Qualitative process evaluation of the Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme (PQIP): study protocol

被引:9
|
作者
Wagstaff, Duncan [1 ,2 ]
Moonesinghe, S. Ramani [1 ,2 ]
Fulop, Naomi J. [3 ]
Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Coll Anaesthetists, Hlth Serv Res Ctr, London, England
[2] UCL, Res Dept Targeted Intervent, Ctr Perioperat Med, London, England
[3] UCL, Dept Appl Hlth Res, London, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2019年 / 9卷 / 07期
关键词
SURGICAL OUTCOMES; FEEDBACK; AUDIT; CARE; INTERVENTIONS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030214
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction The Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme (PQIP) is designed to measure complications after major elective surgery and improve these through feedback of data to clinicians. Previous research suggests that despite the significant resources which go into collecting data for national clinical audits, the information they contain is not always used effectively to improve local services. Methods and analysis We will conduct a formative process evaluation of PQIP comprising a multisited qualitative study to analyse PQIPs programme theory, barriers, facilitators and wider contextual factors that influence implementation. The research will be carried out with the PQIP project team and six National Health Service (NHS) Trusts in England, selected according to geographical location, type of hospital, size and level of engagement with PQIP. We will include one Trust which has not expressed interest in the PQIP for comparison and to explore the role of secular trend in any changes in practice. We will use semi-structured interviews (up to 144 in Trusts and 12 with the project team), non-participant observations (up to 150 hours) and documentary analysis. We will track the lifecycle of perioperative data, exploring the transformations it undergoes from creation to use. We will use framework analysis with categories both from our research questions and from themes emerging from the data. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval has been granted from the University College London Research Ethics Committee (ref 10375/001). Permissions to conduct research at NHS Trusts have been granted by local Research and Development offices in coordination with the Health Research Authority. We will follow guidelines for data security, confidentiality and information governance. Findings will be shared at regular time points with the PQIP project team to inform the implementation of the programme, and with participating NHS Trusts to help them reflect on how they currently use data for improvement of perioperative services.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme (PQIP patient study): protocol for a UK multicentre, prospective cohort study to measure quality of care and outcomes after major surgery
    S. Ramani Moonesinghe
    Dermot McGuckin
    Peter Martin
    James Bedford
    Duncan Wagstaff
    David Gilhooly
    Cristel Santos
    Jonathan Wilson
    Jenny Dorey
    Irene Leeman
    Helena Smith
    Cecilia Vindrola-Padros
    Kylie Edwards
    Georgina Singleton
    Michael Swart
    Rachel Baumber
    Arun Sahni
    Samantha Warnakulasuriya
    Ravi Vohra
    Helen Ellicott
    Anne-Marie Bougeard
    Maria Chazapis
    Aleksandra Ignacka
    Martin Cripps
    Alexandra Brent
    Sharon Drake
    James Goodwin
    Dorian Martinez
    Karen Williams
    Pritam Singh
    Matthew Bedford
    Abigail E. Vallance
    Katie Samuel
    Jose Lourtie
    Dominic Olive
    Christine Taylor
    Olga Tucker
    Giuseppe Aresu
    Andrew Swift
    Naomi Fulop
    Mike Grocott
    [J]. Perioperative Medicine, 11
  • [2] The Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme (PQIP patient study): protocol for a UK multicentre, prospective cohort study to measure quality of care and outcomes after major surgery
    Moonesinghe, S. Ramani
    McGuckin, Dermot
    Martin, Peter
    Bedford, James
    Wagstaff, Duncan
    Gilhooly, David
    Santos, Cristel
    Wilson, Jonathan
    Dorey, Jenny
    Leeman, Irene
    Smith, Helena
    Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia
    Edwards, Kylie
    Singleton, Georgina
    Swart, Michael
    Baumber, Rachel
    Sahni, Arun
    Warnakulasuriya, Samantha
    Vohra, Ravi
    Ellicott, Helen
    Bougeard, Anne-Marie
    Chazapis, Maria
    Ignacka, Aleksandra
    Cripps, Martin
    Brent, Alexandra
    Drake, Sharon
    Goodwin, James
    Martinez, Dorian
    Williams, Karen
    Singh, Pritam
    Bedford, Matthew
    Vallance, Abigail E.
    Samuel, Katie
    Lourtie, Jose
    Olive, Dominic
    Taylor, Christine
    Tucker, Olga
    Aresu, Giuseppe
    Swift, Andrew
    Fulop, Naomi
    Grocott, Mike
    [J]. PERIOPERATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [3] Clinicians' perceptions of the relevance of different Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme metrics and dissemination techniques: a qualitative study
    Imran, M.
    Sureshkumar, R.
    Sriram, N.
    Warnakulasuriya, S.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2023, 78 : 12 - 12
  • [4] The effect and process evaluations of the national quality improvement programme for palliative care: the study protocol
    Raijmakers, Natasja J. H.
    Hofstede, Jolien M.
    de Nijs, Ellen J. M.
    Deliens, Luc
    Francke, Anneke L.
    [J]. BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2014, 13
  • [5] The effect and process evaluations of the national quality improvement programme for palliative care: the study protocol
    Natasja JH Raijmakers
    Jolien M Hofstede
    Ellen JM de Nijs
    Luc Deliens
    Anneke L Francke
    [J]. BMC Palliative Care, 13
  • [6] The Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme: improving outcomes
    Gilhooly, D.
    Moonesinghe, S. R.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2018, 79 (02) : 117 - 117
  • [7] Understanding quality improvement at scale in general practice: a qualitative evaluation of a COPD improvement programme
    Marshall, Martin
    Mountford, James
    Gamet, Kirsten
    Gungor, Gulsen
    Burke, Conor
    Hudson, Robyn
    Morris, Steve
    Patel, Nishma
    Koczan, Phil
    Meaker, Rob
    Chantler, Cyril
    Roberts, Christopher Michael
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2014, 64 (629): : E745 - E751
  • [8] Why is reporting quality improvement so hard? A qualitative study in perioperative care
    Jones, Emma Leanne
    Dixon-Woods, Mary
    Martin, Graham P.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (07):
  • [9] Implementing a quality improvement programme in palliative care in care homes: a qualitative study
    Sue Hall
    Cassie Goddard
    Frances Stewart
    Irene J Higginson
    [J]. BMC Geriatrics, 11
  • [10] Implementing a quality improvement programme in palliative care in care homes: a qualitative study
    Hall, Sue
    Goddard, Cassie
    Stewart, Frances
    Higginson, Irene J.
    [J]. BMC GERIATRICS, 2011, 11