Understanding quality improvement at scale in general practice: a qualitative evaluation of a COPD improvement programme

被引:8
|
作者
Marshall, Martin [1 ]
Mountford, James [2 ]
Gamet, Kirsten [3 ]
Gungor, Gulsen [4 ]
Burke, Conor [5 ]
Hudson, Robyn [6 ]
Morris, Steve [1 ]
Patel, Nishma [1 ]
Koczan, Phil [2 ]
Meaker, Rob [5 ]
Chantler, Cyril [2 ]
Roberts, Christopher Michael [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] UCL, London WC1E 6BT, England
[2] UCLPartners, London W1T 7HA, England
[3] Patients Know Best, Cambridge, England
[4] NHS Redbridge Clin Commissioning Grp, Ilford, Essex, England
[5] Barking & Dagenham, Redbridge & Havering Clin Commissioning Grp, Romford, Essex, England
[6] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] UCLPartners, Integrated Comorbid Programme, London W1T 7HA, England
[8] Barts Hlth NHS Trust, London, England
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE | 2014年 / 64卷 / 629期
关键词
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; general practice; large-scale improvement; ORGANIZATIONS; INTERVENTION; TEAMS;
D O I
10.3399/bjgp14X682801
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background A growing body of knowledge exists to guide efforts to improve the organisation and delivery of health care, most of which is based on work carried out in hospitals. It is uncertain how transferable this knowledge is to primary care. Aim To understand the enablers and constraints to implementing a large-scale quality improvement programme in general practice, designed to improve care for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Design and setting A qualitative study of 189 general practices in a socioeconomically and ethnically-mixed, urban area in east London, UK. Method Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with people leading the programme and 17 in-depth interviews with those participating in it. Participants were local health system leaders, clinicians, and managers. A theoretical framework derived from evidence-based guidance for improvement programmes was used to interpret the findings. A complex improvement intervention took place with social and technical elements including training and mentorship, guidance, analytical tools, and data feedback. Results Practice staff wanted to participate in and learn from well-designed collaborative improvement projects. Nevertheless, there were limitations in the capacities and capabilities of the workforce to undertake systematic improvement, significant problems with access to and the quality of data, and tensions between the narrative-based generalist orientation of many primary care clinicians and the quantitative single-disease orientation that has characterised much of the quality improvement movement to date. Conclusion Improvement guidance derived largely from hospital-based studies is, for the most part, applicable to improvement efforts in primary care settings, although large-scale change in general practice presents some particular challenges. These need to be better understood and addressed if improvement initiatives are to be effective.
引用
收藏
页码:E745 / E751
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of the introduction of QOF quality improvement modules in English general practice: early findings from a rapid, qualitative exploration of implementation
    Bramwell, Donna
    Hotham, Sarah
    Peckham, Stephen
    Checkland, Kath
    Forbes, Lindsay J. L.
    BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2022, 11 (03)
  • [22] Interdependencies or integration? A qualitative evaluation of a national emergency department improvement programme
    Jones, Katie
    Rance, Jaynie Y.
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2023, 31 (01) : 49 - 63
  • [23] Room for improvement? Leadership, innovation culture and uptake of quality improvement methods in general practice
    Apekey, Tanefa A.
    McSorley, Gerry
    Tilling, Michelle
    Siriwardena, A. Niroshan
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2011, 17 (02) : 311 - 318
  • [24] UNDERSTANDING QUALITY IMPROVEMENT
    Bukstein, Oscar Gary
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 56 (10): : S26 - S26
  • [25] Developing programme theories as part of a realist evaluation of a healthcare quality improvement programme
    Feather, Julie Louise
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARE COORDINATION, 2018, 21 (03) : 68 - 72
  • [26] Evaluating the implementation of a quality improvement process in General Practice using a realist evaluation framework
    Moule, Pam
    Clompus, Susan
    Fieldhouse, Jon
    Ellis-Jones, Julie
    Barker, Jacqueline
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 24 (04) : 701 - 707
  • [27] Does the EUA institutional evaluation programme contribute to quality improvement?
    Amado Tavares, Diana
    Joao Rosa, Maria
    Amaral, Alberto
    QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION, 2010, 18 (03) : 178 - +
  • [28] Evaluation of a rapid implementation quality improvement programme for medicine security
    Gilbert, Alice V.
    Roberts, Michael
    Williams, Des
    Gilbert, Andrew Leigh
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2015, 24 : 95 - 95
  • [29] Development and evaluation of a national gentamicin and vancomycin quality improvement programme
    Semple, Yvonne
    Bennie, Marion
    Sneddon, Jacqueline
    Cockburn, Alison
    Seaton, R. Andrew
    Thomson, Alison H.
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2020, 75 (07) : 1998 - 2003
  • [30] Evaluation of the Irish National COPD Collaborative Quality Improvement Initiative
    Woods, O.
    Prihodova, L.
    MacDonell, R.
    Brennan, J.
    Costello, R.
    McDonnell, T.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 188 (SUPPL 10) : 301 - 301