Start-Up and dynamic processes simulation of supercritical once-through boiler

被引:37
|
作者
Deng, Kangjie [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Chen [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Hao [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Nana [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Shanglong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Lowgrade Energy Utilizat Technol & Syst, Chongqing 400030, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ, Coll Power Engn, 174 Shazhengjie, Chongqing 400030, Peoples R China
关键词
Supercritical; Boiler; Cold start-up; Dynamic; Fuel consumption; POWER-PLANT; COAL; VALIDATION; SYSTEM; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.01.016
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The rapid expansion of the electricity demand causes the gap between the peak load and valley load increasing in China. Since the coal-fired supercritical power plant needs to be started up frequently, the operations of power plant become more flexible. During the start-up process, the operation parameters are off-designed, the multi-transient phenomenon is inevitable and the intensive emission always appears during varying working condition, it is difficult to ensure the operator of the real power plant to start up the boiler following the design curve. In this work, a new dynamic model for simulating start-up dynamic process of a 600 MW supercritical boiler is introduced in this paper. The six-equation solution of two-phase flow was applied to modeling the evaporator, and the process from ignition to the load at 30% Boiler Maximum Continuous Rating (BMCR) was simulated. The results demonstrate that the model is reasonable and dynamic behavior can be observed clearly. Also, these prove that the control strategy is advisable. Moreover, the fuel consumption of the start-up process can offer a reference to operator of the real power plant. The validated model is of high relevance for further optimizing the boiler start-up process. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:937 / 946
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Study of flue-gas temperature difference in supercritical once-through boiler
    Kang, Yanchang
    Li, Bing
    Song, Ang
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (EEEP2017), 2018, 121
  • [42] INVESTIGATION OF STEAM-WATER CORROSION OF STEEL OF A ONCE-THROUGH SUPERCRITICAL BOILER
    STORONSKII, VI
    AVDEEVA, AA
    THERMAL ENGINEERING, 1977, 24 (08) : 47 - 48
  • [43] Mathematical Modeling And Dynamic Simulation of Intermediate Point Temperature for Ultrasupercritical Once-through Boiler II
    Fang, Yanjun
    Wang, Zhenyu
    6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT COMPUTING AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, AND THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCED INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2012, : 922 - 927
  • [44] Sensitivity analysis of 600MW supercritical pressure once-through boiler
    Huang, JT
    Chen, TK
    MULTIPHASE FLOW AND HEAT TRANSFER, 1999, : 403 - 409
  • [45] Mathematical model of real-time simulation for a 500 MW supercritical-pressure once-through boiler
    Xu, Er-shu
    Li, Shu-kang
    Ma, Gang
    Reneng Dongli Gongcheng/Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power, 2000, 15 (04): : 405 - 407
  • [46] A dynamic mathematical model of an ultra-supercritical coal fired once-through boiler-turbine unit
    Fan, He
    Zhang, Yu-fei
    Su, Zhi-gang
    Wang, Ben
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 189 : 654 - 666
  • [47] Comparative investigation of drum-type and once-through heat recovery steam generator during start-up
    Mertens, Nicolas
    Alobaid, Falah
    Starkloff, Ralf
    Epple, Bernd
    Kim, Hyun-Gee
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 144 : 250 - 260
  • [48] Positive Flow Response Characteristic in Vertical Tube Furnace of Supercritical Once-Through Boiler
    Wang, Huan
    Che, Defu
    JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS, 2014, 6 (03)
  • [49] AUTOMATIC CONTROLS EXCEL IN START-UPS ON GENERATING UNIT WITH ONCE-THROUGH BOILER
    HAYES, RH
    CRAWFORD, W
    POWER ENGINEERING, 1975, 79 (06) : 49 - 53
  • [50] Supercritical Once-through Boiler Water-coal Ratio Modelling and Character Study
    Liu, Tao
    Liu, Jizhen
    Zhang, Heng
    Lv, You
    2015 27TH CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE (CCDC), 2015, : 25 - 30