Comparison of clinical outcomes following minimally invasive or lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression

被引:76
|
作者
McGrath, Lynn B., Jr. [1 ]
White-Dzuro, Gabrielle A. [1 ]
Hofstetter, Christoph P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Neurol Surg, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
full-endoscopic spine surgery; stenosis; radiculopathy; minimally invasive spine surgery; MIS; unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression; lumbar; LOW-BACK-PAIN; SPINAL STENOSIS; NONSURGICAL MANAGEMENT; FUSION SURGERY; LAMINECTOMY; INSTABILITY; COMPLICATIONS; DISABILITY; QUALITY; COST;
D O I
10.3171/2018.9.SPINE18689
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE Minimally invasive lumbar unilateral tubular laminotomy for bilateral decompression has gradually gained acceptance as a less destabilizing but efficacious and safe alternative to traditional open decompression techniques. The authors have further advanced the principles of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) by utilizing working-channel endoscope-based techniques. Full-endoscopic technique allows for high-resolution off-axis visualization of neural structures within the lateral recess, thereby minimizing the need for facet joint resection. The relative efficacy and safety of MIS and full-endoscopic techniques have not been directly compared. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 95 consecutive patients undergoing either MIS (n = 45) or endoscopic (n = 50) unilateral laminotomies for bilateral decompression in cases of lumbar spinal stenosis was performed. Patient demographics, operative details, clinical outcomes, and complications were reviewed. RESULTS The patient cohort consisted of 41 female and 54 male patients whose average age was 62 years. Half of the patients had single-level, one-third had 2-level, and the remaining patients had 3- or 4-level procedures. The surgical time for endoscopic technique was significantly longer per level compared to MIS (161.8 +/- 6.8 minutes vs 99.3 +/- 4.6 minutes; p < 0.001). Hospital stay for MIS patients was on average 2.4 +/- 0.5 days compared to 0.7 +/- 0.1 days for endoscopic patients (p = 0.001). At the 1-year follow-up, endoscopic patients had a significantly lower visual analog scale score for leg pain than MIS patients (1.3 +/- 0.3 vs 3.0 +/- 0.5; p < 0.01). Moreover, the back pain disability index score was significantly lower in the endoscopic cohort than in the MIS cohort (20.7 +/- 3.4 vs 35.9 +/- 4.1; p < 0.01). Two patients in the MIS group (epidural hematoma) and one patient in the endoscopic group (disc herniation) required a return to the operating room acutely after surgery (< 14 days). CONCLUSIONS Lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression is a safe and effective surgical procedure with favorable complication profile and patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 499
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Provides Comparable Clinical Outcomes in Patients with and without Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Yoshikane, Koichi
    Kikuchi, Katsuhiko
    Okazaki, Ken
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 150 : E361 - E371
  • [12] Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis:: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy
    Thomé, C
    Zevgaridis, D
    Leheta, O
    Bäzner, H
    Pöckler-Schöniger, C
    Wöhrle, J
    Schmiedek, P
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2005, 3 (02) : 129 - 141
  • [13] Radiological Outcomes of Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With and Without Discectomy
    Cho, Hyun-Seo
    Kim, Se-Hoon
    Han, Jeong Su
    Kim, Bum-Joon
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 175 : E1307 - E1314
  • [14] Clinical Outcomes of Selective Single-Level Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression of Multilevel Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Risk Factors of Reoperation
    Yoshikane, Koichi
    Kikuchi, Katsuhiko
    Okazaki, Ken
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 13 (05) : 1350 - 1357
  • [15] Ten-step minimally invasive slalom unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (sULBD) with navigation
    Adelhoefer, Siegfried J.
    Berger, Jessica
    Mykolajtchuk, Catherine
    Gujral, Jaskeerat
    Boadi, Blake I.
    Fiani, Brian
    Hartl, Roger
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [16] Ten-step minimally invasive slalom unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (sULBD) with navigation
    Siegfried J. Adelhoefer
    Jessica Berger
    Catherine Mykolajtchuk
    Jaskeerat Gujral
    Blake I. Boadi
    Brian Fiani
    Roger Härtl
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 24
  • [17] Inside-Out Approach of Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression: A Detailed Technical Description, Rationale and Outcomes
    Lim, Kang Taek
    Meceda, Elmer Jose Arevalo
    Park, Chun-Kun
    NEUROSPINE, 2020, 17 : S88 - S98
  • [18] Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis part II: Clinical experiences
    U. Spetzger
    H. Bertalanffy
    M. H. T. Reinges
    J. M. Gilsbach
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 1997, 139 : 397 - 403
  • [19] Bilateral synchronous UBE for unilateral laminotomy and bilateral decompression as a potentially effective minimally Invasive approach for two-level lumbar spinal stenosis
    Zhao, Yulin
    Guo, Yingjun
    Pan, Xin
    Li, Hao
    Gao, Xianlei
    Si, Haipeng
    Xu, Wanlong
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [20] Long-Term Outcome after Less Invasive Surgery for Decompression of Lumbar Stenosis - A Randomized Comparison of Unilateral Laminotomy, Bilateral Laminotomy and Laminectomy
    Thome, Claudius
    Schubert, Gerrit A.
    Stier, Reinhard
    Hegewald, Aldemar A.
    Schmiedek, Peter
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2010, 113 (02) : A432 - A433