Topical Diclofenac Versus Oral Ibuprofen Versus Department Patients With Acute Low Back Pain: A Randomized Study

被引:2
|
作者
Khankhel, Nauman [1 ]
Friedman, Benjamin W. [2 ]
Baer, Jesse [2 ]
Lopez, Lucy [2 ]
Feliciano, Carmen [2 ]
Lee, Sharon [2 ]
Irizarry, Eddie [2 ]
机构
[1] Vassar Bros Med Ctr, Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 USA
[2] Montefiore Med Ctr, Bronx, NY USA
关键词
PLACEBO; KETOPROFEN; NAPROXEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.01.037
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory fl ammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are useful for a variety of musculoskeletal injuries. It is not known whether topical NSAIDs should be used for patients presenting with acute nonradicular musculoskeletal low back pain. Methods: We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind study in which patients 18 to 69 years of age visiting the emergency department (ED) with acute, nontraumatic, nonradicular, musculoskeletal low back pain were randomized at the time of discharge to treatment with 400 mg oral ibuprofen + placebo topical gel, 1% diclofenac topical gel + oral placebo, or 400 mg ibuprofen + 1% diclofenac topical gel. We measured outcomes using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), a 24- item yes/no instrument about the effect of back pain on a respondent's ' s daily activities. The primary outcome was change in RMDQ score between ED discharge and 2 days later. Medication-related adverse events were elicited by asking whether the study medications caused any new symptoms. Results: In total, 3,281 patients were screened for participation, and 198 were randomized. Overall, 36% of the population were women, the mean age was 40 years (standard deviation, 13), and the median RMDQ score at baseline was 18 (25th to 75th percentile: 13 to 22), indicating substantial low back-related functional impairment. In total, 183 (92%) participants provided primary outcome data. Two days after the ED visit, the ibuprofen + placebo group had improved by 10.1 (95% confidence fi dence interval [CI] 7.5 to 12.7), the diclofenac gel + placebo group by 6.4 (95% CI 4.0 to 8.8), and the ibuprofen + diclofenac gel by 8.7 (95% CI 6.3 to 11.1). The between-group differences were as follows: ibuprofen versus diclofenac, 3.7 (95% CI 0.2 to 7.2); ibuprofen versus both medications 1.4 (95% CI- 2.1 to 4.9); and diclofenac versus both medications, 2.3 (95% CI- 5.7 to 1.0). Medication-related adverse events were reported by 3/60 (5%) ibuprofen patients, 1/63 (2%) diclofenac patients, and 4/64 (6%) patients who received both. Conclusion: Among patients with nontraumatic, nonradicular acute musculoskeletal low back pain discharged from an ED, topical diclofenac was probably less efficacious i cacious than oral ibuprofen. It demonstrated no additive benefit fi t when coadministered with oral ibuprofen. [Ann Emerg Med. 2024;83:542-551.]
引用
收藏
页码:542 / 551
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A randomized controlled trial of ibuprofen versus ketorolac versus diclofenac for acute, nonradicular low back pain
    Irizarry, Eddie
    Restivo, Andrew
    Salama, Maha
    Davitt, Michelle
    Feliciano, Carmen
    Cortijo-Brown, Alexis
    Friedman, Benjamin W.
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 28 (11) : 1228 - 1235
  • [2] Ibuprofen Plus Acetaminophen Versus Ibuprofen Alone for Acute Low Back Pain: An Emergency Department-based Randomized Study
    Friedman, Benjamin W.
    Irizarry, Eddie
    Chertoff, Andrew
    Feliciano, Carmen
    Solorzano, Clemencia
    Zias, Eleftheria
    Gallagher, E. John
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 27 (03) : 228 - 235
  • [3] Oral Versus Topical Ibuprofen for Chronic Knee Pain: A Prospective Randomized Pilot Study
    Tiso, Robert L.
    Tong-Ngork, Sarani
    Fredlund, Katherine L.
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2010, 13 (05) : 457 - 467
  • [4] Ibuprofen plus paracetamol versus ibuprofen in acute low back pain: a randomized open label multicenter clinical study
    Ostojic, P.
    Radunovic, G.
    Lazovic, M.
    Tomanovic-Vujadinovic, S.
    ACTA REUMATOLOGICA PORTUGUESA, 2017, 42 (01): : 18 - 25
  • [5] TENOXICAM IN ACUTE LOW-BACK-PAIN - AN OPEN COMPARATIVE-STUDY VERSUS DICLOFENAC
    GALANTI, A
    PARESCE, E
    CERAVOLO, P
    MARSANO, S
    DUCI, D
    CARRABBA, M
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1992, 31 : 155 - 155
  • [6] Topical diclofenac versus oral diclofenac in the treatment of mastalgia - a randomized clinical trial
    Zafar, Afsheen
    Rehnnan, Ahmed
    RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 38 (04): : 371 - 377
  • [7] Oral ibuprofen versus oral ketorolac for children with moderate and severe acute traumatic pain: a randomized comparative study
    Ghirardo, Sergio
    Trevisan, Matteo
    Ronfani, Luca
    Zanon, Davide
    Maestro, Alessandra
    Barbieri, Francesca
    De Nardi, Laura
    Amaddeo, Alessandro
    Barbi, Egidio
    Cozzi, Giorgio
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2023, 182 (02) : 929 - 935
  • [8] Oral ibuprofen versus oral ketorolac for children with moderate and severe acute traumatic pain: a randomized comparative study
    Sergio Ghirardo
    Matteo Trevisan
    Luca Ronfani
    Davide Zanon
    Alessandra Maestro
    Francesca Barbieri
    Laura De Nardi
    Alessandro Amaddeo
    Egidio Barbi
    Giorgio Cozzi
    European Journal of Pediatrics, 2023, 182 : 929 - 935
  • [9] Oral versus Topical Diclofenac for Pain Prevention during Panretinal Photocoagulation
    Zakrzewski, Peter A.
    O'Donnell, Heather L.
    Lam, Wai-Ching
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 116 (06) : 1168 - 1174
  • [10] INTRAMUSCULAR KETOROLAC VERSUS ORAL IBUPROFEN IN ACUTE MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN
    TURTURRO, MA
    PARIS, PM
    SEABERG, DC
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1995, 26 (02) : 117 - 120