Topical Diclofenac Versus Oral Ibuprofen Versus Department Patients With Acute Low Back Pain: A Randomized Study

被引:2
|
作者
Khankhel, Nauman [1 ]
Friedman, Benjamin W. [2 ]
Baer, Jesse [2 ]
Lopez, Lucy [2 ]
Feliciano, Carmen [2 ]
Lee, Sharon [2 ]
Irizarry, Eddie [2 ]
机构
[1] Vassar Bros Med Ctr, Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 USA
[2] Montefiore Med Ctr, Bronx, NY USA
关键词
PLACEBO; KETOPROFEN; NAPROXEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.01.037
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory fl ammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are useful for a variety of musculoskeletal injuries. It is not known whether topical NSAIDs should be used for patients presenting with acute nonradicular musculoskeletal low back pain. Methods: We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind study in which patients 18 to 69 years of age visiting the emergency department (ED) with acute, nontraumatic, nonradicular, musculoskeletal low back pain were randomized at the time of discharge to treatment with 400 mg oral ibuprofen + placebo topical gel, 1% diclofenac topical gel + oral placebo, or 400 mg ibuprofen + 1% diclofenac topical gel. We measured outcomes using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), a 24- item yes/no instrument about the effect of back pain on a respondent's ' s daily activities. The primary outcome was change in RMDQ score between ED discharge and 2 days later. Medication-related adverse events were elicited by asking whether the study medications caused any new symptoms. Results: In total, 3,281 patients were screened for participation, and 198 were randomized. Overall, 36% of the population were women, the mean age was 40 years (standard deviation, 13), and the median RMDQ score at baseline was 18 (25th to 75th percentile: 13 to 22), indicating substantial low back-related functional impairment. In total, 183 (92%) participants provided primary outcome data. Two days after the ED visit, the ibuprofen + placebo group had improved by 10.1 (95% confidence fi dence interval [CI] 7.5 to 12.7), the diclofenac gel + placebo group by 6.4 (95% CI 4.0 to 8.8), and the ibuprofen + diclofenac gel by 8.7 (95% CI 6.3 to 11.1). The between-group differences were as follows: ibuprofen versus diclofenac, 3.7 (95% CI 0.2 to 7.2); ibuprofen versus both medications 1.4 (95% CI- 2.1 to 4.9); and diclofenac versus both medications, 2.3 (95% CI- 5.7 to 1.0). Medication-related adverse events were reported by 3/60 (5%) ibuprofen patients, 1/63 (2%) diclofenac patients, and 4/64 (6%) patients who received both. Conclusion: Among patients with nontraumatic, nonradicular acute musculoskeletal low back pain discharged from an ED, topical diclofenac was probably less efficacious i cacious than oral ibuprofen. It demonstrated no additive benefit fi t when coadministered with oral ibuprofen. [Ann Emerg Med. 2024;83:542-551.]
引用
收藏
页码:542 / 551
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effectiveness of Back School Versus McKenzie Exercises in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Garcia, Alessandra Narciso
    Menezes Costa, Luciola da Cunha
    da Silva, Tatiane Mota
    Barreto Gondo, Francine Lopes
    Cyrillo, Fabio Navarro
    Costa, Renata Alqualo
    Pena Costa, Leonardo Oliveira
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2013, 93 (06): : 729 - 747
  • [42] A Randomized Clinical Trial of Ibuprofen Versus Acetaminophen With Codeine for Acute Pediatric Arm Fracture Pain
    Drendel, Amy L.
    Gorelick, Marc H.
    Weisman, Steven J.
    Lyon, Roger
    Brousseau, David C.
    Kim, Michael K.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2009, 54 (04) : 553 - 560
  • [43] Valdecoxib is as efficacious as diclofenac in the treatment of acute low back pain
    Ximenes, Antonio
    Robles, Manuel
    Sands, George
    Vinueza, Raul
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2007, 23 (03): : 244 - 250
  • [44] A Multicentre, Randomised, Double- Blind Study Comparing the Efficacy and Tolerability of Intramuscular Dexketoprofen versus Diclofenac in the Symptomatic Treatment of Acute Low Back Pain
    H. Zip-pel
    A. Wagenitz
    Clinical Drug Investigation, 2007, 27 : 533 - 543
  • [45] A multicentre, randomised, double-blind study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of intramuscular dexketoprofen versus diclofenac in the symptomatic treatment of acute low back pain
    Zippel, H.
    Wagenitz, A.
    CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2007, 27 (08) : 533 - 543
  • [46] Intravenous paracetamol versus dexketoprofen versus morphine in acute mechanical low back pain in the emergency department: a randomised double-blind controlled trial
    Eken, Cenker
    Serinken, Mustafa
    Elicabuk, Hayri
    Uyanik, Emrah
    Erdal, Muhammed
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2014, 31 (03) : 177 - 181
  • [47] Intravenous ibuprofen versus sodium valproate in acute migraine attacks in the emergency department: A randomized clinical trial
    Dogruyol, Sinem
    Gur, Sultan Tuna Akgol
    Akbas, Ilker
    Kocak, Meryem Betos
    Kocak, Abdullah Osman
    Ceylan, Mustafa
    Tekyol, Davut
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 55 : 126 - 132
  • [48] Impact of Oral versus Intravenous Ibuprofen on Neurodevelopmental Outcome: A Randomized Controlled Parallel Study
    Eras, Zeynep
    Gokmen, Tulin
    Erdeve, Omer
    Ozyurt, Banu Mutlu
    Saridas, Bagdagul
    Dilmen, Ugur
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2013, 30 (10) : 855 - 859
  • [49] Methocarbamol versus diazepam in acute low back pain in the emergency department: a randomised double-blind clinical trial
    Sharifi, Meisam
    Abdorazzaghnejad, Ali
    Yazdchi, Mahtab
    Bahreini, Maryam
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2023, 40 (07) : 493 - +
  • [50] COMPLIANCE FOR LOW-BACK-PAIN PATIENTS IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL
    JONES, SL
    JONES, PK
    KATZ, J
    SPINE, 1988, 13 (05) : 553 - 556