab, Charing Cross Hosp, 7th Floor,Lab Block, London W6 8RF, England
[2] Royal Coll Surgeons Ireland, 123 St Stephens Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
[3] Charing Cross Hosp, MSk Lab, Embody Orthopaed, 7th Floor,Lab Block, London W6 8RF, England
来源
KNEE | 2019年 / 26卷 / 06期
关键词
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; Partial knee replacement; Patient specific instrumentation; PSI; Robotic surgery; Robot-assisted surgery; TIBIAL COMPONENT; REPLACEMENT; ALIGNMENT; VARUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.knee.2019.08.001
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A previous randomised controlled trial (RCT) by our group found that robotic assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) surgery was significantly more accurate than conventional instrumentation. The aim of this study was to determine whether a low-cost novel PSI design could deliver the same level of accuracy as the robot in the same time efficient manner as conventional instruments. Methods: Thirty patients undergoing medial UKA took part. Tibial component position was planned using a low dose CT-scan, and compared to a day 1 postoperative CT-scan to determine the difference between the planned and achieved positions. Operations were performed by one expert surgeon using PSI (Embody, London, UK). Results: The mean absolute difference between planned and achieved tibial implant positions using PSI was 2.0 degrees (SD 1.0 degrees) in the coronal plane, 1.8 degrees (SD 1.5) in the sagittal plane, and 4.5 degrees (SD 33) in the axial plane. These results were not significantly different to the 13 historical robotic cases (mean difference 0.5 degrees, 0.5 degrees, and 1.7 degrees, p = 0.1907, 0.2867 and 0.1049 respectively). PSI mean operating time was on average 62 min shorter than the robotic group (p < 0.0001) and 40 min shorter than the conventional instrument group (p < 0.0001). No complications were reported. Conclusions: In conclusion, this clinical trial demonstrates that for tibial component positioning in UKA, a novel design PSI guide in the hands of an expert surgeon, can safely deliver comparable accuracy to a robotic system, whilst being significantly faster than conventional instruments. Crown Copyright (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1421 / 1428
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty
    Fabio Conteduca
    Raffaele Iorio
    Daniele Mazza
    Andrea Ferretti
    International Orthopaedics, 2014, 38 : 259 - 265
  • [42] Patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty
    Conteduca, Fabio
    Iorio, Raffaele
    Mazza, Daniele
    Ferretti, Andrea
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 38 (02) : 259 - 265
  • [43] Total and unicompartmental knee replacement. Patient-specific Instrumentation
    Koester, G.
    Biro, C.
    ORTHOPADE, 2016, 45 (04): : 302 - +
  • [44] Patient-specific instrument for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty does not reduce the outliers in alignment or improve postoperative function: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Mingyang Li
    Yi Zeng
    Yuangang Wu
    Yuan Liu
    Wenxing Wei
    Limin Wu
    Bo-qiang Peng
    Jiayi Li
    Bin Shen
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2020, 140 : 1097 - 1107
  • [45] Patient-specific instrument for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty does not reduce the outliers in alignment or improve postoperative function: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Li, Mingyang
    Zeng, Yi
    Wu, Yuangang
    Liu, Yuan
    Wei, Wenxing
    Wu, Limin
    Peng, Bo-qiang
    Li, Jiayi
    Shen, Bin
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2020, 140 (08) : 1097 - 1107
  • [46] Improved Accuracy of Component Positioning with Robotic-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
    Bell, Stuart W.
    Anthony, Iain
    Jones, Bryn
    MacLean, Angus
    Rowe, Philip
    Blyth, Mark
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2016, 98 (08): : 627 - 635
  • [47] High accuracy in knee alignment and implant placement in unicompartmental medial knee replacement when using patient-specific instrumentation
    P. Volpi
    E. Prospero
    C. Bait
    M. Cervellin
    A. Quaglia
    A. Redaelli
    M. Denti
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2015, 23 : 1292 - 1298
  • [48] High accuracy in knee alignment and implant placement in unicompartmental medial knee replacement when using patient-specific instrumentation
    Volpi, P.
    Prospero, E.
    Bait, C.
    Cervellin, M.
    Quaglia, A.
    Redaelli, A.
    Denti, M.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2015, 23 (05) : 1292 - 1298
  • [49] Unsatisfactory Accuracy With VISIONAIRE Patient-Specific Cutting Jigs for Total Knee Arthroplasty In Reply
    Lustig, Sebastien
    Scholes, Corey J.
    Oussedik, Samir
    Coolican, Myles R. J.
    Parker, David A.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (01): : 249 - 250
  • [50] How to explain the evaluation of the accuracy of patient-specific cutting blocks for total knee arthroplasty?
    Shuo Jie
    Xiang-hong Zhang
    Xiang-sheng Zhang
    International Orthopaedics, 2015, 39 : 597 - 598