Oral versus Topical Diclofenac for Pain Prevention during Panretinal Photocoagulation

被引:22
|
作者
Zakrzewski, Peter A. [2 ]
O'Donnell, Heather L. [2 ]
Lam, Wai-Ching [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Toronto Western Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Ophthalmol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE; ANALOG SCALE PAIN; LASER; RETROBULBAR; PENETRATION; ANESTHESIA; MANAGEMENT; SEVERITY; SODIUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.01.022
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the effect of pretreatment oral and topical diclofenac on pain reduction during panretinal laser photocoagulation (PRP) for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Design: Prospective, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Participants and Controls: A total of 90 patients with PDR requiring PRP for the first time were assigned randomly to 1 of 3 study groups: oral diclofenac (n = 30), topical diclofenac (n = 31), or placebo (n = 29). Methods: Study medications were administrated before the first PRP treatment, and pain levels experienced during and 15 minutes after PRP were recorded on a visual analog scale (VAS). Pain levels during a second PRP session, performed on a later date with no pretreatment medications, also were recorded on a VAS. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measures were the mean VAS pain scores during the first PRP treatment. Secondary outcome measures were the mean VAS pain scores 15 minutes after the first PRP and during the second PRP, and reported side effects after the first PRP. Results: Mean VAS pain scores during the first PRP were: oral diclofenac, 25.7 +/- 19.9; topical diclofenac, 33.8 +/- 27.9; and placebo, 41.3 +/- 31.0. The pain score difference between oral diclofenac and placebo was both clinically significant (>= 13) and statistically significant (P = 0.02), whereas differences between oral and topical diclofenac (P = 0.20) and topical diclofenac and placebo (P = 0.33) were not. Multivariate regression analysis for age, gender, and total laser energy demonstrated lower pain levels for both oral diclofenac (P = 0.015) and topical diclofenac (P<0.0001) versus placebo, but no difference between oral and topical diclofenac (P = 0.67). For the first PRP, all 3 groups had lower mean pain scores at 15 minutes after treatment compared with during treatment (P <= 0.0003). Mean pain scores were higher during the second compared with the first PRP for the oral diclofenac (P = 0.02) and placebo (P = 0.05) groups. No significant rate difference for any side effect was found between groups. Conclusions: When given in a single dose, oral diclofenac is an effective pretreatment analgesic agent for reducing the pain experienced during PRP for PDR. Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article. Ophthalmology 2009;116:1168-1174 (C) 2009 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
引用
收藏
页码:1168 / 1174
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ARGON VERSUS KRYPTON PANRETINAL PHOTOCOAGULATION SIDE-EFFECTS ON THE ANTERIOR SEGMENT
    MENCHINI, U
    SCIALDONE, A
    PIETRONI, C
    CARONES, F
    BRANCATO, R
    OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 1990, 201 (02) : 66 - 70
  • [42] Panretinal photocoagulation(PRP) versus Intravitreal bevacizumab plus PRP for diabetic retinopathy
    Oh, Jeongjae
    Kim, Sukjin
    Kim, Kiseok
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2014, 55 (13)
  • [43] Cost Evaluation of Panretinal Photocoagulation versus Intravitreal Ranibizumab for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
    Lin, James
    Chang, Jonathan S.
    Smiddy, William E.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 123 (09) : 1912 - 1918
  • [44] DICLOFENAC EPOLAMINE TOPICAL PATCH FOR THE TREATMENT OF PAIN
    Affaitati, G.
    Giamberardino, M. A.
    Lapenna, D.
    Costantini, R.
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL REGULATORS AND HOMEOSTATIC AGENTS, 2018, 32 (03): : 435 - 441
  • [45] Efficacy and relevance of topical diclofenac for osteoarthritic pain
    Bierma-Zeinstra, SMA
    Belo, JN
    Thomas, S
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 165 (05) : 588 - 589
  • [46] Does topical diclofenac relieve osteoarthritis pain?
    Hodge, Bryan
    Skolnik, Debbie
    Mounsey, Anne
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 2015, 64 (02): : 124 - 125
  • [47] Diclofenac Transdermal Patch versus Oral Diclofenac on Post Endodontic Pain and Quality of Life: A Randomised Clinical Trial
    Modi, Kajal
    Sundar, Sathish
    Kowsky, Dinesh
    Natanasabapathy, Velmurugan
    EUROPEAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2024, 9 (03): : 203 - 209
  • [48] Efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab combined with pan retinal photocoagulation versus panretinal photocoagulation alone in treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy
    Sameen, Murtaza
    Khan, Muhammad Saim
    Mukhtar, Ahsan
    Yaqub, Muhammad Amer
    Ishaq, Mazhar
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 33 (01) : 142 - 145
  • [49] Effectiveness of hot herbal compress versus topical diclofenac in treating patients with myofascial pain syndrome
    Boonruab, Jurairat
    Damjuti, Watchara
    Niempoog, Sunyarn
    Pattaraarchachai, Junya
    JOURNAL OF TRADITIONAL AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, 2019, 9 (02): : 163 - 167
  • [50] Panretinal Photocoagulation for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: Pattern Scan Laser Versus Argon Laser
    Chappelow, Aimee V.
    Tan, Kevin
    Waheed, Nadia K.
    Kaiser, Peter K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 153 (01) : 137 - 142