Qualitative process evaluation of the Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme (PQIP): study protocol

被引:9
|
作者
Wagstaff, Duncan [1 ,2 ]
Moonesinghe, S. Ramani [1 ,2 ]
Fulop, Naomi J. [3 ]
Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Coll Anaesthetists, Hlth Serv Res Ctr, London, England
[2] UCL, Res Dept Targeted Intervent, Ctr Perioperat Med, London, England
[3] UCL, Dept Appl Hlth Res, London, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2019年 / 9卷 / 07期
关键词
SURGICAL OUTCOMES; FEEDBACK; AUDIT; CARE; INTERVENTIONS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030214
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction The Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme (PQIP) is designed to measure complications after major elective surgery and improve these through feedback of data to clinicians. Previous research suggests that despite the significant resources which go into collecting data for national clinical audits, the information they contain is not always used effectively to improve local services. Methods and analysis We will conduct a formative process evaluation of PQIP comprising a multisited qualitative study to analyse PQIPs programme theory, barriers, facilitators and wider contextual factors that influence implementation. The research will be carried out with the PQIP project team and six National Health Service (NHS) Trusts in England, selected according to geographical location, type of hospital, size and level of engagement with PQIP. We will include one Trust which has not expressed interest in the PQIP for comparison and to explore the role of secular trend in any changes in practice. We will use semi-structured interviews (up to 144 in Trusts and 12 with the project team), non-participant observations (up to 150 hours) and documentary analysis. We will track the lifecycle of perioperative data, exploring the transformations it undergoes from creation to use. We will use framework analysis with categories both from our research questions and from themes emerging from the data. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval has been granted from the University College London Research Ethics Committee (ref 10375/001). Permissions to conduct research at NHS Trusts have been granted by local Research and Development offices in coordination with the Health Research Authority. We will follow guidelines for data security, confidentiality and information governance. Findings will be shared at regular time points with the PQIP project team to inform the implementation of the programme, and with participating NHS Trusts to help them reflect on how they currently use data for improvement of perioperative services.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Process quality improvement of a qualitative response with dynamic characteristic
    Hsieh, Kun-Lin
    Tong, Lee-Ing
    International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2005, 25 (11-12): : 1180 - 1190
  • [22] EVALUATION OF STUDY PROGRAMME EXTERNAL QUALITY
    Sproge, Sandra
    RESEARCH FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT 2011, VOL 1, 2011, : 179 - 185
  • [23] Evaluation of a Physical Health Plan for people with psychosis: Protocol for a Quality Improvement study
    Williams, Julie
    Sevdalis, Nick
    Gaughran, Fiona
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2019, 14
  • [24] Evaluation of a Physical health plan for people with psychosis: a protocol for a quality improvement study
    Julie Williams
    Nick Sevdalis
    Fiona Gaughran
    Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 5
  • [25] Evaluation of a Physical health plan for people with psychosis: a protocol for a quality improvement study
    Williams, Julie
    Sevdalis, Nick
    Gaughran, Fiona
    PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIES, 2019, 5 (01)
  • [26] Increasing the use of perioperative risk scoring in emergency laparotomy: nationwide quality improvement programme
    Nally, Deirdre M.
    Lonergan, Peter E.
    O'Connell, Emer P.
    McNamara, Deborah A.
    BJS OPEN, 2022, 6 (04):
  • [27] Importance of Team Functioning as a Target of Quality Improvement Initiatives in Nursing Homes: A Qualitative Process Evaluation
    Desveaux, Laura
    Halko, Roxanne
    Marani, Husayn
    Feldman, Sid
    Ivers, Noah M.
    JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2019, 39 (01) : 21 - 28
  • [28] INCORPORATION OF UNIVERSAL PREVENTION CURRICULUM INTO ESTABLISHED ACADEMIC DEGREE STUDY PROGRAMME: QUALITATIVE PROCESS EVALUATION
    Miovsky, Michel
    Vondrova, Anna
    Gabrhelik, Roman
    Sloboda, Zili
    Libra, Jiri
    Lososova, Amalie
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 27 : S74 - S82
  • [29] Describing methods and interventions: A protocol for the systematic analysis of the perioperative quality improvement literature
    Jones E.
    Lees N.
    Martin G.
    Dixon-Woods M.
    Systematic Reviews, 3 (1)
  • [30] Does the EUA institutional evaluation programme contribute to quality improvement?
    Amado Tavares, Diana
    Joao Rosa, Maria
    Amaral, Alberto
    QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION, 2010, 18 (03) : 178 - +