Patient-specific implants for lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

被引:53
|
作者
Demange, Marco K. [1 ,3 ]
Von Keudell, Arvind [1 ]
Probst, Christian [1 ]
Yoshioka, Hiroshi [2 ]
Gomoll, Andreas H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA USA
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Knee; Osteoarthritis; Unicompartmental arthroplasty; Patient-specific implants; Tibia; Lateral; Custom-made; REPLACEMENT; COMPONENT; OVERHANG; SURVIVORSHIP; SUBSIDENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00264-015-2678-x
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose The lateral compartment of the knee is biomechanically and anatomically different from the medial compartment. Most commercially available unicompartmental implants are not designed specifically for the lateral compartment. Patient-specific custom-made unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are designed to provide optimal fit on both femoral and tibial surfaces. This study aimed to determine if the use of patient-specific lateral unicompartmental implants provide better bone coverage than standard, off-the-shelf commercially available unicompartmental implants in lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasties. As a secondary question, we wished to determine if patient-specific unicompartmental implants provide good clinical outcomes in surgical treatment of lateral unicompartmental osteoarthritis. Methods We prospectively evaluated 33 patients who underwent lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty using patient-specific implants and instrumentation with a minimum of 24 months of follow-up. We analysed bone coverage observed in plain radiographs in 33 patient-specific lateral unicompartmental arthroplasties and compared to 20 lateral unicompartmental arthroplasties performed with commercially-available, standard off-the-shelf unicondylar implants. Results The mean tibial implant lateral coverage mismatch in the patient-specific implant group was 1.0 mm (S.D. 1.2, range 0-5.7 mm) versus 3.3 mm (S.D. 2.43, range 0.4-7.8 mm) in the conventional implant group (p < 0.01). In the patient specific cohort, pre-operative limb alignment was 3.3 (valgus) and post-operative limb alignment was -0.9 (varus). The Knee Society score improved from 48 (S.D. 16.2) to 95 (S.D. 7.6). Survivorship in the patient-specific implant group was 97% at an average follow up of 37 months, versus 85% at a follow-up period of 32 months for the standard implant group. Conclusions Patient-specific lateral unicompartmental knee replacements demonstrated better tibial coverage and provide excellent short-term clinical and radiological results as compared to a standard lateral UKA.
引用
收藏
页码:1519 / 1526
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) showed a lower risk of failure compared to medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the Register of Prosthetic Orthopedic Implants (RIPO)
    Domenico Alesi
    Barbara Bordini
    Stefano Fratini
    Cristina Ancarani
    Piero Agostinone
    Alberto Grassi
    Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli
    Marco Viceconti
    Stefano Zaffagnini
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2023, 143 : 3363 - 3368
  • [42] Computed tomography-based patient-specific cutting guides used for positioning of the femoral component of implants during unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a cadaver study
    Junfeng Cai
    Min Ma
    Wen Zeng
    Shuling Luo
    Feng Yuan
    Feng Yin
    BMC Surgery, 23
  • [43] Computed tomography-based patient-specific cutting guides used for positioning of the femoral component of implants during unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a cadaver study
    Cai, Junfeng
    Ma, Min
    Zeng, Wen
    Luo, Shuling
    Yuan, Feng
    Yin, Feng
    BMC SURGERY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [44] A high level of satisfaction after bicompartmental individualized knee arthroplasty with patient-specific implants and instruments
    Takahiro Ogura
    Kiet Le
    Gergo Merkely
    Tim Bryant
    Tom Minas
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2019, 27 : 1487 - 1496
  • [45] A high level of satisfaction after bicompartmental individualized knee arthroplasty with patient-specific implants and instruments
    Ogura, Takahiro
    Le, Kiet
    Merkely, Gergo
    Bryant, Tim
    Minas, Tom
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2019, 27 (05) : 1487 - 1496
  • [46] Finite Element Study on the Preservation of Normal Knee Kinematics with Respect to the Prosthetic Design in Patient-Specific Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
    Koh, Yong-Gon
    Park, Kyoung-Mi
    Kang, Kyoung-Tak
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 2020
  • [47] Comparison of Functional Outcome of Total and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Using Computer-Assisted Patient-Specific Templating
    Morsy, Atef Mohamed
    Elbana, Emad Gaber
    Mostafa, Ahmed Gaber
    Edward, Mark Ashraf
    Hafez, Mahmoud A.
    ADVANCES IN ORTHOPEDICS, 2021, 2021
  • [48] Does patient-specific instrument or robot improve imaging and functional outcomes in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A bayesian analysis
    Jiao, Xufeng
    Du, Mincong
    Li, Qi
    Huang, Cheng
    Ding, Ran
    Wang, Weiguo
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2024, 144 (11) : 4827 - 4838
  • [49] Influence of tibiofemoral congruency design on the wear of patient-specific unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using finite element analysis
    Koh, Y-G
    Park, K-M
    Lee, H-Y
    Kang, K-T
    BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2019, 8 (03): : 156 - 164
  • [50] Patient-Specific Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Review
    Nam, Denis
    McArthur, Benjamin A.
    Cross, Michael B.
    Pearle, Andrew D.
    Mayman, David J.
    Haas, Steven B.
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2012, 25 (03) : 213 - 219