Patient-specific implants for lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

被引:53
|
作者
Demange, Marco K. [1 ,3 ]
Von Keudell, Arvind [1 ]
Probst, Christian [1 ]
Yoshioka, Hiroshi [2 ]
Gomoll, Andreas H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA USA
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Knee; Osteoarthritis; Unicompartmental arthroplasty; Patient-specific implants; Tibia; Lateral; Custom-made; REPLACEMENT; COMPONENT; OVERHANG; SURVIVORSHIP; SUBSIDENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00264-015-2678-x
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose The lateral compartment of the knee is biomechanically and anatomically different from the medial compartment. Most commercially available unicompartmental implants are not designed specifically for the lateral compartment. Patient-specific custom-made unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are designed to provide optimal fit on both femoral and tibial surfaces. This study aimed to determine if the use of patient-specific lateral unicompartmental implants provide better bone coverage than standard, off-the-shelf commercially available unicompartmental implants in lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasties. As a secondary question, we wished to determine if patient-specific unicompartmental implants provide good clinical outcomes in surgical treatment of lateral unicompartmental osteoarthritis. Methods We prospectively evaluated 33 patients who underwent lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty using patient-specific implants and instrumentation with a minimum of 24 months of follow-up. We analysed bone coverage observed in plain radiographs in 33 patient-specific lateral unicompartmental arthroplasties and compared to 20 lateral unicompartmental arthroplasties performed with commercially-available, standard off-the-shelf unicondylar implants. Results The mean tibial implant lateral coverage mismatch in the patient-specific implant group was 1.0 mm (S.D. 1.2, range 0-5.7 mm) versus 3.3 mm (S.D. 2.43, range 0.4-7.8 mm) in the conventional implant group (p < 0.01). In the patient specific cohort, pre-operative limb alignment was 3.3 (valgus) and post-operative limb alignment was -0.9 (varus). The Knee Society score improved from 48 (S.D. 16.2) to 95 (S.D. 7.6). Survivorship in the patient-specific implant group was 97% at an average follow up of 37 months, versus 85% at a follow-up period of 32 months for the standard implant group. Conclusions Patient-specific lateral unicompartmental knee replacements demonstrated better tibial coverage and provide excellent short-term clinical and radiological results as compared to a standard lateral UKA.
引用
收藏
页码:1519 / 1526
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient-specific instrumentation in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is reliable and accurate except for the tibial rotation
    Kerens, B.
    Leenders, A. M.
    Schotanus, M. G. M.
    Boonen, B.
    Tuinebreijer, W. E.
    Emans, P. J.
    Jong, B.
    Kort, N. P.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2018, 26 (06) : 1823 - 1830
  • [22] Patient-specific implants in reverse shoulder arthroplasty
    Haikal, Emil R.
    Fares, Mohamad Y.
    Abboud, Joseph A.
    CLINICS IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW, 2024, 27 (01): : 108 - 116
  • [23] Patient-specific medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty has a greater protective effect on articular cartilage in the lateral compartment A FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS
    Kang, K-T.
    Son, J.
    Suh, D-S.
    Kwon, S. K.
    Kwon, O-R.
    Koh, Y-G.
    BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2018, 7 (01): : 20 - 27
  • [24] Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a review
    Heyse, Thomas J.
    Tibesku, Carsten O.
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2010, 130 (12) : 1539 - 1548
  • [25] Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a review
    Thomas J. Heyse
    Carsten O. Tibesku
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2010, 130 : 1539 - 1548
  • [26] Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty - a challenge
    Walker, T.
    Aldinger, P. R.
    Streit, M. R.
    Gotterbarm, T.
    OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2017, 29 (01): : 17 - 30
  • [27] Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A review
    Buzin, Scott D.
    Geller, Jeffrey A.
    Yoon, Richard S.
    Macaulay, William
    WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS, 2021, 12 (04): : 197 - 206
  • [28] Lateral Robotic Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
    Thein, Ran
    Khamaisy, Saker
    Zuiderbaan, Hendrik A.
    Nawabi, Danyal H.
    Pearle, Andrew D.
    SPORTS MEDICINE AND ARTHROSCOPY REVIEW, 2014, 22 (04): : 223 - 228
  • [29] Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty
    Leon-Munoz, Vicente J.
    Martinez-Martinez, Francisco
    Lopez-Lopez, Mirian
    Santonja-Medina, Fernando
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2019, 16 (07) : 555 - 567
  • [30] Patient-specific Instruments for Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Lachiewicz, Paul F.
    Henderson, Robert A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2013, 21 (09) : 513 - 518