Oral versus Topical Diclofenac for Pain Prevention during Panretinal Photocoagulation

被引:22
|
作者
Zakrzewski, Peter A. [2 ]
O'Donnell, Heather L. [2 ]
Lam, Wai-Ching [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Toronto Western Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Ophthalmol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE; ANALOG SCALE PAIN; LASER; RETROBULBAR; PENETRATION; ANESTHESIA; MANAGEMENT; SEVERITY; SODIUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.01.022
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the effect of pretreatment oral and topical diclofenac on pain reduction during panretinal laser photocoagulation (PRP) for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Design: Prospective, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Participants and Controls: A total of 90 patients with PDR requiring PRP for the first time were assigned randomly to 1 of 3 study groups: oral diclofenac (n = 30), topical diclofenac (n = 31), or placebo (n = 29). Methods: Study medications were administrated before the first PRP treatment, and pain levels experienced during and 15 minutes after PRP were recorded on a visual analog scale (VAS). Pain levels during a second PRP session, performed on a later date with no pretreatment medications, also were recorded on a VAS. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measures were the mean VAS pain scores during the first PRP treatment. Secondary outcome measures were the mean VAS pain scores 15 minutes after the first PRP and during the second PRP, and reported side effects after the first PRP. Results: Mean VAS pain scores during the first PRP were: oral diclofenac, 25.7 +/- 19.9; topical diclofenac, 33.8 +/- 27.9; and placebo, 41.3 +/- 31.0. The pain score difference between oral diclofenac and placebo was both clinically significant (>= 13) and statistically significant (P = 0.02), whereas differences between oral and topical diclofenac (P = 0.20) and topical diclofenac and placebo (P = 0.33) were not. Multivariate regression analysis for age, gender, and total laser energy demonstrated lower pain levels for both oral diclofenac (P = 0.015) and topical diclofenac (P<0.0001) versus placebo, but no difference between oral and topical diclofenac (P = 0.67). For the first PRP, all 3 groups had lower mean pain scores at 15 minutes after treatment compared with during treatment (P <= 0.0003). Mean pain scores were higher during the second compared with the first PRP for the oral diclofenac (P = 0.02) and placebo (P = 0.05) groups. No significant rate difference for any side effect was found between groups. Conclusions: When given in a single dose, oral diclofenac is an effective pretreatment analgesic agent for reducing the pain experienced during PRP for PDR. Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article. Ophthalmology 2009;116:1168-1174 (C) 2009 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
引用
收藏
页码:1168 / 1174
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diclofenac for Panretinal Photocoagulation Pain
    Rodrigues, Alexandre de Faria
    Messias, Andre M. V.
    Da Silva, Jose Aparecido
    Ribeiro, Jefferson A. S.
    Jorge, Rodrigo
    Scott, Ingrid U.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 117 (12)
  • [2] Pain relief during panretinal photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy Reply
    Richardson, C.
    Waterman, H.
    EYE, 2010, 24 (08) : 1416 - 1417
  • [3] CENTRAL VERSUS PERIPHERAL PANRETINAL PHOTOCOAGULATION
    GAMEL, JW
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1988, 95 (08) : 1157 - 1157
  • [4] Reduction of Fluence to Decrease Pain During Panretinal Photocoagulation in Diabetic Patients
    Alvarez-Verduzco, Oscar
    Garcia-Aguirre, Gerardo
    de Lourdes Lopez-Ramos, Maria
    Vera-Rodriguez, Sandra
    Luis Guerrero-Naranjo, Jose
    Morales-Canton, Virgilio
    OPHTHALMIC SURGERY LASERS & IMAGING, 2010, 41 (04) : 432 - 436
  • [5] Pain relief during panretinal photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy: a national survey
    C Richardson
    H Waterman
    Eye, 2009, 23 : 2233 - 2237
  • [6] Pain relief during panretinal photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy: a national survey
    Richardson, C.
    Waterman, H.
    EYE, 2009, 23 (12) : 2233 - 2237
  • [7] Panretinal Photocoagulation Plus Intravitreal Bevacizumab Versus Panretinal Photocoagulation Alone for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
    Ali, Warda
    Abbasi, Kanwal Zareen
    Raza, Ali
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2018, 28 (12): : 923 - 927
  • [8] Combination intravitreal bevacizumab/panretinal photocoagulation versus panretinal photocoagulation alone in the treatment of neovascular glaucoma
    Ehlers, Justis P.
    Spirn, Marc J.
    Lam, Andrew
    Sivalingam, Arunan
    Samuel, Michael A.
    Tasman, William
    RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 2008, 28 (05): : 696 - 702
  • [9] Topical Diclofenac Versus Oral Ibuprofen Versus Department Patients With Acute Low Back Pain: A Randomized Study
    Khankhel, Nauman
    Friedman, Benjamin W.
    Baer, Jesse
    Lopez, Lucy
    Feliciano, Carmen
    Lee, Sharon
    Irizarry, Eddie
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 83 (06) : 542 - 551
  • [10] Topical diclofenac versus oral diclofenac in the treatment of mastalgia - a randomized clinical trial
    Zafar, Afsheen
    Rehnnan, Ahmed
    RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 38 (04): : 371 - 377