Evaluation of enamel loss by scanning electron microscopy after debonding brackets place with four different adhesives

被引:3
|
作者
Rodriguez-Chavez, Jacqueline Adelina [1 ]
Arenas-Alatorre, Jesus Angel [2 ]
Flores-Ruiz, Hugo M. [3 ]
Flores-Ledesma, Abigailt [4 ]
Aguilar-Perez, Fernando Javier [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guadalajara, Dept Clin Odontol Integrales, Ctr Univ Ciencias Salud, Salvador Quevedo & Zubieta 228,Edificio B, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico
[2] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Dept Mat Condensada, Inst Fis, Circuito Invest Cient S-N,Ciudad Univ, Mexico City 04510, DF, Mexico
[3] Univ Guadalajara, Dept Ciencias Nat & Exactas, CUValles Campus, Ameca 46600, Jalisco, Mexico
[4] Benemerita Univ Autonoma Puebla, Fac Estomatol, 31 Poniente 1304, Puebla 72410, Mexico
[5] Univ Autonoma Yucatan, Fac Odontol, Campus Ciencias Salud,Calle 61-A 492-A, Merida 97000, Yucatan, Mexico
关键词
adhesion; scanning electron microscope; shear bonding strength; tooth enamel loss; SHEAR BOND STRENGTH; SELF-ETCHING PRIMER; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; CERAMIC BRACKETS; REMOVAL; COMPOSITE;
D O I
10.1002/jemt.23652
中图分类号
R602 [外科病理学、解剖学]; R32 [人体形态学];
学科分类号
100101 ;
摘要
The clinically adequate shear bond strengths (SBS) should be from 2.8 to 10 MPa. The aim of this research is to observe tooth enamel loss through a scanning electron microscope (SEM) during the debonding of braces of four adhesive systems. Then, 100 premolars were used in 4 groups of 25 specimens each, for Transbond MIP (G1), Enlight (G2), Stylus (G3), and Transbond Plus SEP (G4). The research was done under the NOM ISO/TS 11405:2015. Gemini 3M were placed under the manufacturer's recommendations. The SBS test was done at 24 hr in an Instron electromechanical universal testing machine at 1 mm/1 min. Adhesive remnant index (ARI) was measured, all of the brackets where examined in the SEM. For the shear bonding strength G1 = 10.09 +/- 2.73 MPa, G2 = 9.27 +/- 3.99 MPa, G3 = 7.83 +/- 4.46 MPa, and G4 = 6.40 +/- 2.85 MPa statistically significant differences were found when comparing the four groups (p = .002). In the Tukey post hoc test, G1 versus G4 and G2 versus G4, statistically significant differences were found. For the ARI a value of 1 in 46%, followed by a value of 2 in 38%, a value of 3 in 13% and a value of 0 in 3% of the total samples, finding statistically significant differences (p < .001). In relation to the tooth enamel loss due to SBS, statistically significant differences were found (p = .326). G1 and G4 had not statistically significant differences. Even though our results concur with the appropriate clinical values, we observed tooth enamel loss with Transbond Plus SEP and Stylus.
引用
收藏
页码:912 / 920
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Loss of surface enamel after bracket debonding: An in-vivo and ex-vivo evaluation
    Pont, Huib Berghauser
    Oezcan, Mutlu
    Bagis, Bora
    Ren, Yijin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2010, 138 (04) : 387 - 389
  • [22] Calcium Hydroxide Removal Using Four Different Irrigation Systems: A Quantitative Evaluation by Scanning Electron Microscopy
    Generali, Luigi
    Cavani, Francesco
    Franceschetti, Federico
    Sassatelli, Paolo
    Giardino, Luciano
    Pirani, Chiara
    Iacono, Francesco
    Bertoldi, Carlo
    Angerame, Daniele
    Checchi, Vittorio
    Pedulla, Eugenio
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [23] EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT DEMINERALIZING AGENTS ON HUMAN ENAMEL SURFACES STUDIED BY SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY
    POOLE, DFG
    JOHNSON, NW
    ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 1967, 12 (12) : 1621 - +
  • [24] Failure of Fiber Posts after Cementation with Different Adhesives with or without Silanization Investigated by Pullout Tests and Scanning Electron Microscopy
    Tian, Yu
    Mu, Yunjing
    Setzer, Frank C.
    Lu, Hong
    Qu, Tiejun
    Yu, Qing
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2012, 38 (09) : 1279 - 1282
  • [25] Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of the bonding mechanism of a self-etching primer on enamel
    Cal-Neto, JP
    Miguel, JAM
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2006, 76 (01) : 132 - 136
  • [26] Evaluation of enamel surface integrity after orthodontic bracket debonding: comparison of three different system
    Ghaleb, Labib
    Al-Worafi, Naseem Ali
    Thawaba, Ahmed
    Abdulqader, Abbas Ahmed
    Alkamel, Aqlan
    Abdo, Yaser
    Yang, Zhao
    Noman, Nashwan
    Al-Aroomi, Maged Ali
    Yulou, Tian
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [27] Evaluation of enamel surface integrity after orthodontic bracket debonding: comparison of three different system
    Labib Ghaleb
    Naseem Ali Al-Worafi
    Ahmed Thawaba
    Abbas Ahmed Abdulqader
    Aqlan Alkamel
    Yaser Abdo
    Zhao Yang
    Nashwan Noman
    Maged Ali Al-Aroomi
    Tian Yulou
    BMC Oral Health, 24
  • [28] The Effect of Different Chemical Agents on Human Enamel: An Atomic Force and Scanning Electron Microscopy Study
    Rominu, Roxana Otilia
    Rominu, Mihai
    Negrutiu, Meda Lavinia
    Sinescu, Cosmin
    Pop, Daniela
    Petrescu, Emanuela
    OPTICAL SENSORS AND BIOPHOTONICS II, 2011, 7990
  • [29] Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of enamel surfaces using different air-polishing powders in the orthodontic setting: an in vitro study
    Ratzka, Philipp
    Zaslansky, Paul
    Jost-Brinkmann, Paul-Georg
    JOURNAL OF OROFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS-FORTSCHRITTE DER KIEFERORTHOPADIE, 2024, 85 (06): : 404 - 413
  • [30] Evaluation of Different Adhesive Resin Removal Methods after Debonding Ceramic Orthodontic Molar Tubes: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study
    Atmaca, Zeynep
    Ulusoy, Mutahhar
    Ulusoy, Cagri
    SCANNING, 2022, 2022