Topical Diclofenac Versus Oral Ibuprofen Versus Department Patients With Acute Low Back Pain: A Randomized Study

被引:2
|
作者
Khankhel, Nauman [1 ]
Friedman, Benjamin W. [2 ]
Baer, Jesse [2 ]
Lopez, Lucy [2 ]
Feliciano, Carmen [2 ]
Lee, Sharon [2 ]
Irizarry, Eddie [2 ]
机构
[1] Vassar Bros Med Ctr, Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 USA
[2] Montefiore Med Ctr, Bronx, NY USA
关键词
PLACEBO; KETOPROFEN; NAPROXEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.01.037
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory fl ammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are useful for a variety of musculoskeletal injuries. It is not known whether topical NSAIDs should be used for patients presenting with acute nonradicular musculoskeletal low back pain. Methods: We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind study in which patients 18 to 69 years of age visiting the emergency department (ED) with acute, nontraumatic, nonradicular, musculoskeletal low back pain were randomized at the time of discharge to treatment with 400 mg oral ibuprofen + placebo topical gel, 1% diclofenac topical gel + oral placebo, or 400 mg ibuprofen + 1% diclofenac topical gel. We measured outcomes using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), a 24- item yes/no instrument about the effect of back pain on a respondent's ' s daily activities. The primary outcome was change in RMDQ score between ED discharge and 2 days later. Medication-related adverse events were elicited by asking whether the study medications caused any new symptoms. Results: In total, 3,281 patients were screened for participation, and 198 were randomized. Overall, 36% of the population were women, the mean age was 40 years (standard deviation, 13), and the median RMDQ score at baseline was 18 (25th to 75th percentile: 13 to 22), indicating substantial low back-related functional impairment. In total, 183 (92%) participants provided primary outcome data. Two days after the ED visit, the ibuprofen + placebo group had improved by 10.1 (95% confidence fi dence interval [CI] 7.5 to 12.7), the diclofenac gel + placebo group by 6.4 (95% CI 4.0 to 8.8), and the ibuprofen + diclofenac gel by 8.7 (95% CI 6.3 to 11.1). The between-group differences were as follows: ibuprofen versus diclofenac, 3.7 (95% CI 0.2 to 7.2); ibuprofen versus both medications 1.4 (95% CI- 2.1 to 4.9); and diclofenac versus both medications, 2.3 (95% CI- 5.7 to 1.0). Medication-related adverse events were reported by 3/60 (5%) ibuprofen patients, 1/63 (2%) diclofenac patients, and 4/64 (6%) patients who received both. Conclusion: Among patients with nontraumatic, nonradicular acute musculoskeletal low back pain discharged from an ED, topical diclofenac was probably less efficacious i cacious than oral ibuprofen. It demonstrated no additive benefit fi t when coadministered with oral ibuprofen. [Ann Emerg Med. 2024;83:542-551.]
引用
收藏
页码:542 / 551
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Psychosocial Differences in High Risk Versus Low Risk Acute Low-Back Pain Patients
    Carla B. Pulliam
    Robert J. Gatchel
    Margaret A. Gardea
    Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2001, 11 : 43 - 52
  • [32] Psychosocial differences in high risk versus low risk acute low-back pain patients
    Pulliam, CB
    Gatchel, RJ
    Gardea, MA
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2001, 11 (01) : 43 - 52
  • [33] Effectiveness of hot herbal compress versus topical diclofenac in treating patients with myofascial pain syndrome
    Boonruab, Jurairat
    Damjuti, Watchara
    Niempoog, Sunyarn
    Pattaraarchachai, Junya
    JOURNAL OF TRADITIONAL AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, 2019, 9 (02): : 163 - 167
  • [34] Oral versus rectal diclofenac for postoperative tonsillectomy pain in children
    Swanepoel, A
    Semple, P
    ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 54 (03) : 298 - 299
  • [35] Acute Low Back Pain in the Emergency Department
    Hayes, Karen
    Huckstadt, Alicia
    Daggett, Dana
    ADVANCED EMERGENCY NURSING JOURNAL, 2006, 28 (03) : 234 - 247
  • [36] Topical diclofenac versus placebo: A double blind, randomized clinical trial in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee
    Grace, D
    Rogers, J
    Skeith, K
    Anderson, K
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1999, 26 (12) : 2659 - 2663
  • [37] Comparison of isokinetic exercise versus standard exercise training in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled study
    Sertpoyraz, Filiz
    Eyigor, Sibel
    Karapolat, Hale
    Capaci, Kazim
    Kirazli, Ye Im
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2009, 23 (03) : 238 - 247
  • [38] Efficacy and Safety of Diclofenac + Capsaicin Gel in Patients with Acute Back/Neck Pain: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study
    Hans-Georg Predel
    Caty Ebel-Bitoun
    Barbara Peil
    Thomas W. Weiser
    Robert Lange
    Pain and Therapy, 2020, 9 : 279 - 296
  • [39] Efficacy of metamizole versus ibuprofen and a short educational intervention versus standard care in acute and subacute low back pain: a study protocol of a randomised, multicentre, factorial trial (EMISI trial)
    Wertli, Maria M.
    Flury, Julian S.
    Streit, Sven
    Limacher, Andreas
    Schuler, Vanessa
    Ferrante, Asha-Naima
    Rimensberger, Caroline
    Haschke, Manuel
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (10):
  • [40] Low-dose oral isotretinoin versus topical retinoic acid for photoaging: a randomized, comparative study
    Bagatin, Edileia
    Guadanhim, Lilia R. S.
    Enokihara, Milvia M. S. S.
    Sanudo, Adriana
    Talarico, Sergio
    Miot, Helio A.
    Gibson, Lawrence
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2014, 53 (01) : 114 - 122