Revision arthroplasty of the hip - Modularity of neck and metaphyseal components

被引:0
|
作者
Koester, G. [1 ]
Walde, T. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Orthopad Chirurg & Traumatol Chirurg Orthopad Fac, D-64653 Lorsch, Germany
[2] Univ Klin Gottingen, Abt Unfallchirurg Plast & Wiederherstellungschiru, Gottingen, Germany
来源
ORTHOPADE | 2009年 / 38卷 / 03期
关键词
Hip; Revision arthroplasty; Cementless fixation; Modular stem design; Interchangeable neck; FEMORAL COMPONENT; FOLLOW-UP; STEM; REPLACEMENT; PROSTHESIS; FIXATION; EXPERIENCE; CEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00132-008-1346-x
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Modular parts in femoral components used for hip arthroplasty are reported to be predilection sites for mechanical failure. The possible benefit of their use is therefore controversial. We report the outcome of 97 revision hip arthroplasties using a non-cemented femoral component with a modular metaphyseal part and an interchangeable neck (ProfemurA (R)). The femoral defects treated included Paprosky types I-III. The average follow-up was 5 years (range 3-10 years). No mechanical failure of the modular parts and taper connections has been observed so far. The percentage of patients with a balanced leg length increased from 32% preoperative to 65% postoperative. The mean leg length discrepancy could be reduced from 1.4 cm preoperative to 0.5 cm postoperative. A total of 5 re-revisions were required, including 2 cases of infection. The cumulative survival of the implants due to aseptic loosening was 96.5%. Because of the achieved results the use of the modular stem investigated in this study can be classified as safe and effective for revision hip arthroplasty. The interchangeable neck proved to be a useful completion of the revision system.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / +
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Revision total hip arthroplasty
    Sporer, SM
    Paprosky, WG
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2003, (417) : 203 - 209
  • [42] HIP-ARTHROPLASTY REVISION
    HERBERTS, P
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1992, 63 (02): : 109 - 110
  • [43] THE IMPACT OF MODULARITY IN TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY
    CHMELL, MJ
    RISPLER, D
    POSS, R
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1995, (319) : 77 - 84
  • [44] CONCERNS WITH MODULARITY IN TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY
    BOBYN, JD
    TANZER, M
    KRYGIER, JJ
    DUJOVNE, AR
    BROOKS, CE
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1994, (298) : 27 - 36
  • [45] The rationale and performance of modularity in total hip arthroplasty
    Heim, CS
    Greenwald, AS
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2005, 28 (09) : S1113 - S1115
  • [46] Modularity of the Femoral Component in Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Srinivasan, Anand
    Jung, Edward
    Levine, Brett Russell
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2012, 20 (04) : 214 - 222
  • [47] The role of modularity in primary total hip arthroplasty
    Cameron, Hugh U.
    Keppler, Louis
    McTighe, Tim
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2006, 21 (04): : 89 - 92
  • [48] Subsidence Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Modular and Monolithic Components
    Clair, Andrew J.
    Gabor, Jonathan A.
    Patel, Karan S.
    Friedlander, Scott
    Deshmukh, Ajit J.
    Schwarzkopf, Ran
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (06): : S299 - S303
  • [49] Outcomes of Modular Dual Mobility Acetabular Components in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Sutter, E. Grant
    McClellan, Taylor R.
    Attarian, David E.
    Bolognesi, Michael P.
    Lachiewicz, Paul F.
    Wellman, Samuel S.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (09): : S220 - S224
  • [50] Bilobed oblong porous coated acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty
    Berry, DJ
    Sutherland, CJ
    Trousdale, RT
    Colwell, CW
    Chandler, HP
    Ayres, D
    Yashar, AA
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2000, (371) : 154 - 160