Qualitative process evaluation of the Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme (PQIP): study protocol

被引:9
|
作者
Wagstaff, Duncan [1 ,2 ]
Moonesinghe, S. Ramani [1 ,2 ]
Fulop, Naomi J. [3 ]
Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Coll Anaesthetists, Hlth Serv Res Ctr, London, England
[2] UCL, Res Dept Targeted Intervent, Ctr Perioperat Med, London, England
[3] UCL, Dept Appl Hlth Res, London, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2019年 / 9卷 / 07期
关键词
SURGICAL OUTCOMES; FEEDBACK; AUDIT; CARE; INTERVENTIONS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030214
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction The Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme (PQIP) is designed to measure complications after major elective surgery and improve these through feedback of data to clinicians. Previous research suggests that despite the significant resources which go into collecting data for national clinical audits, the information they contain is not always used effectively to improve local services. Methods and analysis We will conduct a formative process evaluation of PQIP comprising a multisited qualitative study to analyse PQIPs programme theory, barriers, facilitators and wider contextual factors that influence implementation. The research will be carried out with the PQIP project team and six National Health Service (NHS) Trusts in England, selected according to geographical location, type of hospital, size and level of engagement with PQIP. We will include one Trust which has not expressed interest in the PQIP for comparison and to explore the role of secular trend in any changes in practice. We will use semi-structured interviews (up to 144 in Trusts and 12 with the project team), non-participant observations (up to 150 hours) and documentary analysis. We will track the lifecycle of perioperative data, exploring the transformations it undergoes from creation to use. We will use framework analysis with categories both from our research questions and from themes emerging from the data. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval has been granted from the University College London Research Ethics Committee (ref 10375/001). Permissions to conduct research at NHS Trusts have been granted by local Research and Development offices in coordination with the Health Research Authority. We will follow guidelines for data security, confidentiality and information governance. Findings will be shared at regular time points with the PQIP project team to inform the implementation of the programme, and with participating NHS Trusts to help them reflect on how they currently use data for improvement of perioperative services.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Role of Dutch internal policy advisors in a hospital quality improvement programme and their influence on nurses' role development: a qualitative study
    van Schothorst, Jannine
    van Roekel
    Weggelaar, Anne Marie J. W. M.
    Jansen
    Hilders, Carina C. G. J. M.
    Wallenburg, Iris
    de Bont, Antoinette
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (09):
  • [42] Peer review in MRI: A quality improvement programme and pilot study
    Paul, J. M.
    Stewart, S. L.
    RADIOGRAPHY, 2021, 27 (02) : 398 - 403
  • [43] Exploring clinicians' perspectives on the 'Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury Care Bundle' national quality improvement programme: a qualitative study
    Bidwell, Posy
    Thakar, Ranee
    Gurol-Urganci, Ipek
    Harris, James M.
    Silverton, Louise
    Hellyer, Alexandra
    Freeman, Robert
    Morris, Edward
    Novis, Vivienne
    Sevdalis, Nick
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (09):
  • [44] Plagiarism: A case study of quality improvement in a taught postgraduate programme
    Marshall, Tom
    Taylor, Beck
    Hothersall, Ellie
    Perez-Martin, Leticia
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2011, 33 (07) : E375 - E381
  • [45] Evaluation of a dementia awareness programme in UK schools: a qualitative study
    Farina, N.
    Hughes, L. J.
    Jones, E.
    Parveen, S.
    Griffiths, A. W.
    Galvin, K.
    Banerjee, S.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 185 : 348 - 355
  • [46] A Quality Improvement Process to Increase and Sustain a Peritoneal Dialysis Programme in the United Kingdom
    Shah, Nihit
    Cole, Ann
    McCarthy, Kate
    Baharani, Jyoti
    BLOOD PURIFICATION, 2022, 51 (12) : 1022 - 1030
  • [47] Factors influencing change in clinical practice A qualitative evaluation of the implementation of the quality improvement in colonoscopy study
    Rajasekhar, Praveen T.
    Rees, Colin J.
    Nixon, Catherine
    East, James E.
    Brown, Sally
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2016, 29 (01) : 5 - 15
  • [48] The Quality of the Maternity Triage Process: a Qualitative Study
    Rashidi-Fakari, Farzaneh
    Simbar, Masoumeh
    Safari, Saeed
    Zadeh-Modares, Shahrzad
    Alavi-Majd, Hamid
    ADVANCED JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 4 (01)
  • [49] The Implementation and Evaluation of an Evidence-Based Protocol to Treat Diabetic Ketoacidosis A Quality Improvement Study
    Evans, Kathryn J.
    Thompson, Julie
    Spratt, Susan E.
    Lien, Lillian F.
    Vorderstrasse, Allison
    ADVANCED EMERGENCY NURSING JOURNAL, 2014, 36 (02) : 189 - 198
  • [50] Safer Baby Bundle: study protocol for the economic evaluation of a quality improvement initiative to reduce stillbirths
    Callander, Emily Joy
    Andrews, Christine
    Sketcher-Baker, Kirstine
    Nicholl, Michael Christopher
    Farrell, Tanya
    Karger, Shae
    Flenady, Vicki
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (08):