Topical Diclofenac Versus Oral Ibuprofen Versus Department Patients With Acute Low Back Pain: A Randomized Study

被引:2
|
作者
Khankhel, Nauman [1 ]
Friedman, Benjamin W. [2 ]
Baer, Jesse [2 ]
Lopez, Lucy [2 ]
Feliciano, Carmen [2 ]
Lee, Sharon [2 ]
Irizarry, Eddie [2 ]
机构
[1] Vassar Bros Med Ctr, Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 USA
[2] Montefiore Med Ctr, Bronx, NY USA
关键词
PLACEBO; KETOPROFEN; NAPROXEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.01.037
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory fl ammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are useful for a variety of musculoskeletal injuries. It is not known whether topical NSAIDs should be used for patients presenting with acute nonradicular musculoskeletal low back pain. Methods: We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind study in which patients 18 to 69 years of age visiting the emergency department (ED) with acute, nontraumatic, nonradicular, musculoskeletal low back pain were randomized at the time of discharge to treatment with 400 mg oral ibuprofen + placebo topical gel, 1% diclofenac topical gel + oral placebo, or 400 mg ibuprofen + 1% diclofenac topical gel. We measured outcomes using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), a 24- item yes/no instrument about the effect of back pain on a respondent's ' s daily activities. The primary outcome was change in RMDQ score between ED discharge and 2 days later. Medication-related adverse events were elicited by asking whether the study medications caused any new symptoms. Results: In total, 3,281 patients were screened for participation, and 198 were randomized. Overall, 36% of the population were women, the mean age was 40 years (standard deviation, 13), and the median RMDQ score at baseline was 18 (25th to 75th percentile: 13 to 22), indicating substantial low back-related functional impairment. In total, 183 (92%) participants provided primary outcome data. Two days after the ED visit, the ibuprofen + placebo group had improved by 10.1 (95% confidence fi dence interval [CI] 7.5 to 12.7), the diclofenac gel + placebo group by 6.4 (95% CI 4.0 to 8.8), and the ibuprofen + diclofenac gel by 8.7 (95% CI 6.3 to 11.1). The between-group differences were as follows: ibuprofen versus diclofenac, 3.7 (95% CI 0.2 to 7.2); ibuprofen versus both medications 1.4 (95% CI- 2.1 to 4.9); and diclofenac versus both medications, 2.3 (95% CI- 5.7 to 1.0). Medication-related adverse events were reported by 3/60 (5%) ibuprofen patients, 1/63 (2%) diclofenac patients, and 4/64 (6%) patients who received both. Conclusion: Among patients with nontraumatic, nonradicular acute musculoskeletal low back pain discharged from an ED, topical diclofenac was probably less efficacious i cacious than oral ibuprofen. It demonstrated no additive benefit fi t when coadministered with oral ibuprofen. [Ann Emerg Med. 2024;83:542-551.]
引用
收藏
页码:542 / 551
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Oral administration of morphine versus ibuprofen to manage postfracture pain in children: a randomized trial
    Poonai, Naveen
    Bhullar, Gina
    Lin, Kangrui
    Papini, Adam
    Mainprize, David
    Howard, Jocelyn
    Teefy, John
    Bale, Michelle
    Langford, Cindy
    Lim, Rodrick
    Stitt, Larry
    Rieder, Michael J.
    Ali, Samina
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2014, 186 (18) : 1358 - 1363
  • [22] Rapid MR imaging versus plain radiography in patients with low back pain: Initial results of a randomized study
    Jarvik, JG
    Maravilla, KR
    Haynor, DR
    Levitz, M
    Deyo, RA
    RADIOLOGY, 1997, 204 (02) : 447 - 454
  • [23] Salivary cortisol and psychological mechanisms in patients with acute versus chronic low back pain
    Sudhaus, Sigrid
    Fricke, Britta
    Stachon, Axel
    Schneider, Stefan
    Klein, Harald
    von Duering, Monika
    Hasenbring, Monika
    PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2009, 34 (04) : 513 - 522
  • [24] PARENTERAL DIPYRONE VERSUS DICLOFENAC AND PLACEBO IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE LUMBAGO OR SCIATIC PAIN - RANDOMIZED OBSERVER-BLIND MULTICENTER STUDY
    BABEJDOLLE, R
    FREYTAG, S
    ECKMEYER, J
    ZERLE, G
    SCHINZEL, S
    SCHMIEDER, G
    STANKOV, G
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 1994, 32 (04) : 204 - 209
  • [25] A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, CONTROLLED TRIAL ON THE EFFICACY OF TOPICAL KETOPROFEN VERSUS TOPICAL PLACEBO IN PAIN INTENSITY REDUCTION IN PATIENTS WITH LOW BACK PAIN UNDERGOING NEEDLE ELECTROMYOGRAPHY
    Ng, Kenneth
    Evangelista, Teresita Joy
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2015, 52 : S101 - S101
  • [26] Efficacy and tolerability of celecoxib 200 mg bid versus diclofenac 75 mg bid in acute low back pain
    Dietrich, I.
    Ralha, L.
    Chahade, W. H.
    Oliveira, L. G.
    Rangel, P. R.
    Sun, W.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2006, 65 : 238 - 238
  • [27] A randomized controlled trial of oxycodone/acetaminophen versus acetaminophen alone for emergency department patients with musculoskeletal pain refractory to ibuprofen
    Friedman, Benjamin W.
    Irizarry, Eddie
    Feliciano, Carmen
    Izzo, Albert J.
    Borrayes, Lester
    Restivo, Andrew
    Costa, Vincent
    Bijur, Polly E.
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 28 (08) : 859 - 865
  • [28] Oral VTS-Aspirin/Ketamine Versus Oral Ketamine for Emergency Department Patients With Acute Musculoskeletal Pain
    Gerges, L.
    Fassassi, C.
    Masoudi, A.
    Correa-Bravo, S.
    Drapkin, J.
    Likourezos, A.
    Hossain, R.
    Butt, M.
    Silver, M.
    Motov, S.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 80 (04) : S130 - S131
  • [29] Battlefield Acupuncture Versus Standard Pharmacologic Treatment of Low Back Pain in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Johnston, Kyle
    Bonjour, Timothy
    Powell, Jacob
    April, Michael D.
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 61 (04): : 406 - 414
  • [30] A comparative trial of oral versus topical diclofenac in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee
    Tugwell, PS
    Wells, GA
    Shainhouse, JZ
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2003, 62 : 73 - 73