Oral versus Topical Diclofenac for Pain Prevention during Panretinal Photocoagulation

被引:22
|
作者
Zakrzewski, Peter A. [2 ]
O'Donnell, Heather L. [2 ]
Lam, Wai-Ching [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Toronto Western Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Ophthalmol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE; ANALOG SCALE PAIN; LASER; RETROBULBAR; PENETRATION; ANESTHESIA; MANAGEMENT; SEVERITY; SODIUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.01.022
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the effect of pretreatment oral and topical diclofenac on pain reduction during panretinal laser photocoagulation (PRP) for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Design: Prospective, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Participants and Controls: A total of 90 patients with PDR requiring PRP for the first time were assigned randomly to 1 of 3 study groups: oral diclofenac (n = 30), topical diclofenac (n = 31), or placebo (n = 29). Methods: Study medications were administrated before the first PRP treatment, and pain levels experienced during and 15 minutes after PRP were recorded on a visual analog scale (VAS). Pain levels during a second PRP session, performed on a later date with no pretreatment medications, also were recorded on a VAS. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measures were the mean VAS pain scores during the first PRP treatment. Secondary outcome measures were the mean VAS pain scores 15 minutes after the first PRP and during the second PRP, and reported side effects after the first PRP. Results: Mean VAS pain scores during the first PRP were: oral diclofenac, 25.7 +/- 19.9; topical diclofenac, 33.8 +/- 27.9; and placebo, 41.3 +/- 31.0. The pain score difference between oral diclofenac and placebo was both clinically significant (>= 13) and statistically significant (P = 0.02), whereas differences between oral and topical diclofenac (P = 0.20) and topical diclofenac and placebo (P = 0.33) were not. Multivariate regression analysis for age, gender, and total laser energy demonstrated lower pain levels for both oral diclofenac (P = 0.015) and topical diclofenac (P<0.0001) versus placebo, but no difference between oral and topical diclofenac (P = 0.67). For the first PRP, all 3 groups had lower mean pain scores at 15 minutes after treatment compared with during treatment (P <= 0.0003). Mean pain scores were higher during the second compared with the first PRP for the oral diclofenac (P = 0.02) and placebo (P = 0.05) groups. No significant rate difference for any side effect was found between groups. Conclusions: When given in a single dose, oral diclofenac is an effective pretreatment analgesic agent for reducing the pain experienced during PRP for PDR. Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article. Ophthalmology 2009;116:1168-1174 (C) 2009 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
引用
收藏
页码:1168 / 1174
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Metamizole versus placebo for panretinal photocoagulation pain control: A prospective double-masked randomized controlled study
    de Araújo R.B.
    Zacharias L.C.
    de Azevedo B.M.
    Giusti B.S.
    Pretti R.C.
    Takahashi W.Y.
    Monteiro M.L.R.
    International Journal of Retina and Vitreous, 1 (1)
  • [32] Metamizole as analgesic during panretinal photocoagulation in proliferative diabetic retinopathy
    Araujo, Rafael
    Zacharias, Leandro
    Takahashi, Walter
    Leitao, Maiara
    Nascimento, Vinicius
    Melo, Gabriela
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (15)
  • [33] Intravitreal pegaptanib sodium versus panretinal photocoagulation in the management of diabetic retinopathy
    Gonzalez, Victor H.
    Vann, Vincent R.
    Banda, Rodolfo M.
    Giuliari, Gian P.
    Guel, David A.
    DIABETES, 2007, 56 : A26 - A27
  • [34] Effect of Topical Nepafenac on Central Foveal Thickness following Panretinal Photocoagulation in Diabetic Patients
    Abu Hussein, Nahla B.
    Mohalhal, Ahmed A.
    Ghalwash, Dalia A.
    Abdel-Kader, Ahmed A.
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 2017
  • [35] A Comparative Study of Retinal Function in Rabbits after Panretinal Selective Retina Therapy versus Conventional Panretinal Photocoagulation
    Park, Young Gun
    Kang, Seungbum
    Brinkmann, Ralf
    Roh, Young-Jung
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 2015
  • [36] Single-Spot Yellow Laser Versus Conventional Green Laser on Panretinal Photocoagulation: Patient Pain Scores and Preferences
    Gonzalez-Saldivar, Gerardo
    Rojas-Juarez, Sergio
    Espinosa-Soto, Itzel
    Sanchez-Ramos, Jorge
    Jaurieta-Hinojosa, Noel
    Ramirez-Estudillo, Abel
    OPHTHALMIC SURGERY LASERS & IMAGING RETINA, 2017, 48 (11): : 902 - 905
  • [37] Comparison of navigated laser and conventional single-spot laser system for induced pain during panretinal photocoagulation
    Onur Polat
    Sibel Inan
    Zeki Baysal
    Safiye Yigit
    Umit Ubeyt Inan
    Lasers in Medical Science, 2020, 35 : 687 - 693
  • [38] Comparison of navigated laser and conventional single-spot laser system for induced pain during panretinal photocoagulation
    Polat, Onur
    Inan, Sibel
    Baysal, Zeki
    Yigit, Safiye
    Inan, Umit Ubeyt
    LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 35 (03) : 687 - 693
  • [39] Prevention of miosis during IOL surgery: Comparison of efficacy of topical diclofenac sodium and topical flurbiprofen.
    Tripathi, A
    Quah, SA
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2001, 42 (04) : S8 - S8
  • [40] Efficacy and safety of a topical diclofenac solution compared with topical placebo, vehicle, oral diclofenac and oral/topical combination in the symptomatic treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee
    Simon, Lee S.
    Grierson, Lisa M.
    Naseer, Zahid
    Bookman, Arthur A. M.
    Shainhouse, Zev
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2008, 58 (09): : S483 - S483