Revision arthroplasty of the hip - Modularity of neck and metaphyseal components

被引:0
|
作者
Koester, G. [1 ]
Walde, T. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Orthopad Chirurg & Traumatol Chirurg Orthopad Fac, D-64653 Lorsch, Germany
[2] Univ Klin Gottingen, Abt Unfallchirurg Plast & Wiederherstellungschiru, Gottingen, Germany
来源
ORTHOPADE | 2009年 / 38卷 / 03期
关键词
Hip; Revision arthroplasty; Cementless fixation; Modular stem design; Interchangeable neck; FEMORAL COMPONENT; FOLLOW-UP; STEM; REPLACEMENT; PROSTHESIS; FIXATION; EXPERIENCE; CEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00132-008-1346-x
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Modular parts in femoral components used for hip arthroplasty are reported to be predilection sites for mechanical failure. The possible benefit of their use is therefore controversial. We report the outcome of 97 revision hip arthroplasties using a non-cemented femoral component with a modular metaphyseal part and an interchangeable neck (ProfemurA (R)). The femoral defects treated included Paprosky types I-III. The average follow-up was 5 years (range 3-10 years). No mechanical failure of the modular parts and taper connections has been observed so far. The percentage of patients with a balanced leg length increased from 32% preoperative to 65% postoperative. The mean leg length discrepancy could be reduced from 1.4 cm preoperative to 0.5 cm postoperative. A total of 5 re-revisions were required, including 2 cases of infection. The cumulative survival of the implants due to aseptic loosening was 96.5%. Because of the achieved results the use of the modular stem investigated in this study can be classified as safe and effective for revision hip arthroplasty. The interchangeable neck proved to be a useful completion of the revision system.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / +
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Re-revision of failed revision Total Hip Arthroplasty acetabular components
    Lim, Seung-Jae
    Lee, Young-Suk
    Lim, Byung-Ho
    Park, Youn-Soo
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2014, 80 (03): : 357 - 364
  • [12] Reconstruction of tibial metaphyseal defects with artificial components in revision arthroplasty (GenuX MK System)
    Kohlhof, H.
    Randau, T.
    Kehrer, M.
    Wirtz, D. C.
    OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2020, 32 (04): : 284 - 297
  • [13] How Have Alternative Bearings and Modularity Affected Revision Rates in Total Hip Arthroplasty?
    Mihalko, William M.
    Wimmer, Markus A.
    Pacione, Carol A.
    Laurent, Michel P.
    Murphy, Robert F.
    Rider, Carson
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 472 (12) : 3747 - 3758
  • [14] Constrained acetabular components in complex revision total hip arthroplasty
    McCarthy, JC
    Lee, J
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2005, (441) : 210 - 215
  • [15] Metaphyseal Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Chen, Antonia F.
    Pagnotto, Michael R.
    Crossett, Lawrence S.
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2012, 22 (04) : 203 - 208
  • [16] Metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty
    Ponzio D.Y.
    Austin M.S.
    Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2015, 8 (4) : 361 - 367
  • [17] Metaphyseal Fixation for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Couch, Cory G.
    Ryan, Sean P.
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2021, 31 (04)
  • [18] Revision hip arthroplasty
    Spencer, R. F.
    MINERVA ORTOPEDICA E TRAUMATOLOGICA, 2012, 63 (03) : 141 - 146
  • [19] Modularity in primary total hip arthroplasty
    Cameron, HU
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1996, 11 (03): : 332 - 334
  • [20] Modular neck and ceramic on ceramic coupling in revision total hip arthroplasty
    Pignatti, G.
    Stagni, C.
    Dallari, D.
    Bochicchio, V.
    Raimondi, A.
    Giunti, A.
    BIOCERAMICS AND ALTERNATIVE BEARINGS IN JOINT ARTHROPLASTY, 2006, : 145 - +