Qualitative process evaluation of the Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme (PQIP): study protocol

被引:9
|
作者
Wagstaff, Duncan [1 ,2 ]
Moonesinghe, S. Ramani [1 ,2 ]
Fulop, Naomi J. [3 ]
Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Coll Anaesthetists, Hlth Serv Res Ctr, London, England
[2] UCL, Res Dept Targeted Intervent, Ctr Perioperat Med, London, England
[3] UCL, Dept Appl Hlth Res, London, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2019年 / 9卷 / 07期
关键词
SURGICAL OUTCOMES; FEEDBACK; AUDIT; CARE; INTERVENTIONS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030214
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction The Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme (PQIP) is designed to measure complications after major elective surgery and improve these through feedback of data to clinicians. Previous research suggests that despite the significant resources which go into collecting data for national clinical audits, the information they contain is not always used effectively to improve local services. Methods and analysis We will conduct a formative process evaluation of PQIP comprising a multisited qualitative study to analyse PQIPs programme theory, barriers, facilitators and wider contextual factors that influence implementation. The research will be carried out with the PQIP project team and six National Health Service (NHS) Trusts in England, selected according to geographical location, type of hospital, size and level of engagement with PQIP. We will include one Trust which has not expressed interest in the PQIP for comparison and to explore the role of secular trend in any changes in practice. We will use semi-structured interviews (up to 144 in Trusts and 12 with the project team), non-participant observations (up to 150 hours) and documentary analysis. We will track the lifecycle of perioperative data, exploring the transformations it undergoes from creation to use. We will use framework analysis with categories both from our research questions and from themes emerging from the data. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval has been granted from the University College London Research Ethics Committee (ref 10375/001). Permissions to conduct research at NHS Trusts have been granted by local Research and Development offices in coordination with the Health Research Authority. We will follow guidelines for data security, confidentiality and information governance. Findings will be shared at regular time points with the PQIP project team to inform the implementation of the programme, and with participating NHS Trusts to help them reflect on how they currently use data for improvement of perioperative services.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of a rapid implementation quality improvement programme for medicine security
    Gilbert, Alice V.
    Roberts, Michael
    Williams, Des
    Gilbert, Andrew Leigh
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2015, 24 : 95 - 95
  • [32] Development and evaluation of a national gentamicin and vancomycin quality improvement programme
    Semple, Yvonne
    Bennie, Marion
    Sneddon, Jacqueline
    Cockburn, Alison
    Seaton, R. Andrew
    Thomson, Alison H.
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2020, 75 (07) : 1998 - 2003
  • [33] ONT Quality control programme for the donation process evaluation
    Cuende, N
    Cañón, JF
    Alonso, M
    Martín, C
    Sagredo, E
    Miranda, B
    NEFROLOGIA, 2003, 23 : 28 - 31
  • [34] Formative independent evaluation of a digital change programme in the English National Health Service: study protocol for a longitudinal qualitative study
    Cresswell, Kathrin
    Sheikh, Aziz
    Dean Franklin, Bryony
    Krasuska, Marta
    Nguyen, Hung
    Hinder, Susan
    Lane, Wendy
    Mozaffar, Hajar
    Mason, Kathy
    Eason, Sally
    Potts, Henry
    Williams, Robin
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (10):
  • [35] Quality assurance and a qualitative evaluation of the KMUTT-UT twinning programme
    Beasley, A
    Bullen, F
    Payothornsiri, S
    Petchgate, K
    Tungboonterm, P
    3RD ASIA-PACIFIC FORUM ON ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION, FORUM PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 77 - 80
  • [36] Software process improvement by process monitoring and quality evaluation activities
    Fukushima, Toshihiko
    Yamada, Shigeru
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEM ASSURANCE ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 1 (04) : 284 - 292
  • [37] A multifaceted quality improvement intervention for CVD risk management in Australian primary healthcare: a protocol for a process evaluation
    Bindu Patel
    Anushka Patel
    Stephen Jan
    Tim Usherwood
    Mark Harris
    Katie Panaretto
    Nicholas Zwar
    Julie Redfern
    Jesse Jansen
    Jenny Doust
    David Peiris
    Implementation Science, 9
  • [38] A multifaceted quality improvement intervention for CVD risk management in Australian primary healthcare: a protocol for a process evaluation
    Patel, Bindu
    Patel, Anushka
    Jan, Stephen
    Usherwood, Tim
    Harris, Mark
    Panaretto, Katie
    Zwar, Nicholas
    Redfern, Julie
    Jansen, Jesse
    Doust, Jenny
    Peiris, David
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2014, 9 : 187
  • [39] Improving the management of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: systematic evaluation of a quality improvement programme European QUality Improvement Programme for Acute Coronary Syndrome: The EQUIP-ACS project protocol and design
    Flather, Marcus D.
    Booth, Jean
    Babalis, Daphne
    Bueno, Hector
    Steg, Philippe G.
    Opolski, Grzegorz
    Ottani, Filippo
    Machecourt, Jacques
    Bardaji, Alfredo
    Bojestig, Mats
    Brady, Anthony R.
    Lindahl, Bertil
    TRIALS, 2010, 11
  • [40] A Preliminary Qualitative Evaluation of the Virginia Gold Quality Improvement Program
    Craver, Gerald A.
    Burkett, Amy K.
    QUALITATIVE REPORT, 2012, 17 (41)