Patient-specific implants for lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

被引:53
|
作者
Demange, Marco K. [1 ,3 ]
Von Keudell, Arvind [1 ]
Probst, Christian [1 ]
Yoshioka, Hiroshi [2 ]
Gomoll, Andreas H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA USA
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Knee; Osteoarthritis; Unicompartmental arthroplasty; Patient-specific implants; Tibia; Lateral; Custom-made; REPLACEMENT; COMPONENT; OVERHANG; SURVIVORSHIP; SUBSIDENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00264-015-2678-x
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose The lateral compartment of the knee is biomechanically and anatomically different from the medial compartment. Most commercially available unicompartmental implants are not designed specifically for the lateral compartment. Patient-specific custom-made unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are designed to provide optimal fit on both femoral and tibial surfaces. This study aimed to determine if the use of patient-specific lateral unicompartmental implants provide better bone coverage than standard, off-the-shelf commercially available unicompartmental implants in lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasties. As a secondary question, we wished to determine if patient-specific unicompartmental implants provide good clinical outcomes in surgical treatment of lateral unicompartmental osteoarthritis. Methods We prospectively evaluated 33 patients who underwent lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty using patient-specific implants and instrumentation with a minimum of 24 months of follow-up. We analysed bone coverage observed in plain radiographs in 33 patient-specific lateral unicompartmental arthroplasties and compared to 20 lateral unicompartmental arthroplasties performed with commercially-available, standard off-the-shelf unicondylar implants. Results The mean tibial implant lateral coverage mismatch in the patient-specific implant group was 1.0 mm (S.D. 1.2, range 0-5.7 mm) versus 3.3 mm (S.D. 2.43, range 0.4-7.8 mm) in the conventional implant group (p < 0.01). In the patient specific cohort, pre-operative limb alignment was 3.3 (valgus) and post-operative limb alignment was -0.9 (varus). The Knee Society score improved from 48 (S.D. 16.2) to 95 (S.D. 7.6). Survivorship in the patient-specific implant group was 97% at an average follow up of 37 months, versus 85% at a follow-up period of 32 months for the standard implant group. Conclusions Patient-specific lateral unicompartmental knee replacements demonstrated better tibial coverage and provide excellent short-term clinical and radiological results as compared to a standard lateral UKA.
引用
收藏
页码:1519 / 1526
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient-specific implants for lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
    Marco K. Demange
    Arvind Von Keudell
    Christian Probst
    Hiroshi Yoshioka
    Andreas H. Gomoll
    International Orthopaedics, 2015, 39 : 1519 - 1526
  • [2] Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty with Use of Novel Patient-Specific Resurfacing Implants and Personalized Jigs
    Fitz, Wolfgang
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 91A : 69 - 76
  • [3] Evaluation of implant position and knee alignment after patient-specific unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
    Koeck, Franz Xaver
    Beckmann, Johannes
    Luring, Christian
    Rath, Bjoern
    Grifka, Joachim
    Basad, Erhan
    KNEE, 2011, 18 (05): : 294 - 299
  • [4] Total knee arthroplasty. Patient-specific instruments and implants
    Steinert, Andre F.
    Holzapfel, Boris M.
    Sefrin, Lukas
    Arnholdt, Joerg
    Hoberg, Maik
    Rudert, Maximilian
    ORTHOPADE, 2016, 45 (04): : 331 - +
  • [5] Patient-reported outcome after patient-specific unicondylar knee arthroplasty for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis
    Viola Freigang
    Markus Rupp
    Christian Pfeifer
    Michael Worlicek
    Stefan Radke
    Stephan Deckelmann
    Volker Alt
    Florian Baumann
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 21
  • [6] Patient-reported outcome after patient-specific unicondylar knee arthroplasty for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis
    Freigang, Viola
    Rupp, Markus
    Pfeifer, Christian
    Worlicek, Michael
    Radke, Stefan
    Deckelmann, Stephan
    Alt, Volker
    Baumann, Florian
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [7] Improved positioning of the tibial component in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with patient-specific cutting
    Mai Lan Dao Trong
    Diezi, Christian
    Goerres, Gerhard
    Helmy, Nader
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2013, 143 : 4S - 4S
  • [8] Patient-specific instrumentation and custom total knee implants in total knee arthroplasty
    Isaacson, Mark
    Bunn, Kevin
    Incavo, Stephen
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE, 2015, 26 (03): : 224 - 227
  • [9] The impact of patient-specific instrumentation on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised controlled study
    Alvand, Abtin
    Khan, Tanvir
    Jenkins, Cathy
    Rees, Jonathan L.
    Jackson, William F.
    Dodd, Christopher A. F.
    Murray, David W.
    Price, Andrew J.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2018, 26 (06) : 1662 - 1670
  • [10] Improved positioning of the tibial component in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with patient-specific cutting blocks
    Trong, M. L. Dao
    Diezi, C.
    Goerres, G.
    Helmy, N.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2015, 23 (07) : 1993 - 1998