A novel patient-specific instrument design can deliver robotic level accuracy in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

被引:11
|
作者
Jones, Gareth G. [1 ]
Clarke, Susannah [1 ]
Harris, Simon [1 ]
Jaere, Martin [1 ]
Aldalmani, Thunayan [2 ]
de Klee, Patrick [1 ,3 ]
Cobb, Justin P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, MSk Lab, Charing Cross Hosp, 7th Floor,Lab Block, London W6 8RF, England
[2] Royal Coll Surgeons Ireland, 123 St Stephens Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
[3] Charing Cross Hosp, MSk Lab, Embody Orthopaed, 7th Floor,Lab Block, London W6 8RF, England
来源
KNEE | 2019年 / 26卷 / 06期
关键词
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; Partial knee replacement; Patient specific instrumentation; PSI; Robotic surgery; Robot-assisted surgery; TIBIAL COMPONENT; REPLACEMENT; ALIGNMENT; VARUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.knee.2019.08.001
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A previous randomised controlled trial (RCT) by our group found that robotic assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) surgery was significantly more accurate than conventional instrumentation. The aim of this study was to determine whether a low-cost novel PSI design could deliver the same level of accuracy as the robot in the same time efficient manner as conventional instruments. Methods: Thirty patients undergoing medial UKA took part. Tibial component position was planned using a low dose CT-scan, and compared to a day 1 postoperative CT-scan to determine the difference between the planned and achieved positions. Operations were performed by one expert surgeon using PSI (Embody, London, UK). Results: The mean absolute difference between planned and achieved tibial implant positions using PSI was 2.0 degrees (SD 1.0 degrees) in the coronal plane, 1.8 degrees (SD 1.5) in the sagittal plane, and 4.5 degrees (SD 33) in the axial plane. These results were not significantly different to the 13 historical robotic cases (mean difference 0.5 degrees, 0.5 degrees, and 1.7 degrees, p = 0.1907, 0.2867 and 0.1049 respectively). PSI mean operating time was on average 62 min shorter than the robotic group (p < 0.0001) and 40 min shorter than the conventional instrument group (p < 0.0001). No complications were reported. Conclusions: In conclusion, this clinical trial demonstrates that for tibial component positioning in UKA, a novel design PSI guide in the hands of an expert surgeon, can safely deliver comparable accuracy to a robotic system, whilst being significantly faster than conventional instruments. Crown Copyright (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1421 / 1428
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Accuracy and efficacy of osteotomy in total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific navigational template
    Gan, Yudong
    Ding, Jing
    Xu, Yongqing
    Hou, Chunlin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (08): : 12192 - 12201
  • [32] Accuracy of Patient-Specific Instrumentation Compared With Conventional Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Jiang, Jin
    Kang, Xin
    Lin, Qiao
    Teng, Yuanjun
    An, Liping
    Ma, Jingling
    Wang, Jing
    Xia, Yayi
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2015, 38 (04) : E305 - E313
  • [33] Semiactive robotic-arm system versus patient-specific instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty: Efficacy and accuracy
    He, Rui
    Sun, Maolin
    Xiong, Ran
    Yang, Junjun
    Guo, Lin
    Yang, Liu
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 46 (02) : 742 - 750
  • [34] Accuracy and early outcomes in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty performed using patient specific instrumentation
    Bell, Stuart W.
    Stoddard, James
    Bennett, Caroline
    London, Nicholas J.
    KNEE, 2014, 21 : S33 - S36
  • [35] Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty
    Leon-Munoz, Vicente J.
    Martinez-Martinez, Francisco
    Lopez-Lopez, Mirian
    Santonja-Medina, Fernando
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2019, 16 (07) : 555 - 567
  • [36] Patient-specific Instruments for Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Lachiewicz, Paul F.
    Henderson, Robert A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2013, 21 (09) : 513 - 518
  • [37] Patient-Specific Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Jauregui, Julio J.
    Cherian, Jeffrey J.
    Kapadia, Bhaveen H.
    Banerjee, Samik
    Issa, Kimona
    Harwin, Steven F.
    Mont, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2014, 27 (03) : 177 - 183
  • [38] Development of a Patient-Specific Femoral Component for Unicompartmental Knee Replacement
    Van Den Heever, D. J.
    Scheffer, C.
    Erasmus, P. J.
    Dillon, E. M.
    2009 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-20, 2009, : 5239 - +
  • [39] Patient-specific approach in total knee arthroplasty
    Lombardi, Adolph V., Jr.
    Berend, Keith R.
    Adams, Joanne B.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2008, 31 (09) : 927 - 930
  • [40] Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty
    Mathis, Dominic T.
    Hirschmann, Michael T.
    ARTHROSKOPIE, 2021, 34 (05) : 342 - 350