Comparison of clinical outcomes following minimally invasive or lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression

被引:76
|
作者
McGrath, Lynn B., Jr. [1 ]
White-Dzuro, Gabrielle A. [1 ]
Hofstetter, Christoph P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Neurol Surg, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
full-endoscopic spine surgery; stenosis; radiculopathy; minimally invasive spine surgery; MIS; unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression; lumbar; LOW-BACK-PAIN; SPINAL STENOSIS; NONSURGICAL MANAGEMENT; FUSION SURGERY; LAMINECTOMY; INSTABILITY; COMPLICATIONS; DISABILITY; QUALITY; COST;
D O I
10.3171/2018.9.SPINE18689
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE Minimally invasive lumbar unilateral tubular laminotomy for bilateral decompression has gradually gained acceptance as a less destabilizing but efficacious and safe alternative to traditional open decompression techniques. The authors have further advanced the principles of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) by utilizing working-channel endoscope-based techniques. Full-endoscopic technique allows for high-resolution off-axis visualization of neural structures within the lateral recess, thereby minimizing the need for facet joint resection. The relative efficacy and safety of MIS and full-endoscopic techniques have not been directly compared. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 95 consecutive patients undergoing either MIS (n = 45) or endoscopic (n = 50) unilateral laminotomies for bilateral decompression in cases of lumbar spinal stenosis was performed. Patient demographics, operative details, clinical outcomes, and complications were reviewed. RESULTS The patient cohort consisted of 41 female and 54 male patients whose average age was 62 years. Half of the patients had single-level, one-third had 2-level, and the remaining patients had 3- or 4-level procedures. The surgical time for endoscopic technique was significantly longer per level compared to MIS (161.8 +/- 6.8 minutes vs 99.3 +/- 4.6 minutes; p < 0.001). Hospital stay for MIS patients was on average 2.4 +/- 0.5 days compared to 0.7 +/- 0.1 days for endoscopic patients (p = 0.001). At the 1-year follow-up, endoscopic patients had a significantly lower visual analog scale score for leg pain than MIS patients (1.3 +/- 0.3 vs 3.0 +/- 0.5; p < 0.01). Moreover, the back pain disability index score was significantly lower in the endoscopic cohort than in the MIS cohort (20.7 +/- 3.4 vs 35.9 +/- 4.1; p < 0.01). Two patients in the MIS group (epidural hematoma) and one patient in the endoscopic group (disc herniation) required a return to the operating room acutely after surgery (< 14 days). CONCLUSIONS Lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression is a safe and effective surgical procedure with favorable complication profile and patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 499
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy
    Mobbs, Ralph Jasper
    Li, Jane
    Sivabalan, Praveenan
    Raley, Darryl
    Rao, Prashanth J.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2014, 21 (02) : 179 - 186
  • [32] Clinical Outcomes of Uniportal and Biportal Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Pair-Matched Case-Control Study
    Hua, Wenbin
    Liao, Zhiwei
    Chen, Chao
    Feng, Xiaobo
    Ke, Wencan
    Wang, Bingjin
    Li, Shuai
    Wang, Kun
    Zeng, Xianlin
    Wu, Xinghuo
    Zhang, Yukun
    Yang, Cao
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 161 : E134 - E145
  • [33] Comparison of the short-term effects of lumbar endoscopic and microscopic tubular unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression in the treatment of elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis
    Jianing Zhang
    Dingjie Liang
    Mengmeng Xu
    Kun Yan
    Dapeng Zhang
    Weiqing Qian
    European Journal of Medical Research, 27
  • [34] Comparison of the short-term effects of lumbar endoscopic and microscopic tubular unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression in the treatment of elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis
    Zhang, Jianing
    Liang, Dingjie
    Xu, Mengmeng
    Yan, Kun
    Zhang, Dapeng
    Qian, Weiqing
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 27 (01)
  • [35] Clinical efficacy of unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression in the treatment of adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion
    Xu, Yun
    Liu, Yang
    Ding, Ding
    Ru, Bin
    Wan, Quan
    Ji, Zhongwei
    Liu, Wenlong
    Guo, Ran
    Hu, Jiaqi
    Zhang, Nannan
    Xu, Langhai
    Li, Shun
    Cai, Wenjun
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2024, 11
  • [36] Unilateral Laminotomy with Bilateral Spinal Canal Decompression for Lumbar Stenosis: A Technical Note
    Moisi, Marc
    Fisahn, Christian
    Tkachenko, Lara
    Tubbs, R. Shane
    Ginat, Daniel
    Grunert, Peter
    Jeyamohan, Shiveindra
    Reintjes, Stephen
    Ajayi, Olaide
    Page, Jeni
    Oskouian, Rod J.
    Hanscom, David
    CUREUS, 2016, 8 (05):
  • [37] Modified Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Technical Note
    Liu, Xinyu
    Yuan, Suomao
    Tian, Yonghao
    SPINE, 2013, 38 (12) : E732 - E737
  • [38] Retrospective Study to Compare the Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Microscopic Unilateral Laminotomy with Microscopic Bilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression in the Early Postoperative Period in 142 Patients with Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Gulensoy, Bulent
    Simsek, Serkan
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2024, 30
  • [39] Clinical study of minimally invasive endoscopic lumbar spinal decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis
    Chu, Haikun
    Pang, Bin
    Qin, Xiangzheng
    Liu, Yanqun
    BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2019, 125 : 316 - 317
  • [40] Consecutive Case Series of Uniportal Full-endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Relationship between Decompression Range and Functional Outcomes
    Tan, Haining
    Yu, Lingjia
    Xie, Xuehu
    Liu, Ning
    Zhang, Guoqiang
    Li, Xiang
    Yang, Yong
    Zhu, Bin
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2023, 15 (12) : 3153 - 3161