Comparison of clinical outcomes following minimally invasive or lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression

被引:76
|
作者
McGrath, Lynn B., Jr. [1 ]
White-Dzuro, Gabrielle A. [1 ]
Hofstetter, Christoph P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Neurol Surg, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
full-endoscopic spine surgery; stenosis; radiculopathy; minimally invasive spine surgery; MIS; unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression; lumbar; LOW-BACK-PAIN; SPINAL STENOSIS; NONSURGICAL MANAGEMENT; FUSION SURGERY; LAMINECTOMY; INSTABILITY; COMPLICATIONS; DISABILITY; QUALITY; COST;
D O I
10.3171/2018.9.SPINE18689
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE Minimally invasive lumbar unilateral tubular laminotomy for bilateral decompression has gradually gained acceptance as a less destabilizing but efficacious and safe alternative to traditional open decompression techniques. The authors have further advanced the principles of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) by utilizing working-channel endoscope-based techniques. Full-endoscopic technique allows for high-resolution off-axis visualization of neural structures within the lateral recess, thereby minimizing the need for facet joint resection. The relative efficacy and safety of MIS and full-endoscopic techniques have not been directly compared. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 95 consecutive patients undergoing either MIS (n = 45) or endoscopic (n = 50) unilateral laminotomies for bilateral decompression in cases of lumbar spinal stenosis was performed. Patient demographics, operative details, clinical outcomes, and complications were reviewed. RESULTS The patient cohort consisted of 41 female and 54 male patients whose average age was 62 years. Half of the patients had single-level, one-third had 2-level, and the remaining patients had 3- or 4-level procedures. The surgical time for endoscopic technique was significantly longer per level compared to MIS (161.8 +/- 6.8 minutes vs 99.3 +/- 4.6 minutes; p < 0.001). Hospital stay for MIS patients was on average 2.4 +/- 0.5 days compared to 0.7 +/- 0.1 days for endoscopic patients (p = 0.001). At the 1-year follow-up, endoscopic patients had a significantly lower visual analog scale score for leg pain than MIS patients (1.3 +/- 0.3 vs 3.0 +/- 0.5; p < 0.01). Moreover, the back pain disability index score was significantly lower in the endoscopic cohort than in the MIS cohort (20.7 +/- 3.4 vs 35.9 +/- 4.1; p < 0.01). Two patients in the MIS group (epidural hematoma) and one patient in the endoscopic group (disc herniation) required a return to the operating room acutely after surgery (< 14 days). CONCLUSIONS Lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression is a safe and effective surgical procedure with favorable complication profile and patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 499
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Biportal endoscopic unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy
    Kim, Jiyeon
    Heo, Dong Hwa
    Lee, Dong Chan
    Chung, Hung Tae
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2021, 163 (09) : 2537 - 2543
  • [42] Clinical Efficacy of Posterior Percutaneous Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy with Bilateral Decompression for Symptomatic Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
    Zhao, Xiao-bing
    Ma, Ya-jie
    Ma, Hai-jun
    Zhang, Xin-yu
    Zhou, Hong-gang
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2022, 14 (05) : 876 - 884
  • [43] Biportal endoscopic unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy
    Jiyeon Kim
    Dong Hwa Heo
    Dong Chan Lee
    Hung Tae Chung
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2021, 163 : 2537 - 2543
  • [44] Methylprednisolone Following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression
    Florence, T. J.
    Say, Irene
    Rivera, Joshua
    Kim, Jiyoon
    Li, Gang
    Holly, Langston T.
    Lu, Daniel C.
    SPINE, 2024, 49 (07) : 506 - 512
  • [45] Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Bilateral Decompression with a Unilateral Approach (endo-BiDUA) for Elderly Patients with Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis
    Wada, K.
    Sairyo, K.
    Sakai, T.
    Yasui, N.
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2010, 53 (02) : 65 - 68
  • [46] A Prospective Comparative Study of 2 Minimally Invasive Decompression Procedures for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression (ULBD) Versus Muscle-Preserving Interlaminar Decompression (MILD)
    Arai, Yoshiyasu
    Hirai, Takashi
    Yoshii, Toshitaka
    Sakai, Kenichiro
    Kato, Tsuyoshi
    Enomoto, Mitsuhiro
    Matsumoto, Renpei
    Yamada, Tsuyoshi
    Kawabata, Shigenori
    Shinomiya, Kenichi
    Okawa, Atsushi
    SPINE, 2014, 39 (04) : 332 - 340
  • [47] Impact of Sarcopenia on Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Surgery
    Toyoda, Hiromitsu
    Hoshino, Masatoshi
    Ohyama, Shoichiro
    Terai, Hidetomi
    Suzuki, Akinobu
    Yamada, Kentaro
    Takahashi, Shinji
    Hayashi, Kazunori
    Tamai, Koji
    Hori, Yusuke
    Nakamura, Hiroaki
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [48] Impact of Sarcopenia on Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Surgery
    Hiromitsu Toyoda
    Masatoshi Hoshino
    Shoichiro Ohyama
    Hidetomi Terai
    Akinobu Suzuki
    Kentaro Yamada
    Shinji Takahashi
    Kazunori Hayashi
    Koji Tamai
    Yusuke Hori
    Hiroaki Nakamura
    Scientific Reports, 9
  • [49] Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression Outside-In Approach: A Proctorship Guideline With 12 Steps of Effectiveness and Safety
    Kim, Hyeun-Sung
    Wu, Pang Hung
    Jang, Il-Tae
    NEUROSPINE, 2020, 17 : S99 - S109
  • [50] Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosisPart I: Anatomical and surgical considerations
    U. Spetzger
    H. Bertalanffy
    C. Naujokat
    D. G. v. Keyserlingk
    J. M. Gilsbach
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 1997, 139 : 392 - 396