Evaluation of enamel loss by scanning electron microscopy after debonding brackets place with four different adhesives

被引:3
|
作者
Rodriguez-Chavez, Jacqueline Adelina [1 ]
Arenas-Alatorre, Jesus Angel [2 ]
Flores-Ruiz, Hugo M. [3 ]
Flores-Ledesma, Abigailt [4 ]
Aguilar-Perez, Fernando Javier [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guadalajara, Dept Clin Odontol Integrales, Ctr Univ Ciencias Salud, Salvador Quevedo & Zubieta 228,Edificio B, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico
[2] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Dept Mat Condensada, Inst Fis, Circuito Invest Cient S-N,Ciudad Univ, Mexico City 04510, DF, Mexico
[3] Univ Guadalajara, Dept Ciencias Nat & Exactas, CUValles Campus, Ameca 46600, Jalisco, Mexico
[4] Benemerita Univ Autonoma Puebla, Fac Estomatol, 31 Poniente 1304, Puebla 72410, Mexico
[5] Univ Autonoma Yucatan, Fac Odontol, Campus Ciencias Salud,Calle 61-A 492-A, Merida 97000, Yucatan, Mexico
关键词
adhesion; scanning electron microscope; shear bonding strength; tooth enamel loss; SHEAR BOND STRENGTH; SELF-ETCHING PRIMER; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; CERAMIC BRACKETS; REMOVAL; COMPOSITE;
D O I
10.1002/jemt.23652
中图分类号
R602 [外科病理学、解剖学]; R32 [人体形态学];
学科分类号
100101 ;
摘要
The clinically adequate shear bond strengths (SBS) should be from 2.8 to 10 MPa. The aim of this research is to observe tooth enamel loss through a scanning electron microscope (SEM) during the debonding of braces of four adhesive systems. Then, 100 premolars were used in 4 groups of 25 specimens each, for Transbond MIP (G1), Enlight (G2), Stylus (G3), and Transbond Plus SEP (G4). The research was done under the NOM ISO/TS 11405:2015. Gemini 3M were placed under the manufacturer's recommendations. The SBS test was done at 24 hr in an Instron electromechanical universal testing machine at 1 mm/1 min. Adhesive remnant index (ARI) was measured, all of the brackets where examined in the SEM. For the shear bonding strength G1 = 10.09 +/- 2.73 MPa, G2 = 9.27 +/- 3.99 MPa, G3 = 7.83 +/- 4.46 MPa, and G4 = 6.40 +/- 2.85 MPa statistically significant differences were found when comparing the four groups (p = .002). In the Tukey post hoc test, G1 versus G4 and G2 versus G4, statistically significant differences were found. For the ARI a value of 1 in 46%, followed by a value of 2 in 38%, a value of 3 in 13% and a value of 0 in 3% of the total samples, finding statistically significant differences (p < .001). In relation to the tooth enamel loss due to SBS, statistically significant differences were found (p = .326). G1 and G4 had not statistically significant differences. Even though our results concur with the appropriate clinical values, we observed tooth enamel loss with Transbond Plus SEP and Stylus.
引用
收藏
页码:912 / 920
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A scanning electron microscopy comparison of enamel polishing methods after air-rotor stripping
    Piacentini, C
    Sfondrini, G
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1996, 109 (01) : 57 - 63
  • [32] The Influence of Various Adhesive Systems and Polishing Methods on Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets: A Three-Dimensional In Vitro Evaluation
    Krivkova, Tereza
    Tichy, Antonin
    Tycova, Hana
    Kucera, Josef
    MATERIALS, 2023, 16 (14)
  • [33] Influence of different power outputs and times on shear bond strength and scanning electron microscopy evaluation of bonded brackets using ER,CR:YSGG laser
    Bagwan, Ahmed Abdo
    Abuaffan, Amal Hussein
    CLINICAL AND INVESTIGATIVE ORTHODONTICS, 2022, 81 (02): : 77 - 83
  • [34] Evaluation of enamel by scanning electron microscopy green led associated to hydrogen peroxide 35% for dental bleaching
    Monteiro, Juliana S. C.
    de Oliveira, Susana C. P. S.
    Zanin, Fatima A. A.
    Santos, Gustavo M. P.
    Sampaio, Fernando J. P.
    Gomes Junior, Rafael Araujo
    Gesteira, Maria F. M.
    Vannier-Santos, Marcos A.
    Pinheiro, Antonio L. B.
    MECHANISMS FOR LOW-LIGHT THERAPY IX, 2014, 8932
  • [35] A Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of Three Remineralizing Agents on Bleached Enamel: A Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Analysis
    Singh, Neha
    Ranjan, Dipshi
    Mahreen, Shazia
    Pattanaik, Ankita
    Kaur, Gurinder
    Nagpal, Ajay
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (04)
  • [36] Evaluation of Human Corneal Lenticule Quality After SMILE With Different Cap Thicknesses Using Scanning Electron Microscopy
    Weng, Shengbei
    Liu, Manli
    Yang, Xiaonan
    Liu, Fang
    Zhou, Yugui
    Lin, Haiqin
    Liu, Quan
    CORNEA, 2018, 37 (01) : 59 - 65
  • [37] Evaluation of Enamel Roughness in Vitro After Orthodontic Bracket Debonding Using Different Methods of Residual Adhesive Removal
    Lima Ferreira, Jose Tarcisio
    Borsatto, Maria Cristina
    Pereira Saraiva, Maria Conceicao
    Nakane Matsumoto, Mirian Aiko
    Torres, Carolina Paes
    Romano, Fabio Lourenco
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2020, 33 (01) : 43 - 51
  • [38] Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of composite inlays luted with different adhesive systems
    Popovici, A.
    Trif, M.
    Moldovan, M.
    Fodor, O.
    Nicola, C.
    Borzea, D.
    OPTOELECTRONICS AND ADVANCED MATERIALS-RAPID COMMUNICATIONS, 2009, 3 (06): : 616 - 620
  • [39] SCANNING ELECTRON-MICROSCOPY OF DIFFERENT MATERIALS AFTER URINE CONTACT INVITRO
    WEISSBACH, L
    LUNOW, R
    GEBHARDT, M
    BASTIAN, HP
    UROLOGE-AUSGABE A, 1979, 18 (03): : 175 - 179
  • [40] Using scanning electron microscopy for quality evaluation of apples after cold storage
    Ribeiro, CJO
    Bandeira-Tavares, P
    Rosa, EAS
    Meireles, O
    Silva, A
    Proceedings of the 5th International Postharvest Symposium, Vols 1-3, 2005, (682): : 715 - 721