The influence of the dose assessment method on the LET dependence of the relative luminescence efficiency of LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P

被引:19
|
作者
Parisi, Alessio [1 ,2 ]
Van Hoey, Olivier [1 ]
Megret, Patrice [2 ]
Vanhavere, Filip [1 ]
机构
[1] CEN, Belgian Nucl Res Ctr SCK, Boeretang 200, Mol, Belgium
[2] Univ Mons, Fac Engn, Blvd Dolez 31, Mons, Belgium
关键词
LiF:Mg; Ti; Cu; P; TLD; Efficiency; LET; TEMPERATURE RATIO HTR; IONIZATION DENSITY; GLOW-CURVE; THERMOLUMINESCENT EFFICIENCY; COSMIC-RADIATION; LIF DETECTORS; ENERGY IONS; LIF-MG; TI; TL;
D O I
10.1016/j.radmeas.2017.02.001
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
Thermoluminescent detectors (TLDs) are solid state detectors commonly used for dose monitoring and dose mapping in many earth and space applications. Among all the crystals available, the ones based on lithium fluoride (LiF) are the most widely spread and studied around the world. In the last years the use of these TLDs in complex heavy charged particles (HCPs) fields, as in spacecraft or in radiotherapy beams, has grown rapidly leading to the necessity of an accurate characterization of the detectors' response in these radiation environments. In this work, (LiF)-Li-6:Mg,Ti, (LiF)-Li-7:Mg,Ti, (LiF)-Li-6:Mg,Cu,P and (LiF)-Li-7:Mg,Cu,P detectors were exposed to different radiation qualities in order to investigate the dependence of their relative luminescence efficiency on the linear energy transfer (LET) of the incident particles. The measured efficiencies were in good agreement with literature. In relation to this issue, different dose assessment methods, i.e. peak height, signal integration over different regions of interest (ROIs) and glow curve deconvolution, were compared and their influence on the measured relative luminescence efficiency values was assessed. For both LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P detectors, no relevant differences were found in the relative luminescence efficiency evaluated by means of main peak height, main peak ROI and main peak deconvolution. On the other hand, if the integration of the signal is extended to the high temperature zone (248-310 degrees C) of LiF:Mg,Ti or the low temperature zone (125-185 degrees C) of LiF:Mg,Cu,P, significant deviations were found. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 40
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effects of ionisation density on the thermoluminescence response (efficiency) of LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P
    Horowitz, Y
    Olko, P
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2004, 109 (04) : 331 - 348
  • [2] Lithium fluoride:: From LiF:Mg,Ti to LiF:Mg,Cu,P
    Bilski, P
    SOLID STATE DOSIMETRY, PTS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 199 - 206
  • [3] Lithium fluoride:: From LiF:Mg,Ti to LiF:Mg,Cu,P
    Bilski, P
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2002, 100 (1-4) : 199 - 206
  • [5] Dose linearity of LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P in radiotherapy:: Effect of time between dose and evaluation
    Duggan, L
    Kron, T
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 1999, 85 (1-4) : 397 - 400
  • [6] Role of dopants in LiF:Mg,Cu, LiF:Mg,P and LiF:Mg,Cu,P detectors
    Mohammadi, Kh
    Zarandi, A. Moussavi
    Afarideh, H.
    Shahmaleki, S.
    JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE CHEMISTRY, 2013, 202 : 282 - 290
  • [7] On LiF:Mg,Cu,P and LiF:Mg,Ti phosphors high & ultra-high dose features
    Obryk, Barbara
    Khoury, Helen J.
    de Barros, Vinicius S.
    Guzzo, Pedro L.
    Bilski, Pawel
    RADIATION MEASUREMENTS, 2014, 71 : 25 - 30
  • [8] Thermoluminescent materials for medical applications:: LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P
    Moscovitch, M.
    Horowitz, Y. S.
    RADIATION MEASUREMENTS, 2006, 41 : S71 - S77
  • [9] Evaluation of the relative thermoluminescence efficiency of LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P TL detectors to low-energy heavy ions
    Gieszczyk, W.
    Bilski, P.
    Olko, P.
    Herrmann, R.
    Kettunen, H.
    Virtanen, A.
    Bassler, N.
    RADIATION MEASUREMENTS, 2013, 51-52 : 7 - 12
  • [10] Whole-body dose and energy measurements in radiotherapy by a combination of LiF:Mg,Cu,P and LiF:Mg,Ti
    Hauri, Pascal
    Schneider, Uwe
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MEDIZINISCHE PHYSIK, 2018, 28 (02): : 96 - 109