Revision arthroplasty of the hip - Modularity of neck and metaphyseal components

被引:0
|
作者
Koester, G. [1 ]
Walde, T. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Orthopad Chirurg & Traumatol Chirurg Orthopad Fac, D-64653 Lorsch, Germany
[2] Univ Klin Gottingen, Abt Unfallchirurg Plast & Wiederherstellungschiru, Gottingen, Germany
来源
ORTHOPADE | 2009年 / 38卷 / 03期
关键词
Hip; Revision arthroplasty; Cementless fixation; Modular stem design; Interchangeable neck; FEMORAL COMPONENT; FOLLOW-UP; STEM; REPLACEMENT; PROSTHESIS; FIXATION; EXPERIENCE; CEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00132-008-1346-x
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Modular parts in femoral components used for hip arthroplasty are reported to be predilection sites for mechanical failure. The possible benefit of their use is therefore controversial. We report the outcome of 97 revision hip arthroplasties using a non-cemented femoral component with a modular metaphyseal part and an interchangeable neck (ProfemurA (R)). The femoral defects treated included Paprosky types I-III. The average follow-up was 5 years (range 3-10 years). No mechanical failure of the modular parts and taper connections has been observed so far. The percentage of patients with a balanced leg length increased from 32% preoperative to 65% postoperative. The mean leg length discrepancy could be reduced from 1.4 cm preoperative to 0.5 cm postoperative. A total of 5 re-revisions were required, including 2 cases of infection. The cumulative survival of the implants due to aseptic loosening was 96.5%. Because of the achieved results the use of the modular stem investigated in this study can be classified as safe and effective for revision hip arthroplasty. The interchangeable neck proved to be a useful completion of the revision system.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / +
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Current Trends in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: Indications and Types of Components Revised
    Hinton, Zoe W.
    Wu, Christine J.
    Ryan, Sean P.
    Cunningham, Daniel J.
    Green, Cynthia L.
    Lachiewicz, Paul F.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 37 (07): : S611 - +
  • [32] Fixation, Survival, and Dislocation of Jumbo Acetabular Components in Revision Hip Arthroplasty
    Lachiewicz, Paul E.
    Soileau, Elizabeth S.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2013, 95A (06): : 543 - 548
  • [33] Reconstruction of Proximal Metaphyseal Femoral Defects Using Trabecular Metal Augments in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Simon, Sebastian
    Frank, Bernhard J. H.
    Aichmair, Alexander
    Dominkus, Martin
    Hofstaetter, Jochen G.
    ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2021, 8 : 216 - 221
  • [34] Metaphyseal Sleeve Failure in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Bouras, Theodoros
    Fennema, Peter
    Morgan-Jones, Rhidian
    Agarwal, Sanjeev
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (09)
  • [35] The use of metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty
    Dalury, David F.
    Barrett, William P.
    KNEE, 2016, 23 (03): : 545 - 548
  • [36] Survivorship of Metaphyseal Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Chalmers, Brian P.
    Desy, Nicholas M.
    Pagnano, Mark W.
    Trousdale, Robert T.
    Taunton, Michael J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (05): : 1565 - 1570
  • [37] Outcome of a modular head-neck adapter system in revision hip arthroplasty
    Hoberg, Maik
    Konrads, Christian
    Huber, Simon
    Reppenhagen, Stephan
    Walcher, Matthias
    Steinert, Andre
    Barthel, Thomas
    Rudert, Maximilian
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2015, 135 (10) : 1469 - 1474
  • [38] Pitfalls in revision hip arthroplasty
    Perka, Carsten
    Ascherl, Rudolf
    ORTHOPADIE, 2023, 52 (01): : 35 - 47
  • [39] Revision hip arthroplasty in nonagenarians
    Starks, Ian
    Gregory, Jonathan
    Phillips, Stephen
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2010, 76 (06): : 766 - 770
  • [40] Revision total hip arthroplasty
    Lakstein, D.
    MINERVA ORTOPEDICA E TRAUMATOLOGICA, 2010, 61 (01) : 51 - 65