Comparison of clinical outcomes following minimally invasive or lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression

被引:76
|
作者
McGrath, Lynn B., Jr. [1 ]
White-Dzuro, Gabrielle A. [1 ]
Hofstetter, Christoph P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Neurol Surg, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
full-endoscopic spine surgery; stenosis; radiculopathy; minimally invasive spine surgery; MIS; unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression; lumbar; LOW-BACK-PAIN; SPINAL STENOSIS; NONSURGICAL MANAGEMENT; FUSION SURGERY; LAMINECTOMY; INSTABILITY; COMPLICATIONS; DISABILITY; QUALITY; COST;
D O I
10.3171/2018.9.SPINE18689
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE Minimally invasive lumbar unilateral tubular laminotomy for bilateral decompression has gradually gained acceptance as a less destabilizing but efficacious and safe alternative to traditional open decompression techniques. The authors have further advanced the principles of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) by utilizing working-channel endoscope-based techniques. Full-endoscopic technique allows for high-resolution off-axis visualization of neural structures within the lateral recess, thereby minimizing the need for facet joint resection. The relative efficacy and safety of MIS and full-endoscopic techniques have not been directly compared. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 95 consecutive patients undergoing either MIS (n = 45) or endoscopic (n = 50) unilateral laminotomies for bilateral decompression in cases of lumbar spinal stenosis was performed. Patient demographics, operative details, clinical outcomes, and complications were reviewed. RESULTS The patient cohort consisted of 41 female and 54 male patients whose average age was 62 years. Half of the patients had single-level, one-third had 2-level, and the remaining patients had 3- or 4-level procedures. The surgical time for endoscopic technique was significantly longer per level compared to MIS (161.8 +/- 6.8 minutes vs 99.3 +/- 4.6 minutes; p < 0.001). Hospital stay for MIS patients was on average 2.4 +/- 0.5 days compared to 0.7 +/- 0.1 days for endoscopic patients (p = 0.001). At the 1-year follow-up, endoscopic patients had a significantly lower visual analog scale score for leg pain than MIS patients (1.3 +/- 0.3 vs 3.0 +/- 0.5; p < 0.01). Moreover, the back pain disability index score was significantly lower in the endoscopic cohort than in the MIS cohort (20.7 +/- 3.4 vs 35.9 +/- 4.1; p < 0.01). Two patients in the MIS group (epidural hematoma) and one patient in the endoscopic group (disc herniation) required a return to the operating room acutely after surgery (< 14 days). CONCLUSIONS Lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression is a safe and effective surgical procedure with favorable complication profile and patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 499
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis .2. Clinical experiences
    Spetzger, U
    Bertalanffy, H
    Reinges, MHT
    Gilsbach, JM
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 1997, 139 (05) : 397 - 403
  • [22] Early Clinical and Radiologic Evaluation of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy and Bilateral Decompression in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Study
    Yin, Jianjian
    Ma, Tao
    Gao, Gongming
    Chen, Qi
    Nong, Luming
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART A-CENTRAL EUROPEAN NEUROSURGERY, 2024,
  • [23] Outcome analysis of lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression in patients with degenerative lumbar central canal stenosis
    Wu, Meng-Huang
    Wu, Po-Chien
    Lee, Ching-Yu
    Lin, Yen-Kuang
    Huang, Tsung-Jen
    Lin, Cheng-Li
    Lin, Chang-Hao
    Huang, Yi-Hung
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 21 (01): : 122 - 133
  • [24] Clinical efficacy and imaging outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopy with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression in the treatment of severe lumbar spinal stenosis
    Hu, Yutong
    Fu, Hao
    Yang, Dongfang
    Xu, Weibing
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 9
  • [25] Radiologic Efficacy and Patient Satisfaction after Minimally Invasive Unilateral Laminotomy and Bilateral Decompression in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Analysis
    Kim, Seung-Kook
    Ryu, Sungmo
    Kim, Eun-Sang
    Lee, Sun-Ho
    Lee, Su-Chan
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART A-CENTRAL EUROPEAN NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 81 (06) : 475 - 483
  • [26] Clinical Efficacy of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy with Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression
    Zhang, Zhenhao
    Cui, Wei
    Dong, Yibo
    Yu, Yang
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2025, 193 : 142 - 144
  • [28] Bilateral laminotomy through a unilateral approach (minimally invasive) versus open laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis
    Horan, Jack
    Ben Husien, Mohammed
    Bolger, Ciaran
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 35 (02) : 161 - 165
  • [29] The Influence of Sex on Clinical Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression
    Nolte, Michael T.
    Jenkins, Nathaniel W.
    Parrish, James M.
    Mohan, Shruthi
    Geoghegan, Cara E.
    Jadczak, Caroline N.
    Hrynewycz, Nadia M.
    Singh, Kern
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2021, 15 (04): : 763 - 769
  • [30] BILATERAL LAMINOTOMY THROUGH A UNILATERAL APPROACH (MINIMALLY INVASIVE) VS OPEN LAMINECTOMY FOR LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS
    Horan, J.
    Husein, M. B.
    Bolger, C.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 90 (03): : E2 - E3