Understanding quality improvement at scale in general practice: a qualitative evaluation of a COPD improvement programme

被引:8
|
作者
Marshall, Martin [1 ]
Mountford, James [2 ]
Gamet, Kirsten [3 ]
Gungor, Gulsen [4 ]
Burke, Conor [5 ]
Hudson, Robyn [6 ]
Morris, Steve [1 ]
Patel, Nishma [1 ]
Koczan, Phil [2 ]
Meaker, Rob [5 ]
Chantler, Cyril [2 ]
Roberts, Christopher Michael [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] UCL, London WC1E 6BT, England
[2] UCLPartners, London W1T 7HA, England
[3] Patients Know Best, Cambridge, England
[4] NHS Redbridge Clin Commissioning Grp, Ilford, Essex, England
[5] Barking & Dagenham, Redbridge & Havering Clin Commissioning Grp, Romford, Essex, England
[6] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] UCLPartners, Integrated Comorbid Programme, London W1T 7HA, England
[8] Barts Hlth NHS Trust, London, England
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE | 2014年 / 64卷 / 629期
关键词
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; general practice; large-scale improvement; ORGANIZATIONS; INTERVENTION; TEAMS;
D O I
10.3399/bjgp14X682801
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background A growing body of knowledge exists to guide efforts to improve the organisation and delivery of health care, most of which is based on work carried out in hospitals. It is uncertain how transferable this knowledge is to primary care. Aim To understand the enablers and constraints to implementing a large-scale quality improvement programme in general practice, designed to improve care for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Design and setting A qualitative study of 189 general practices in a socioeconomically and ethnically-mixed, urban area in east London, UK. Method Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with people leading the programme and 17 in-depth interviews with those participating in it. Participants were local health system leaders, clinicians, and managers. A theoretical framework derived from evidence-based guidance for improvement programmes was used to interpret the findings. A complex improvement intervention took place with social and technical elements including training and mentorship, guidance, analytical tools, and data feedback. Results Practice staff wanted to participate in and learn from well-designed collaborative improvement projects. Nevertheless, there were limitations in the capacities and capabilities of the workforce to undertake systematic improvement, significant problems with access to and the quality of data, and tensions between the narrative-based generalist orientation of many primary care clinicians and the quantitative single-disease orientation that has characterised much of the quality improvement movement to date. Conclusion Improvement guidance derived largely from hospital-based studies is, for the most part, applicable to improvement efforts in primary care settings, although large-scale change in general practice presents some particular challenges. These need to be better understood and addressed if improvement initiatives are to be effective.
引用
收藏
页码:E745 / E751
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reducing missed appointments in general practice: evaluation of a quality improvement programme in East London
    Margham, Tom
    Williams, Crystal
    Steadman, Jack
    Hull, Sally
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2021, 71 (702): : E31 - E38
  • [2] Quality improvement in general practice
    Wilmot, J
    Davies, C
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 1997, 47 (419): : 343 - 344
  • [3] The role of quality improvement collaboratives in general practice: a qualitative systematic review
    Knight, Andrew Walter
    Tam, Chun Wah Michael
    Dennis, Sarah
    Fraser, John
    Pond, Dimity
    BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2022, 11 (02)
  • [4] An evaluation of the clinical microsystems approach in general practice quality improvement
    Abrahamson, Vanessa
    Jaswal, Sabrena
    Wilson, Patricia M.
    PRIMARY HEALTH CARE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 21
  • [5] Quality improvement in community pharmacy: a qualitative investigation of the impact of a postgraduate quality improvement educational module on pharmacists understanding and practice
    Latif, Asam
    Gulzar, Nargis
    Gohil, Sejal
    Ansong, Theo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2021, 29 (01) : 84 - 89
  • [6] Qualitative process evaluation of the Perioperative Quality Improvement Programme (PQIP): study protocol
    Wagstaff, Duncan
    Moonesinghe, S. Ramani
    Fulop, Naomi J.
    Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (07):
  • [8] Data quality improvement in general practice
    Brouwer, H. J.
    Bindels, P. J. E.
    Van Weert, H. C.
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2006, 23 (05) : 529 - 536
  • [9] Communities of practice Quality improvement or research in general practice
    Jiwa, Moyez
    Ping-Delfos, Wendy Chan She
    Ross, Jackie
    Shaw, Tim
    Magin, Parker
    AUSTRALIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2011, 40 (1-2) : 72 - 75