Comparison of multiplexed sensitivity encoding and single-shot echo-planar imaging for diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver

被引:16
|
作者
Kim, Yeun-Yoon [1 ]
Kim, Myeong-Jin [1 ]
Gho, Sung-Min [2 ]
Seo, Nieun [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Severance Hosp, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[2] GE Healthcare, MR Collaborat & Dev, 416 Hangang Daero, Seoul 04637, South Korea
关键词
Diagnostic techniques and procedures; Magnetic resonance imaging; Comparative study; Artefacts; Signal-to-noise ratio; LESION DETECTION; MRI; EPI; ARTIFACTS; IMAGES; DWI;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109292
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare multiplexed sensitivity encoding (MUSE) and conventional diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (cDWI) techniques in liver MRI. Methods: Fifty-nine patients who underwent both two-shot echo-planar DWI using MUSE and single-shot echoplanar cDWI at a 3.0-T MRI system were included. Qualitative parameters were independently evaluated by three radiologists, and quantitative parameters were calculated on the basis of region of interest measurements. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and McNemar's test were used to compare solid lesion characterization results and lesion detectability, respectively. Results: All reviewers found less image noise, sharper liver contours, milder susceptibility artifacts, and better lesion conspicuity in MUSE-DWI than in cDWI (reader average mean, 4.1-4.5 vs. 3.5-4.0; p < 0.05). The signalto-noise ratio (SNR) of the liver was significantly higher in MUSE-DWI than in cDWI (right lobe: mean, 9.39 vs. 8.10, p < 0.001; left lobe: mean, 8.34 vs. 7.19, p < 0.001), while the SNR of the lesion (mean, 23.72 vs. 23.88, p = 0.911) and lesion-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratio (mean, 14.65 vs. 15.41, p = 0.527) were comparable between MUSE-DWI and cDWI. Solid lesion characterization results were comparably accurate between MUSE-DWI and cDWI (reader average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.985 vs. 0.986, p = 0.480). The detectability of lesions was better in MUSE-DWI than in cDWI (reader consensus, 83.7 % [41/49] vs. 67.3 % [33/49], p = 0.021). Conclusion: MUSE-DWI can provide multi-shot liver DWI with less noise, fewer distortions, improved SNR of the liver, and better lesion detectability.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging in the assessment of orbital tumors: comparison with conventional single-shot echo-planar imaging in image quality and diagnostic performance
    Xu, Xiaoquan
    Wang, Yanjun
    Hu, Hao
    Su, Guoyi
    Liu, Hu
    Shi, Haibin
    Wu, Feiyun
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2017, 58 (12) : 1457 - 1467
  • [22] Characterization of focal hepatic lesions on diffusion-weighted MR imaging: Comparison between single-shot echo-planar imaging and single shot fast spin-echo sequence
    Ohgiya, Y
    Gokan, T
    Nobusawa, H
    Hirose, M
    Seino, N
    Munechika, H
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 108 - 108
  • [23] Diffusion-weighted imaging of the sellar region: A comparison study of BLADE and single-shot echo planar imaging sequences
    Lu Yiping
    Liu Hui
    Zhou Kun
    Geng Daoying
    Yin Bo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 83 (07) : 1239 - 1244
  • [24] Clinical utility of single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging using L1-regularized iterative sensitivity encoding in prostate MRI
    Nishioka, Noriko
    Fujima, Noriyuki
    Tsuneta, Satonori
    Yoneyama, Masami
    Matsumoto, Ryuji
    Abe, Takashige
    Kimura, Rina
    Sakamoto, Keita
    Kato, Fumi
    Kudo, Kohsuke
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (17) : E33639
  • [25] Readout-segmented diffusion weighted imaging of the testis at 3.0 T: comparison with single-shot echo-planar imaging
    Feifei Yao
    Mengyue Huang
    Juan Li
    Xuemei Gao
    Abdominal Radiology, 2023, 48 : 2131 - 2138
  • [26] Readout-segmented diffusion weighted imaging of the testis at 3.0 T: comparison with single-shot echo-planar imaging
    Yao, Feifei
    Huang, Mengyue
    Li, Juan
    Gao, Xuemei
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 48 (06) : 2131 - 2138
  • [27] Comparison of Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging (EPI) and Single-Shot EPI in Clinical Application of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Pediatric Brain
    Yeom, Kristen W.
    Holdsworth, Samantha J.
    Van, Anh T.
    Iv, Michael
    Skare, Stefan
    Lober, Robert M.
    Bammer, Roland
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 200 (05) : W437 - W443
  • [28] Mediastinal Mass: Assessment with Diffusion-weighted Single Shot Echo-planar MR Imaging
    Razek, Abdel A.
    Elshafeay, M.
    Elhadedy, T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 188 (05)
  • [29] Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with single-shot echo-planar imaging in the upper abdomen: preliminary clinical experience in 61 patients
    Ichikawa, T
    Haradome, H
    Hachiya, J
    Nitatori, T
    Araki, T
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 1999, 24 (05): : 456 - 461
  • [30] Comparison of Readout-Segmented and Conventional Single-Shot for Echo-Planar Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Assessment of Kidney Interstitial Fibrosis
    Friedli, Iris
    Crowe, Lindsey Alexandra
    de Perrot, Thomas
    Berchtold, Lena
    Martin, Pierre-Yves
    de Seigneux, Sophie
    Vallee, Jean-Paul
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2017, 46 (06) : 1631 - 1640