Oral versus Topical Diclofenac for Pain Prevention during Panretinal Photocoagulation

被引:22
|
作者
Zakrzewski, Peter A. [2 ]
O'Donnell, Heather L. [2 ]
Lam, Wai-Ching [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Toronto Western Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Ophthalmol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE; ANALOG SCALE PAIN; LASER; RETROBULBAR; PENETRATION; ANESTHESIA; MANAGEMENT; SEVERITY; SODIUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.01.022
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the effect of pretreatment oral and topical diclofenac on pain reduction during panretinal laser photocoagulation (PRP) for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Design: Prospective, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Participants and Controls: A total of 90 patients with PDR requiring PRP for the first time were assigned randomly to 1 of 3 study groups: oral diclofenac (n = 30), topical diclofenac (n = 31), or placebo (n = 29). Methods: Study medications were administrated before the first PRP treatment, and pain levels experienced during and 15 minutes after PRP were recorded on a visual analog scale (VAS). Pain levels during a second PRP session, performed on a later date with no pretreatment medications, also were recorded on a VAS. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measures were the mean VAS pain scores during the first PRP treatment. Secondary outcome measures were the mean VAS pain scores 15 minutes after the first PRP and during the second PRP, and reported side effects after the first PRP. Results: Mean VAS pain scores during the first PRP were: oral diclofenac, 25.7 +/- 19.9; topical diclofenac, 33.8 +/- 27.9; and placebo, 41.3 +/- 31.0. The pain score difference between oral diclofenac and placebo was both clinically significant (>= 13) and statistically significant (P = 0.02), whereas differences between oral and topical diclofenac (P = 0.20) and topical diclofenac and placebo (P = 0.33) were not. Multivariate regression analysis for age, gender, and total laser energy demonstrated lower pain levels for both oral diclofenac (P = 0.015) and topical diclofenac (P<0.0001) versus placebo, but no difference between oral and topical diclofenac (P = 0.67). For the first PRP, all 3 groups had lower mean pain scores at 15 minutes after treatment compared with during treatment (P <= 0.0003). Mean pain scores were higher during the second compared with the first PRP for the oral diclofenac (P = 0.02) and placebo (P = 0.05) groups. No significant rate difference for any side effect was found between groups. Conclusions: When given in a single dose, oral diclofenac is an effective pretreatment analgesic agent for reducing the pain experienced during PRP for PDR. Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article. Ophthalmology 2009;116:1168-1174 (C) 2009 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
引用
收藏
页码:1168 / 1174
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Panretinal photocoagulation versus intravitreal injection retreatment pain in high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy
    Farias de Araujo Lucena, Celia Regina
    Ramos Filho, Jose Afonso
    Vieira Messias, Andre Marcio
    da Silva, Jose Aparecido
    Paes de Almeida, Felipe Piacentini
    Scott, Ingrid Ursula
    Santana Ribeiro, Jefferson Augusto
    Jorge, Rodrigo
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE OFTALMOLOGIA, 2013, 76 (01) : 18 - 20
  • [22] TOPICAL ADMINISTRATION OF DICLOFENAC (1%) IN THE PREVENTION OF MIOSIS DURING VITRECTOMY
    Mirshahi, Ahmad
    Djalilian, Ali
    Rafiee, Fereshte
    Namavari, Abed
    RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 2008, 28 (09): : 1215 - 1220
  • [23] A comparative trial of oral versus topical diclofenac in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee
    Tugwell, PS
    Wells, GA
    Shainhouse, JZ
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2003, 62 : 73 - 73
  • [24] ETDRS panretinal photocoagulation combined with intravitreal ranibizumab versus PASCAL panretinal photocoagulation with intravitreal ranibizumab versus intravitreal ranibizumab alone for the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy
    Barroso, Rafael de Montier P.
    Messias, Katharina
    Garcia, Denny Marcos
    Cardillo, Jose Augusto
    Scott, Ingrid U.
    Messias, Andre
    Jorge, Rodrigo
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE OFTALMOLOGIA, 2020, 83 (06) : 526 - 534
  • [25] Oral versus rectal diclofenac for postoperative tonsillectomy pain in children
    Swanepoel, A
    Semple, P
    ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 54 (03) : 298 - 299
  • [26] Systemic Bioavailability of Topical Diclofenac Sodium Gel 1% Versus Oral Diclofenac Sodium in Healthy Volunteers
    Kienzler, Jean-Luc
    Gold, Morris
    Nollevaux, Fabrice
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 50 (01): : 50 - 61
  • [27] Comparative Analysis of Pain and Duration in Panretinal Photocoagulation: Navilas Laser versus Conventional Laser in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
    Karapapak, Murat
    Ozal, Ece
    Ermis, Serhat
    Guler, Serkan
    Ozal, Sadik Altan
    MEDICAL BULLETIN OF SISLI ETFAL HOSPITAL, 2024, 58 (03): : 325 - 331
  • [28] Interventions for relieving pain associated with panretinal photocoagulation: a prospective randomized trial
    Wu, W-C
    Hsu, K-H
    Chen, T-L
    Hwang, Y-S
    Lin, K-K
    Li, L-M
    Shih, C-P
    Lai, C-C
    EYE, 2006, 20 (06) : 712 - 719
  • [29] Interventions for relieving pain associated with panretinal photocoagulation: a prospective randomized trial
    W-C Wu
    K-H Hsu
    T-L Chen
    Y-S Hwang
    K-K Lin
    L-M Li
    C-P Shih
    C-C Lai
    Eye, 2006, 20 : 712 - 719
  • [30] Pain Perception of Patients Undergoing Laser Panretinal Photocoagulation: Comparison of Single-Spot Versus Multispot Techniques
    Barbosa, Gabriel Castilho
    Silva, Allan Gomes
    Susanna, Bianca Nicolela
    Mazzeo, Thiago Muniz
    Bermudes, Frederico Hackbart
    Machado, Cleide Guimaraes
    Gomes, Andre Vieira
    OPHTHALMIC SURGERY LASERS & IMAGING RETINA, 2022, 53 (01): : 40 - 45