Revision arthroplasty of the hip - Modularity of neck and metaphyseal components

被引:0
|
作者
Koester, G. [1 ]
Walde, T. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Orthopad Chirurg & Traumatol Chirurg Orthopad Fac, D-64653 Lorsch, Germany
[2] Univ Klin Gottingen, Abt Unfallchirurg Plast & Wiederherstellungschiru, Gottingen, Germany
来源
ORTHOPADE | 2009年 / 38卷 / 03期
关键词
Hip; Revision arthroplasty; Cementless fixation; Modular stem design; Interchangeable neck; FEMORAL COMPONENT; FOLLOW-UP; STEM; REPLACEMENT; PROSTHESIS; FIXATION; EXPERIENCE; CEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00132-008-1346-x
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Modular parts in femoral components used for hip arthroplasty are reported to be predilection sites for mechanical failure. The possible benefit of their use is therefore controversial. We report the outcome of 97 revision hip arthroplasties using a non-cemented femoral component with a modular metaphyseal part and an interchangeable neck (ProfemurA (R)). The femoral defects treated included Paprosky types I-III. The average follow-up was 5 years (range 3-10 years). No mechanical failure of the modular parts and taper connections has been observed so far. The percentage of patients with a balanced leg length increased from 32% preoperative to 65% postoperative. The mean leg length discrepancy could be reduced from 1.4 cm preoperative to 0.5 cm postoperative. A total of 5 re-revisions were required, including 2 cases of infection. The cumulative survival of the implants due to aseptic loosening was 96.5%. Because of the achieved results the use of the modular stem investigated in this study can be classified as safe and effective for revision hip arthroplasty. The interchangeable neck proved to be a useful completion of the revision system.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / +
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Revision arthroplasty of the hip: Modularity of neck and metaphyseal components [Revisionsendoprothetik der hüfte: Modularität von hals- und metaphysenkomponente]
    Köster G.
    Walde T.A.
    Der Orthopäde, 2009, 38 (3): : 238 - 247
  • [2] Pseudotumor recurrence in a post-revision total hip arthroplasty with stem neck modularity: A case report
    Desai, Bhumit R.
    Sumarriva, Gonzalo E.
    Chimento, George F.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDICS, 2020, 11 (02): : 116 - 122
  • [3] Stem modularity is unnecessary in revision total hip arthroplasty - In the affirmative
    Barrack, RL
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2003, 18 (03): : 98 - 100
  • [4] Stem modularity is unnecessary in revision total hip arthroplasty - In opposition
    Cameron, HU
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2003, 18 (03): : 101 - 103
  • [5] Early Disassembly of Femoral Head and Neck Components After Total Hip Arthroplasty Revision
    Tutuncu, Mehmed Nuri
    Karaismailoglu, Bedri
    Sahin, Erdem
    Karaismailoglu, Turgut Nedim
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (02)
  • [6] Head-neck modularity for total hip arthroplasty - Is it necessary?
    Hozack, WJ
    Mesa, JJ
    Rothman, RF
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1996, 11 (04): : 397 - 399
  • [7] Outcomes of neck modularity in total hip arthroplasty: an Italian perspective
    Papalia R.
    Di Martino A.
    Caldaria A.
    Zampogna B.
    Denaro V.
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY, 2019, 103 (3) : 215 - 220
  • [8] Customized Acetabular Components in Revision hip Arthroplasty
    Kavalersky, G. M.
    Murylev, V. Yu.
    Rukin, Y. A.
    Lychagin, A. V.
    Elizarov, P. M.
    TRAVMATOLOGIYA I ORTOPEDIYA ROSSII, 2016, 22 (04): : 114 - 121
  • [9] REVISION HIP ARTHROPLASTY USING CEMENTLESS FEMORAL COMPONENTS
    Tikhilov, R. M.
    Sementkovskiy, A. V.
    Sivkov, V. S.
    Goncharov, M. Y.
    Malygin, R. V.
    TRAVMATOLOGIYA I ORTOPEDIYA ROSSII, 2011, (02): : 22 - 29
  • [10] Is modularity necessary when using a tapered stem in revision total hip arthroplasty?
    Schwartz, Adam J.
    Spangehl, Mark J.
    Beauchamp, Christopher P.
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE, 2014, 25 (02): : 143 - 146